< ARCHIVE

> FILE / A3728077

FBI-UAP-62-HQ-83894, PROJECT TWINKLE AND AERIAL PHENOMENA, NEW MEXICO, 1948-1950

This compilation of FBI and OSI records details the investigation of green fireballs, discs, and unidentified aerial phenomena near sensitive installations. It includes extensive sighting logs from the 17th District OSI, correspondence regarding Project Twinkle, and administrative inquiries into the credibility of authors and witnesses. The documents reflect the Bureau's coordination with the Air Force and Atomic Energy Commission to determine if sightings represented foreign technological threats.

AGENCY
FBI
TYPE
REPORT
INCIDENT DATE
1948-12-01
LOCATION
NEW MEXICO, USA
PAGES
271
EXTRACTED
259 / 271
STATUS
READY

> PAGES INDEXED [271]

OPEN A PAGE BELOW

  1. Page 1P.1DECLASSI
  2. Page 2P.2
  3. Page 3P.3
  4. Page 4P.4
  5. Page 5P.5
  6. Page 6P.6CONFIDEN
  7. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.7
  8. Page 8P.8
  9. Page 9P.9
  10. Page 10P.10CONFIDEN
  11. Page 11P.11CONFIDEN
  12. Page 12P.12CONFIDEN
  13. Page 13P.13UNCLASSI
  14. Page 14P.14
  15. Page 15P.15
  16. Page 16P.16
  17. Page 17P.17
  18. Page 18P.18UNCLASSI
  19. Page 19P.19UNCLASSI
  20. Page 20P.20
  21. Page 21P.21
  22. Page 22P.22UNCLASSI
  23. Page 23P.23
  24. Page 24P.24CONFIDEN
  25. Page 25P.25CONFIDEN
  26. Page 26P.26CONFIDEN
  27. Page 27P.27CONFIDEN
  28. Page 28P.28CONFIDEN
  29. Page 29P.29CONFIDEN
  30. Page 30P.30CONFIDEN
  31. Page 31P.31CONFIDEN
  32. Page 32P.32CONFIDEN
  33. Page 33P.33CONFIDEN
  34. Page 34P.34CONFIDEN
  35. Page 35P.35CONFIDEN
  36. Page 36P.36CONFIDEN
  37. Page 37P.37CONFIDEN
  38. Page 38P.38CONFIDEN
  39. Page 39P.39CONFIDEN
  40. Page 40P.40CONFIDEN
  41. Page 41P.41CONFIDEN
  42. Page 42P.42CONFIDEN
  43. Page 43P.43CONFIDEN
  44. Page 44P.44CONFIDEN
  45. Page 45P.45CONFIDEN
  46. Page 46P.46CONFIDEN
  47. Page 47P.47CONFIDEN
  48. Page 48P.48CONFIDEN
  49. Page 49P.49CONFIDEN
  50. Page 50P.50CONFIDEN
  51. Page 51P.51CONFIDEN
  52. Page 52P.52CONFIDEN
  53. Page 53P.53CONFIDEN
  54. Page 54P.54CONFIDEN
  55. Page 55P.55CONFIDEN
  56. Page 56P.56CONFIDEN
  57. Page 57P.57CONFIDEN
  58. Page 58P.58CONFIDEN
  59. Page 59P.59CONFIDEN
  60. Page 60P.60CONFIDEN
  61. Page 61P.61CONFIDEN
  62. Page 62P.62CONFIDEN
  63. Page 63P.63CONFIDEN
  64. Page 64P.64CONFIDEN
  65. Page 65P.65CONFIDEN
  66. Page 66P.66CONFIDEN
  67. Page 67P.67CONFIDEN
  68. Page 68P.68CONFIDEN
  69. Page 69P.69CONFIDEN
  70. Page 70P.70CONFIDEN
  71. Page 71P.71CONFIDEN
  72. Page 72P.72
  73. Page 73P.73DECLASSI
  74. Page 74P.74
  75. Page 75P.75
  76. Page 76P.76
  77. Page 77P.77
  78. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.78
  79. Page 79P.79
  80. Page 80P.80
  81. Page 81P.81
  82. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.82
  83. Page 83P.83CONFIDEN
  84. Page 84P.84
  85. Page 85P.85
  86. Page 86P.86
  87. Page 87P.87UNCLASSI
  88. Page 88P.88
  89. Page 89P.89
  90. Page 90P.90
  91. Page 91P.91
  92. Page 92P.92UNCLASSI
  93. Page 93P.93UNCLASSI
  94. Page 94P.94
  95. Page 95P.95
  96. Page 96P.96CONFIDEN
  97. Page 97P.97CONFIDEN
  98. Page 98P.98
  99. Page 99P.99
  100. Page 100P.100CONFIDEN
  101. Page 101P.101CONFIDEN
  102. Page 102P.102
  103. Page 103P.103
  104. Page 104P.104CONFIDEN
  105. Page 105P.105CONFIDEN
  106. Page 106P.106UNCLASSI
  107. Page 107P.107
  108. Page 108P.108
  109. Page 109P.109
  110. Page 110P.110
  111. Page 111P.111
  112. Page 112P.112
  113. Page 113P.113UNCLASSI
  114. Page 114P.114UNCLASSI
  115. Page 115P.115UNCLASSI
  116. Page 116P.116UNCLASSI
  117. Page 117P.117CONFIDEN
  118. Page 118P.118CONFIDEN
  119. Page 119P.119UNCLASSI
  120. Page 120P.120UNCLASSI
  121. Page 121P.121
  122. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.122
  123. Page 123P.123
  124. Page 124P.124
  125. Page 125P.125UNCLASSI
  126. Page 126P.126
  127. Page 127P.127
  128. Page 128P.128UNCLASSI
  129. Page 129P.129UNCLASSI
  130. Page 130P.130CONFIDEN
  131. Page 131P.131
  132. Page 132P.132UNCLASSI
  133. Page 133P.133
  134. Page 134P.134DECLASSI
  135. Page 135P.135
  136. Page 136P.136
  137. Page 137P.137UNCLASSI
  138. Page 138P.138UNCLASSI
  139. Page 139P.139
  140. Page 140P.140UNCLASSI
  141. Page 141P.141
  142. Page 142P.142
  143. Page 143P.143
  144. Page 144P.144UNCLASSI
  145. Page 145P.145
  146. Page 146P.146
  147. Page 147P.147
  148. Page 148P.148
  149. Page 149P.149CONFIDEN
  150. Page 150P.150UNCLASSI
  151. Page 151P.151UNCLASSI
  152. Page 152P.152CONFIDEN
  153. Page 153P.153CONFIDEN
  154. Page 154P.154CONFIDEN
  155. Page 155P.155CONFIDEN
  156. Page 156P.156CONFIDEN
  157. Page 157P.157CONFIDEN
  158. Page 158P.158CONFIDEN
  159. Page 159P.159CONFIDEN
  160. Page 160P.160CONFIDEN
  161. Page 161P.161CONFIDEN
  162. Page 162P.162CONFIDEN
  163. Page 163P.163CONFIDEN
  164. Page 164P.164UNCLASSI
  165. Page 165P.165
  166. Page 166P.166
  167. Page 167P.167UNCLASSI
  168. Page 168P.168
  169. Page 169P.169
  170. Page 170P.170
  171. Page 171P.171UNCLASSI
  172. Page 172P.172
  173. Page 173P.173
  174. Page 174P.174UNCLASSI
  175. Page 175P.175UNCLASSI
  176. Page 176P.176
  177. Page 177P.177UNCLASSI
  178. Page 178P.178UNCLASSI
  179. Page 179P.179UNCLASSI
  180. Page 180P.180
  181. Page 181P.181
  182. Page 182P.182
  183. Page 183P.183
  184. Page 184P.184
  185. Page 185P.185UNCLASSI
  186. Page 186P.186UNCLASSI
  187. Page 187P.187
  188. Page 188P.188UNCLASSI
  189. Page 189P.189
  190. Page 190P.190UNCLASSI
  191. Page 191P.191UNCLASSI
  192. Page 192P.192UNCLASSI
  193. Page 193P.193UNCLASSI
  194. Page 194P.194
  195. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.195
  196. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.196
  197. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.197
  198. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.198
  199. Page 199P.199
  200. Page 200P.200CONFIDEN
  201. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.201
  202. Page 202P.202
  203. Page 203P.203
  204. Page 204P.204CONFIDEN
  205. Page 205P.205
  206. Page 206P.206
  207. Page 207P.207
  208. Page 208P.208
  209. Page 209P.209
  210. Page 210P.210UNCLASSI
  211. Page 211P.211
  212. Page 212P.212
  213. Page 213P.213UNCLASSI
  214. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.214
  215. Page 215P.215
  216. Page 216P.216
  217. Page 217P.217
  218. Page 218P.218
  219. Page 219P.219
  220. Page 220P.220
  221. Page 221P.221
  222. Page 222P.222
  223. Page 223P.223UNCLASSI
  224. Page 224P.224UNCLASSI
  225. Page 225P.225CONFIDEN
  226. Page 226P.226
  227. Page 227P.227
  228. Page 228P.228
  229. Page 229P.229
  230. Page 230P.230
  231. Page 231P.231
  232. Page 232P.232
  233. Page 233P.233
  234. Page 234P.234
  235. Page 235P.235
  236. Page 236P.236
  237. Page 237P.237
  238. Page 238P.238
  239. Page 239P.239UNCLASSI
  240. Page 240P.240
  241. Page 241P.241
  242. Page 242P.242UNCLASSI
  243. Page 243P.243
  244. Page 244P.244
  245. Page 245P.245
  246. Page 246P.246
  247. Page 247P.247
  248. Page 248P.248UNCLASSI
  249. Page 249P.249
  250. Page 250P.250
  251. Page 251P.251UNCLASSI
  252. Page 252P.252
  253. Page 253P.253
  254. Page 254P.254UNCLASSI
  255. Page 255P.255
  256. Page 256P.256
  257. Page 257P.257
  258. Page 258P.258UNCLASSI
  259. Page 259P.259UNCLASSI
  260. Page 260P.260
  261. Page 261P.261UNCLASSI
  262. Page 262P.262CONFIDEN
  263. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.263
  264. Page 264P.264UNCLASSI
  265. [NO PREVIEW]
    P.265
  266. Page 266P.266
  267. Page 267P.267
  268. Page 268P.268UNCLASSI
  269. Page 269P.269
  270. Page 270P.270UNCLASSI
  271. Page 271P.271

> PAGE TEXT

PAGE 1

cover-page

This is a cover page for an FBI file (62-HQ-83894, Section 6) containing various administrative stamps regarding copying for FOIPA requests and handling instructions.

4-564 (12-22-55)

FBI - CENTRAL RECORDS CENTER
HQ - HEADQUARTERS
Class / Case #   Sub   Vol.   Serial #
0062 83894             6      246    301

8/11/1274188

[HANDWRITTEN: Serial 278 COPIED FOR]

Department of Justice
REMOVED FROM OR ADDED TO THIS FILE

COPIED FOR
F I P A
BY
BUREAU

COPIED FOR
[HANDWRITTEN: +]

MAR 2 1978

INVESTIGATION
COPIED FOR
F I P A
JAN 19 1979 BY

COPIED FOR
F I P A
APR 18 1977 BY

[HANDWRITTEN: PIONEER STREET]

USE CARE IN HANDLING THIS FILE
DO NOT
Transfer-Call DESTROY
FOIPA # 993087

62-HQ-83894
SERIALS 246-301
SECTION 6

PAGE 2

memo

An FBI memorandum from A. H. Belmont to D. M. Ladd regarding the investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena (green fireballs, discs, and meteors) near sensitive installations in New Mexico, noting the involvement of Dr. LaPaz and Land-Air Inc.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : D. M. Ladd
FROM : A. H. Belmont
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF AERIAL
PHENOMENA IN NEW MEXICO
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

DATE: August 23, 1950

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Clegg, Glavin, Nichols, Rosen, Tracy, Harbo, Belmont, Mohr, Tele. Room, Lease, Gandy]

PURPOSE
To advise that: (1) OSI has expressed concern in connection with the continued appearance of unexplained phenomena described as green fireballs, discs and meteors in the vicinity of sensitive installations in New Mexico. (2) Dr. LaPaz, Meteor Expert of the University of New Mexico, reported that the phenomena does not appear to be of meteoric origin. (3) OSI has contracted with Land-Air Inc., Alamogordo, New Mexico, to make scientific study of the unexplained phenomena.

NATURE OF PHENOMENA
Observations of aerial phenomena occurring within the vicinity of sensitive installations have been recorded by the Air Force since December, 1948. The phenomena have been classified into 3 general types which are identified as follows:
1. Green fireballs, objects moving at high speed in shapes resembling half moons, circles and discs emitting green light.
2. Discs, round flat shaped objects or phenomena moving at fast velocity and emitting a brilliant white light or reflected light.
3. Meteors, aerial phenomena resembling meteoric material moving at high velocity and varying in color.

The above phenomena have been reported to vary in color from brilliant white to amber, red and green.

Since 1948, approximately 150 observations of aerial phenomena referred to above have been recorded in the vicinity of installations in New Mexico. A number of observations have been reported by different reliable individuals at approximately the same time.

KWD/mp
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-246]
RECORDED - 2
INDEXED - 2
[HANDWRITTEN: SEP 8 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: 52 SEP 18 1950]

PAGE 3

other

This page consists of a collection of date-stamped receipt markings from various FBI offices and officials, including Belmont, Tolson, and the Director's office, spanning from August 23, 1950, to September 6, 1950.

RECEIVED-LADD
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
SEP 5 9 32 AM '50

SEP 5 11 02 AM '50
REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED-LADD
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
AUG 23 2 41 PM '50

SEP 2 12 16 PM '50
RECEIVED-TOLSON
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE

AUG 24 2 50 PM '50
RECEIVED-TOLSON
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED
12 42 PM '50
SEP 6 1950
ESPIONAGE
RECEIVED - DIRECTOR
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
SEP 1 6 59 PM '50

PAGE 4

report

This report summarizes findings by Professor Lincoln LaPaz regarding green fireballs and discs, suggesting they may be guided missiles, and details the subsequent Air Force investigation and establishment of Project Twinkle.

RESULTS OF AN INQUIRY BY PROFESSOR LINCOLN LA PAZ

Dr. LaPaz, Director, Institute of Meteoritics, University of New Mexico, submitted an analysis of the various observations on May 23, 1950. He concluded, as a result of his investigation, that approximately half of the phenomena recorded were of meteoric origin. The other phenomena commonly referred to as green fireballs or discs he believed to be U.S. guided missiles being tested in the neighborhood of the installations. Dr. LaPaz pointed out that if he were wrong in interpreting the phenomena as originating with U.S. guided missiles that a systematic investigation of the observations should be made immediately. Dr. LaPaz pointed out that missiles moving with the velocities of the order of those found for the green fireballs and discs could travel from the Ural region of the USSR to New Mexico in less than 15 minutes. He suggested that the observations might be of guided missiles launched from bases in the Urals.

On the basis of the investigations made by Dr. LaPaz and the Air Force, it was concluded that the occurrence of the unexplained phenomena in the vicinity of sensitive installations was a cause for concern. The Air Force entered into a contract with Land-Air, Incorporated, Alamogordo, New Mexico, for the purpose of making scientific studies of the green fireballs and discs. It was pointed out in the summary furnished by OSI on July 19, 1950, that the unexplained green fireballs and discs are still observed in the vicinity of sensitive military and Government installations.

RESULTS OF AIR FORCE INVESTIGATION

The Air Force together with Land-Air, Incorporated, have established a number of observation posts in the vicinity of Vaughn, New Mexico, for the purpose of photographing and determining the speed, height and nature of the unusual phenomena referred to as green fireballs and discs. On May 24, 1950, personnel of Land-Air, Incorporated, sighted 8 to 10 objects of aerial phenomena. A 24-hour day watch is being maintained and has been designated Project Twinkle.

PAGE 5

memo

This document concludes that there were no new developments regarding green fireballs and discs as of August 10, 1950, and notes that Dr. Anthony O. Mirarchi has been informed of the Bureau's jurisdictional scope.

CONCLUSIONS

The Albuquerque Office, in a letter dated August 10, 1950, advised that there have been no new developments in connection with the efforts to ascertain the identity of the strange aerial phenomena referred to as green fireballs and discs. The Albuquerque Office advised that Dr. Anthony O. Mirarchi, Project Engineer, had been informed of the Bureaus jurisdiction relative to espionage and sabotage and arrangements have been made so that the Bureau will be promptly advised in the event additional information relative to this project indicates any jurisdiction on the part of the Bureau.

ACTION

None. The above is for your information. [HANDWRITTEN: initials and checkmark]

PAGE 6

memo

A memo from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to the Director of Special Investigations at the Air Force, forwarding a letter from Mr. Walter D. Jones regarding flying saucers.

September 8, 1950

To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington, D. C.

From: John Edgar Hoover - Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation

Subject: FLYING SAUCERS

There is attached hereto for your consideration and attention a copy of a self-explanatory letter dated August 29, 1950, received by this Bureau from Mr. Walter D. Jones, of 36 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

For your information, the letter from Mr. Jones has been acknowledged by this Bureau, and he has been informed his communication has been referred to your Department.

[HANDWRITTEN: Attachment.]

APPROPRIATE AGENCIES
AND FIELD OFFICES
ADVISED BY ROUTING
SLIP(S) OF 2040
DATE 9/1/77

EHM:eas

RECORDED - 5

[HANDWRITTEN: 62 8389 247]
[HANDWRITTEN: SEP 14 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: R337]
[HANDWRITTEN: SEP 20 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: EHM per wnk.]

MAILED 1A
SEP 11 1950
COMM - FBI

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

memo

An FBI memorandum detailing a report from SAC Cornelius regarding Philadelphia police officers who observed a mysterious object that landed, glowed, and disintegrated.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : MR. A. H. BELMONT [HANDWRITTEN: A] DATE: September 27, 1950
FROM : MR. L. L. LAUGHLIN [HANDWRITTEN: A]
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS [HANDWRITTEN: G.L.R. - I]

SAC Cornelius of Philadelphia called at 10:45 A.M. today and stated that yesterday evening while two officers of the Philadelphia Police Department were cruising in their scout car they saw through the windshield an object descending slowly to the earth which appeared at first glance to be a parachute.

When the officers first noticed the object, it was at tree-top level and was described as being six feet in diameter. It landed in a field near-by and the officers, upon examining it, noted that it gave out a purplish glow which was almost a mist. The officers summoned two other police officers. After looking at the object for some time they attempted to pick it up. The object broke, leaving a slight odorless residue. Over a period of about 25 minutes which the officers spent watching the object it completely disintegrated. The officers further commented that the object was so light that when it hit the field, it did not even bend the weeds or the grass it fell on.

Mr. Cornelius said that he has called the local office of the Air Force but the individual with whom he spoke there said he knew nothing about them and was not aware that his office was looking into reports of this type.

Mr. Cornelius desired to know what further action should be taken by him.

I told Mr. Cornelius that he was correct in referring this matter to the local office of OSI and that he should direct a letter to the Bureau incorporating all available information concerning the matter and that we here, upon its receipt, in turn would bring it to the attention of OSI Headquarters.

LLL:mer
[HANDWRITTEN: maj copied admin 9.29-50 E.I.S.]
RECORDED - 84 62-838944-14
OCT 4 1950
51 OCT 10 1950

PAGE 9

memo

A memorandum regarding a report from a Mr. [REDACTED] in Philadelphia about a police investigation into a mysterious object that landed in a field and subsequently disintegrated.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

TO: [REDACTED] DATE: [REDACTED]
FROM: [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: [REDACTED]

Mr. [REDACTED] of Philadelphia called to
state that some person concerning the type of
Philadelphia Police were in the [REDACTED] in
[REDACTED] the area through the object was descending
only to the spot which appeared at first to be
[REDACTED].

Mr. [REDACTED] first noticed the object. It was
sea-foam level and was described as being a feet in diameter.
It landed in a field near-by and the officer upon examining it
noted that it gave out a peculiar odor and was looking
the object over. Other police officers were looking
at the object for some time and attempted to photograph
object plane leaving it and disintegrated. The object
of about 25 minutes which the officers spent there
completely disintegrated. The object was light and had the
same sheen as the sheen of the soap fell on.

Mr. [REDACTED] said that he called [REDACTED].
He at the office of the local office when he
knew nothing about and was not sure that he was
looking into reports of the fact.

Mr. [REDACTED] desired to know what further action should
be taken by him.

I told Mr. [REDACTED] that he was correct in referring
this matter to the local office of FBI and should direct
all the available information to the [REDACTED] in
concerning the report and that we upon receipt in
would forward the attention of [REDACTED].

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

PAGE 10

memo

A memo from the USAF Director of Intelligence, C.P. Cabell, to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover regarding the reporting of information on unconventional aircraft.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

[HANDWRITTEN: 8 SEP 1950]

Hon. J. Edgar Hoover
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Justice
Washington 25, D. C.

Dear Mr. Hoover:

The inclosed letter, subject: "Reporting of Information
on Unconventional Aircraft," is forwarded for your information
and any cooperation you may be able to extend.

As indicated in the letter it is desired to place this
subject in its proper perspective as part of the normal USAF
requirement for information of air technical intelligence
interest.

Respectfully yours,

C. P. CABELL
Major General, USAF
Director of Intelligence

1 Incl:
a/s

[HANDWRITTEN: See letter #38 dated 3/25/49]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 108]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-249]
[HANDWRITTEN: OCT 3 1950]

"This document contains information affecting the national defense
of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18
U.S.C., Sections 793 and 794. Its transmission or the revelation of its
contents in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law."

[HANDWRITTEN: 5 OCT 23 1950]

PAGE 11

memo

This is a 1950 Air Force directive establishing procedures for reporting and analyzing observations of unconventional aircraft (UFOs/UAPs) to identify potential foreign technological advancements.

CONFIDENTIAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

AFOIC-CC-1 8 September 1950
SUBJECT: Reporting of Information on Unconventional Aircraft

TO: Commanding Generals, Major Air Commands, ZI and Overseas
All United States Air Attaches

1. The United States Air Force has a continuing requirement for the reporting and technical analysis of observations of unconventional aircraft which might indicate an advance in technological progress of a foreign power. An unconventional aircraft, within the meaning of this directive, is defined as any aircraft or airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft type.

2. It is desired that information on unconventional aircraft be reported in the following manner:

a. A separate report of each incident will be forwarded. No information other than that bearing on the unconventional aircraft will be included in this report.

b. Priority of transmission accorded the report will be that appropriate in the judgment of the forwarding agency, according to its apparent authenticity and importance as intelligence.

c. Reports will be forwarded to Commanding General, Air Materiel Command, Attention: MCIS.

d. Reports forwarded by electrical transmission will include, as far as possible:

(1) A brief description of the object(s); its shape, size, color, number, formation if more than one, aerodynamic features, trail or exhaust, propulsion system, speed, sound, maneuvers, manner of disappearance, and other pertinent or unusual features.

(2) Time sighted in 24-hour clock zonal time, and length of time observed.

CONFIDENTIAL
ENCLOSURE
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-249]
[HANDWRITTEN: Ind. 1]

PAGE 12

memo

This document outlines reporting procedures for sightings, including requirements for observer details, physical evidence, and follow-up reports, signed by Major General C. P. Cabell.

(3) Manner of observation; visual or electronic, from air (give speed, altitude, and type of aircraft), or surface. Any type of optical or electronic equipment used should be described.

(4) Location of observer during sighting, giving exact latitude and longitude as closely as feasible, and/or reference to a known landmark. Location of object(s) with respect to observer, giving distance, direction, and altitude.

(5) Identifying information on observer(s) and witnesses, estimate of reliability and experience, and any factors bearing on estimated reliability of the sighting.

(6) Weather and wind conditions (teletype sequences) at time and place of sightings.

(7) Any activity or condition, meteorological or otherwise, which might account for the sighting.

(8) Existence of any physical evidence; fragments, photographs and the like, of the sighting.

(9) Interception or identification action taken. (Such action should be taken whenever feasible, complying with existing air defense directives.)

e. Reports forwarded by electrical transmission will be followed up within ten (10) days by a written report on AF Form 112. This report will contain the same information specified in subparagraph 2d above in greater detail, and where feasible will include sketches and signed attested narrative statements of observers.

f. Written reports of sightings, where no previous electrically transmitted report has been submitted, will follow the same form as the written follow-up report described in subparagraph 2e above.

g. Any physical evidence of the sighting will be forwarded by most expeditious means to Commanding General, Air Materiel Command, Attn: MCIS, under cover of a letter identifying the shipment with the report of sighting. Mention of the method and time of shipping of this evidence will be included in written report of the sighting.

3. It is desired that no publicity be given this reporting or analysis activity.

BY COMMAND OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF:

Info copies to:
Dir/Int, G-2, Army
Dir/Naval Int.
Commandant (INT) US Coast Guard
Sp Asst for Research & Intel, State
Director FBI
Director of CIA

[HANDWRITTEN: C P Cabell]
C. P. CABELL
Major General, USAF
Director of Intelligence

PAGE 13

memo

This memorandum from Mr. D. M. Ladd to the Director provides an update on Project Twinkle and the Bureau's jurisdiction regarding aerial phenomena, noting that the Air Force retains primary jurisdiction.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : THE DIRECTOR DATE: October 9, 1950
FROM : MR. D. M. LADD
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS
FLYING DISCS
GREEN FIREBALLS
[HANDWRITTEN: Jm] [HANDWRITTEN: el] [HANDWRITTEN: Tolson checkmark] [HANDWRITTEN: Ladd] [HANDWRITTEN: Clegg] [HANDWRITTEN: Glavin] [HANDWRITTEN: Nichols checkmark] [HANDWRITTEN: Rosen] [HANDWRITTEN: Tracy] [HANDWRITTEN: Harto] [HANDWRITTEN: Mohr] [HANDWRITTEN: Tele. Room] [HANDWRITTEN: Nease] [HANDWRITTEN: Gandy]
PURPOSE
To advise you of the most recent information known to the Bureau concerning the captioned aerial phenomena.
BACKGROUND
You will recall that on August 23, 1950, I furnished to you a memorandum regarding Project Twinkle set up by the Department of the Air Force, with the assistance of Land-Air, Inc., at Vaughn, New Mexico, for the purpose of obtaining data regarding these unusual aerial phenomena which had been seen in the vicinity of sensitive installations in New Mexico. To date the Air Force has not advised us of any new developments in connection with this project.
Dr. Anthony O. Mirarchi, Project Engineer of Project Twinkle, has been contacted by the Albuquerque Office and arrangements have been made in order that the Bureau will be advised in the event any information relative to these phenomena indicates any jurisdiction on the part of the Bureau.
According to Bureau files, an average of approximately three or four complaints have been received per month from June through September. These complaints were brought to the attention of OSI. A review of Bureau files does not indicate that there has been any increase in the sightings of these phenomena during or as a result of the war in Korea.
JURISDICTION FOR INVESTIGATION OF THESE PHENOMENA
You will recall the investigation to obtain information concerning these aerial phenomena is the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force. The Department of the Air Force is aware of our jurisdiction in matters relating to espionage, sabotage and internal security, and we have contacted OSI and requested them to advise us of any developments in connection with these phenomena which would be of interest to us as a result of our jurisdiction.
EHM:de [HANDWRITTEN: 148] RECORDED - 105 [HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-250] OCT 10 1950 [HANDWRITTEN: EHM] 52 OCT 16 1950 [HANDWRITTEN: RECEIVED-105] [HANDWRITTEN: OCT 8 28]

PAGE 14

memo

A memorandum dated October 9, 1950, regarding the investigation of 'flying discs' and the coordination of information between the FBI and other agencies, including reports from New Mexico.

MEMORANDUM
TO: THE DIRECTOR
FROM: [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: FLYING DISCS
DATE: October 9, 1950

To advise you of the last recent information to the
[REDACTED] regarding these phenomena.

[REDACTED] I reported that on August 29, 1950, a
memorandum prepared by the [REDACTED] regarding the report of the
[REDACTED] Inc., with the concurrence of the [REDACTED] and the
[REDACTED] for the purpose of obtaining these factual phenomena
which had been seen in the vicinity of [REDACTED] New Mexico.
[REDACTED] date to the [REDACTED] not been developed as yet
in connection with this project.

[REDACTED] A. [REDACTED] project engineer of [REDACTED] has
been contacted by the [REDACTED] Office and arrangements have been made
in order that he will be provided with the information relative
to these phenomena indicating [REDACTED] on the part of the [REDACTED].

According to [REDACTED] an average of six [REDACTED] reports
[REDACTED] have been received from the [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]
information were brought to the attention of the [REDACTED] and
[REDACTED] due to my absence in the [REDACTED] of these [REDACTED]
during the [REDACTED] of the [REDACTED] in [REDACTED].

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[REDACTED] will continue to obtain the information [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] of the [REDACTED] of the [REDACTED] and the [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] is aware of the [REDACTED] and the [REDACTED] and
[REDACTED] have [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and
[REDACTED] requested then to advise of any developments in connection
therewith which would be of interest to us as a matter of
[REDACTED] information.

PAGE 15

memo

This document summarizes information from the OSI regarding aerial phenomena, stating that investigations have not found evidence of extraterrestrial or foreign missile involvement and that the OSI is continuing to monitor the situation.

POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THESE AERIAL PHENOMENA

The Bureau has been advised in the past by OSI that many of the
sightings reported to them were determined by investigation to have been
of weather balloons, falling stars, meteorological phenomena and other air-borne
objects.

INFORMATION OBTAINED BY BUREAU LIAISON FROM OSI, WASHINGTON, D. C.
RE THE CAPTIONED MATTERS ON OCTOBER 9, 1950.

Bureau liaison determined on the morning of October 9, 1950 from
OSI headquarters that the investigations of these aerial phenomena are being
handled by OSI, Wright Field, Ohio. Their investigation of these
phenomena fails to indicate that the sightings involved space ships or
missiles from any other planet or country.

According to OSI, the complaints received by them have failed to
indicate any definite pattern of activity. OSI further advised they are closely
following the investigation of the captioned matters, and they will advise this
Bureau of any matters of interest.

ACTION

None. The above is for your information.

- 2 -

PAGE 16

memo

This FBI memorandum from October 9, 1950, discusses the status of Project Twinkle and the Bureau's jurisdiction regarding aerial phenomena (flying saucers/discs/green fireballs) in relation to the Department of the Air Force and OSI.

THE DIRECTOR
MR. D. M. LADD

FLYING SAUCERS
FLYING DISCS
GREEN FIREBALLS

October 9, 1950

PURPOSE
To advise you of the most recent information known to the
Bureau concerning the captioned aerial phenomena.

BACKGROUND
You will recall that on August 23, 1950, I furnished to you a
memorandum regarding Project Twinkle set up by the Department of the
Air Force, with the assistance of Land-Air, Inc., at Vaughn, New Mexico,
for the purpose of obtaining data regarding these unusual aerial phenomena
which had been seen in the vicinity of sensitive installations in New
Mexico. To date the Air Force has not advised us of any new developments
in connection with this project.

Dr. Anthony O. Mirarchi, Project Engineer of Project Twinkle, has
been contacted by the Albuquerque Office and arrangements have been made in
order that the Bureau will be advised in the event any information relative
to these phenomena indicates any jurisdiction on the part of the Bureau.

According to Bureau files, an average of approximately three or
four complaints have been received per month from June through September.
These complaints were brought to the attention of OSI. A review of Bureau files
does not indicate that there has been an increase in the sightings of these
phenomena during or as a result of the war in Korea.

JURISDICTION FOR INVESTIGATION OF THESE PHENOMENA
You will recall the investigation to obtain information concerning
these aerial phenomena is the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force.
The Department of the Air Force is aware of our jurisdiction in matters
relating to espionage, sabotage and internal security, and we have contacted
OSI and requested them to advise us of any developments in connection with
these phenomena which would be of interest to us as a result of our
jurisdiction.

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Clegg, Glavin, Nichols, Rosen, Tracy, Harbo, Belmont, Mohr, Tele. room, ease, Andy]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-250]
[HANDWRITTEN: de 39]
[STAMP: 59 OCT 23 1950]

PAGE 17

memo

This memo summarizes information provided by the OSI to the FBI regarding aerial phenomena, stating that investigations have attributed sightings to weather balloons, falling stars, and meteorological phenomena, and that there is no evidence of space ships or foreign missiles.

POSSIBLE ORIGIN OF THESE AERIAL PHENOMENA

The Bureau has been advised in the past by OSI that many of the sightings reported to them were determined by investigation to have been of weather balloons, falling stars, meteorological phenomena and other air-borne objects.

INFORMATION OBTAINED BY BUREAU LIAISON FROM OSI, WASHINGTON, D. C.
RE THE CAPTIONED MATTERS ON OCTOBER 9, 1950.

Bureau Liaison determined on the morning of October 9, 1950 from OSI headquarters that the investigations of these aerial phenomena are being handled by OSI, Wright Field, Ohio. Their investigation of these phenomena fails to indicate that the sightings involved space ships or missiles from any other planet or country.

According to OSI, the complaints received by them have failed to indicate any definite pattern of activity. OSI further advised they are closely following the investigation of the captioned matters, and they will advise this Bureau of any matters of interest.

ACTION

None. The above is for your information.

- 2 -

PAGE 18

memo

An FBI memorandum reporting a sighting of a round, lavender-colored object by two Philadelphia police officers on September 26, 1950, which subsequently evaporated.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: October 2, 1950
FROM : SAC, PHILADELPHIA ATTENTION: MR. LEO LAUGHLIN
SUBJECT: FLYING DISC REPORTED AT
PHILADELPHIA ON 9/26/50
[HANDWRITTEN: FLYING SAUCERS]
During the late evening hours of September 26, 1950, two Philadelphia police officers observed a peculiar phenomenon on Vare Boulevard near 26th Street when they saw a round object about six feet in circumference slowly float down to the ground.

The object had the appearance of a parachute and landed in a field, it being so light it did not even depress the weeds in the field. The object was lavender in color, described by the officers as dewy, sort of like soap suds, and evaporating within fifteen or twenty minutes after it landed. When touched by the officers, the substance composing the object disappeared, leaving nothing but a slight sticky substance.

This matter was reported to this office by the Philadelphia Police and for that matter, was subsequently carried in the Philadelphia press as "Flying Saucer Just Dissolves".

Mr. LAUGHLIN of the Bureau was telephonically advised of the above by this office and issued instructions that the matter should be referred to Air Force Intelligence for handling and any investigation. Accordingly, Major WATTS of the Philadelphia Office of OSI was telephonically advised of the above and no further action was taken by this office.

FMK/mmd
98-0
[HANDWRITTEN: B]
[HANDWRITTEN: Mossberg]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-251]
[HANDWRITTEN: Laughlin]
[HANDWRITTEN: FIVE]

PAGE 19

memo

A memorandum from the Philadelphia FBI office reporting a witness account of a lavender, hemispherical unidentified flying object landing in a field on September 29, 1950, and subsequently departing.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

TO: DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: October 5, 1950
FROM: SAC, PHILADELPHIA
SUBJECT: UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS

During the late hours of September 29, 1950, two
reliable police officers observed a phenomenon on
[REDACTED] which they described as a round object
which took in information down to the ground.

The object was described as a hemisphere and landed in a
field. It did not even damage the weeds in the field.
The object was lavender in color, described by the officers as
being 6 feet in diameter and hovering within 10 feet of the
ground, minutes after it landed, it zoomed up to the
stratosphere and disappeared, leaving the area without a
trace of its presence.

This matter was reported to this office by the [REDACTED]
Police and was subsequently carried in the [REDACTED]
Philadelphia newspapers.

[REDACTED] of the Bureau was telephonically advised of the
above facts and issued instructions that the matter should be
referred to the Air Force Intelligence and investigation
conducted by the Philadelphia office of the FBI was
telephonically advised of the above and no further action was taken.

[HANDWRITTEN: 65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 6]

RECEIVED
OCT 6 12 25 PM '50
F B I
U.S. DEP. OF JUSTICE

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE
OCT 5 3 13 PM '50

PAGE 20

letter

A letter from E.L. Welton proposing a theoretical mechanism for how flying saucers operate, specifically involving a revolving disc generator and electric motors.

Oct 7, 1950
E.L. Welton
413 Irving ave.
Glendale Calif.
E.L. WELTON

My theory of the flying saucer is:
It gets its power from electricity generated by a gen generator, the generator is run from a revolving disc, therefore giving the flying saucers a disc like appearance.
By the use of gears the revolving disc is able to generate 10 or 20 times more power than is needed.
The faster the disc goes, the more power. By use of the new light weight electric motors, there is less weight, and less space taken.
The revolving disc is in side of light shell. Foreward motion of ship allows disc to revolve, generating electric power.
This way, the flying disc could fly almost any length of time
Compressed air could be used to start power disc.
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] OF FLYING DISCS]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
RECORDED - 125
INDEXED - 125
162-83894-2
OCT 13 1950
EX-29
50 OCT 25 1950

PAGE 21

other

This page contains mostly illegible handwritten notes and standard FBI date/time stamps from October 11, 1950.

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

MR. JONES.
RECEIVED
OCT 11 3 42 PM '50
F B I
S DEPT OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED
RECORDS SECTION
OCT 11 14 42 '50
INDEXED - 152
RECORDED - 152

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

PAGE 22

memo

An urgent FBI memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Los Angeles SAC requesting an investigation into whether author Frank Scully is the same individual involved in Communist activities since the late 1930s.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

To: COMMUNICATIONS SECTION. OCTOBER 13, 1950 URGENT
Transmit the following message to: SAC, LOS ANGELES

FLYING SAUCERS. YOU ARE INSTRUCTED TO DISCREETLY
DETERMINE THROUGH APPROPRIATE RELIABLE SOURCES OF YOUR OFFICE
WHETHER FRANK SCULLY, AUTHOR OF THE BOOK QUOTE BEHIND THE FLYING
SAUCERS UNQUOTE IS IDENTICAL TO THE FRANK SCULLY WHO HAS BEEN
ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN COMMUNIST ACTIVITIES SINCE THE LATE NINETEEN
THIRTIES IN THE TERRITORY OF YOUR OFFICE.

HOOVER

EHM:gma

[HANDWRITTEN: Concern]

RECORDED: 95
INDEXED 95

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-253]
[HANDWRITTEN: OCT 18 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: EHM]
[HANDWRITTEN: 5]
[HANDWRITTEN: 98]
[HANDWRITTEN: 59 37 M]
[HANDWRITTEN: Per]

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
OCT 13 1950

RECEIVED READING ROOM
F.B.I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

55 OCT 26 1950
SENT VIA
COPIES DESTROYED TELETYPE
270 NOV 23 1964

PAGE 23

other

A page indicating a change in file classification or reference number from 62-83894-254 to 100-2244-6, dated October 31, 1950.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-254]
CHANGED TO
[HANDWRITTEN: 100-2244-6]

OCT 31 1950

PAGE 24

memo

This memo from the 17th District Office of Special Investigations summarizes aerial phenomena observations in the New Mexico area from December 1948 to May 1950, noting that reports are categorized into green fireballs, discs, or meteoric events.

CONFIDENTIAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL USAF
17TH DISTRICT OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO

DR/ms
File No: (24-8)-28 25 May 1950

SUBJECT: Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena in the New
Mexico Area, December 1948 - May 1950

TO: Brigadier General Joseph F. Carroll
Director of Special Investigations
Headquarters USAF
Washington 25, D. C.
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Discs]

1. In a liaison meeting with other military and government intel-
ligence and investigative agencies in December 1948, it was determined
that the frequency of unexplained aerial phenomena in the New Mexico area
was such that an organized plan of reporting these observations should be
undertaken. The organization and physical location of units of this Dis-
trict were most suitable for collecting these data, therefore, since
December 1948, this District has assumed the responsibility for collect-
ing and reporting basic information with respect to aerial phenomena
occurring in this general area. These reports have been distributed to
the Air Materiel Command, USAF, in accordance with Air Intelligence
Requirements No. 4, and to other interested military and government
agencies.

2. There is attached, as a part of this summary, a compilation of
aerial phenomena sightings that have occurred mostly in the New Mexico
area and have been reported by this District Office subsequent to
December 1948. This compilation of sightings is not a complete record
of all reported observations, but includes only those in which sufficient
information was available to justify their inclusion. The observers of
these phenomena include scientists, Special Agents of the Office of
Special Investigations (IG) USAF, airline pilots, military pilots, Los
Alamos Security Inspectors, military personnel, and many other persons
of various occupations whose reliability is not questioned. This com-
pilation sets forth the most important characteristics with respect to
each observation and evaluates each sighting into one of three classifi-
cations, (1) green fireball phenomenon, (2) disc or variation, and (3)
probably meteoric.

3. There is also attached an analysis of the green fireball
occurrences in this area made by Dr. Lincoln LaPaz. Dr. LaPaz is the
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-255] [HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED-87] [HANDWRITTEN: 5 OCT 28 1950] [HANDWRITTEN: S1] [HANDWRITTEN: 10-]

PAGE 25

memo

This memo summarizes observations of green fireball phenomena in New Mexico between 1948 and 1950, noting that conferences were held to discuss the phenomena and that a scientific study contract was awarded to Land-Air, Inc.

CONFIDENTIAL

File No: (24-8)-28
Subj: Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena in
the New Mexico Area, December 1948 - May 1950 25 May 1950

Director of the Institute of Meteoritics and Head of the Department of
Mathematics and Astronomy at the University of New Mexico. He was Re-
search Mathematician at the New Mexico Proving Grounds under an OSRD
appointment in 1943 and 1944, and Technical Director of the Operations
Analysis Section, Headquarters, Second Air Force, 1944-45. Since 1948,
Dr. LaPaz has served on a voluntary basis as consultant for this Dis-
trict in connection with the green fireball investigations.

4. On 17 February 1949 and again on 14 October 1949, conferences
were held at Los Alamos, New Mexico, for the purpose of discussing the
green fireball phenomena. Representatives of the following organizations
were present at these meetings: Fourth Army, Armed Forces Special Wea-
pons Project, University of New Mexico, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, University of California, U. S. Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board, Geophysical Research Division Air Materiel
Command USAF, and the Office of Special Investigations (IG) USAF. A
logical explanation was not proffered with respect to the origin of the
green fireballs. It was, however, generally concluded that the pheno-
mena existed and that they should be studied scientifically until these
occurrences have been satisfactorily explained. Further, that the
continued occurrence of unexplained phenomena of this nature in the
vicinity of sensitive installations is cause for concern.

5. The Geophysical Research Division, Air Materiel Command,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, has recently let a contract to Land-Air, Inc.,
Holloman AFB, Alamogordo, New Mexico, for a limited scientific study of
green fireballs. The results of this scientific approach to the problem
will undoubtedly be of great value in determining the origin of these
phenomena.

6. This summary of observations of aerial phenomena has been
prepared for the purpose of re-emphasizing and reiterating the fact
that phenomena have continuously occurred in the New Mexico skies
during the past 18 months and are continuing to occur, and, secondly,
that these phenomena are occurring in the vicinity of sensitive mili-
tary and government installations.

[HANDWRITTEN: Doyle Rees]
DOYLE REES
Lt Colonel, USAF
District Commander

4 Incls
1. Summary of Sightings
2. Photo of Sighting No. 175
w/comments
3. Ltr fr Dr. LaPaz to Lt Col
Rees, dtd 23 May 50
4. Graph indicating maximums

2
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 26

memo

This page is a distribution list for a report titled 'Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena in the New Mexico Area, December 1948 - May 1950'.

CONFIDENTIAL

File No: (24-8)-28
Subj: Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena in
the New Mexico Area, December 1948 - May 1950 25 May 1950

DISTRIBUTION:
6 cys, Director of Special Investigations, Headquarters USAF
1 cy, CG, Air Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio
ATTN: Director of Technical Intelligence
1 cy, CG, Special Weapons Command, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico
1 cy, CG, Armed Services Special Weapons Project, Sandia Base,
New Mexico. ATTN: J-2
1 cy, CG, Headquarters, Fourth Army, Ft. Sam Houston, Texas
ATTN: AC of S, G-2
1 cy, CO, Holloman AFB, New Mexico
1 cy, CO, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Cambridge, Mass.
1 cy, Director, Security Division, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission,
Los Alamos, New Mexico. ATTN: Mr. B. O. Wells
1 cy, Federal Bureau of Investigation, El Paso, Texas
1 cy, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Albuquerque, New Mexico
1 cy, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, Pentagon Building
ATTN: Dr. Joseph Kaplan.
1 cy, Research and Development Board, Pentagon Building
ATTN: Dr. H. E. Landsberg, Executive Director, Committee on
Geophysics and Geography
1 cy, File

3
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 27

memo

A memo from Lincoln LaPaz of the University of New Mexico to Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees regarding the seventh report on anomalous luminous phenomena, specifically detailing five differences between December 1948 green fireballs and typical meteors.

CONFIDENTIAL

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE

INSTITUTE OF METEORITICS

May 23, 1950

To: Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees, Commanding Officer
17th District, O. S. I.

From: Lincoln LaPaz, Director
Institute of Meteoritics

Subject: Anomalous Luminous Phenomena (Seventh Report)

1. In the second report of this series, dated 1948, December 20, the writer listed ten significant differences between the bright green horizontally-moving fireballs observed in the interval 1948, December 5-20, and typical meteors. These differences were the following:

(1) The horizontal nature of the paths of most of the December fireballs is most unusual. Genuine meteors are rarely observed to move in horizontal paths.

(2) Again the very low height of the December fireball discussed in section 2 above sets it off in sharp contrast from the genuine meteors for which heights of the order of 40 or more miles are normally observed.

(3) The velocity determined for the fireball of December 12 is much less than the velocities determined from typical meteors (and yet is considerably greater than the speeds of the V-2 Rockets or jet planes or of conventional flares).

(4) In the case of meteorites that penetrate to as low levels as that determined for the fireball of December 12, the observed luminous phenomena are always accompanied by very violent noises. No noises whatever have been observed in connection with the various December fireballs so far investigated. (Note added on 1950, May 23: Possible exceptions to the noiselessness of green fireballs are the incidents of 1949, January 30, and 1949, December 4.)

(5) Genuine meteors normally show remarkable variations in brightness, beginning as fine thin hair lines, which are scarcely visible to the observer, and then brightening up to flash out near the end of their paths. In the case of the December fireballs most of the observers have reported that the green balls appeared almost instantly at their full brightness.

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 28

memo

This document is the second page of a report regarding anomalous luminous phenomena (green fireballs), discussing their trajectory, association with meteor showers, spectral characteristics, and duration compared to genuine meteors.

CONFIDENTIAL

To: Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees - Page 2
Subj: Anomalous Luminous Phenomena (Seventh Report) May 23, 1950

(6) In the case of genuine meteors the paths are directed toward all points of the compass with equal frequency. On the contrary in the case of the green fireballs, plots of admissible approach sectors show that there is a very pronounced tendency for the paths to come in from the north half of the sky.

(7) The three groups of anomalous greenish luminous phenomena show a curious association with well known meteor showers, although none of these meteor showers normally produce extremely bright green fireballs, such as those recently observed. For example, the observation mentioned by Mr. Monnig appeared near the maximum of the Quadrantid shower of early January, Mr. McCullough's observation of August was near the time of the Persid shower and the December observations all fell in the interval covered by the Geminid shower. This relationship might indicate an attempt to render the green fireballs less conspicuous by causing them to appear only when there is considerable meteoric activity.

(8) As noted in an earlier communication, the remarkably vivid green color reported for most of the December fireballs is rarely observed in the case of genuine meteors. By laboratory test this peculiar color seems to be identical with that given off by copper salts in the blowpipe flame. If this identification is correct, the wave length of the radiation from the green fireballs is near λ = 5218Å.

(9) The duration estimates of between 2 and 3 seconds reported for the green fireballs are considerably longer than those (0.4 - 0.5 seconds) for the ordinary visual meteors, but shorter than the duration estimates invariably reported in the case of a genuine meteorite fall (5 to 30 seconds or even longer).

(10) For none of the green fireballs has a train of sparks or a dust cloud been reported. This contrasts sharply with the behavior noted in case of meteoric fireballs--particularly those that penetrate to the very low levels where the green fireball of December 12 was observed.

2. In the year and a half since this list was prepared, many additional observations have been made, the total number of objects now accepted as belonging in the green fireball category being 72. (Although this number constitutes nearly 50% of the incidents listed in the accompanying Summary, it constitutes less than 5% of the total number of unscreened observations reported to the writer.) Critical analysis of all green fireball reports now available shows that only one of the statements in the list given in paragraph 1 needs to be modified, namely, item (1). Within the last year, a considerable number of the green fireballs have appeared to fall vertically downward rather than

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 29

report

This report page discusses the temporal distribution of green fireball sightings, compares them to ordinary meteor patterns, explores the hypothesis that they may be guided missiles from the USSR, and notes a decline in green fireball reports alongside an increase in 'flying saucer' reports.

CONFIDENTIAL

To: Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees - Page 3
Subj: Anomalous Luminous Phenomena (Seventh Report) May 23, 1950

to move horizontally. However, a strictly vertical infall is also very rarely observed in the case of genuine meteor falls.

3. An analysis just completed of the time distribution of the green fireballs so far observed permits us to add an 11th item to the list of differences given in paragraph 1 above. The graph of frequency versus local time which accompanies the present report shows that the maximum frequency of sighting of green fireballs (occurring at approximately 2030) coincides in time with neither the frequency maximum for ordinary meteors (occurring at approximately 0300) nor the frequency maximum for meteorite falls (occurring at approximately 1600).

4. Inspection of the graph referred to in paragraph 3 also will show that most of the green fireballs have been sighted in a time interval extending from about 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. (MST). This concentration might be even more pronounced if it were possible to screen out of the secondary maximum, around 2 a.m. (MST), all ordinary meteors which have been mistakenly identified as green fireballs. That such misidentification has occurred is strongly suggested by the near coincidence in time of the secondary maximum of the green fireballs and the well established early morning maximum of the ordinary meteors.

5. Some significance may attach to the fact that the time interval alluded to in paragraph 4 extends from about 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the Ural region of the USSR. Since missiles moving with velocities of the order of those found for the green fireballs for which real path determinations have been possible would travel from the southern Urals to New Mexico in less than 15 minutes, a possible interpretation of the concentration of sightings referred to in paragraph 4 is that the green fireballs result from guided missiles launched from bases in the Urals in the morning hours before cloudiness due to convection or blinding afternoon dust storms can interfere with non-radar tracking, such as has been used by the Optical Trajectory Section at White Sands Proving Ground.

6. There is also a pronounced concentration of green fireball incidents on the four days, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, almost all of the most widely observed incidents having occurred on Saturday or Sunday.

7. It is a curious and fairly well-established fact that there has been a distinct decline in the number of green fireball sightings during the last two months, within which the number of so-called "flying saucer" incidents in this region has attained an all-time high.

8. Although I have recently received from Dr. Joseph Kaplan of the Scientific Advisory Board a letter containing the statement "Frankly, I don't know of any U. S. experiments that would result in the appearance of these unconventional objects, and neither does Von Karman". I still

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 30

memo

This memo discusses the author's recommendations regarding the investigation of 'green fireballs,' suggesting they are either meteorites or U.S. guided missiles, and proposes specific scientists to lead further research.

CONFIDENTIAL

To: Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees - Page 4
Subj: Anomalous Luminous Phenomena (Seventh Report) May 23, 1950

consider the most probable explanation of the green fireballs to be the one given in the first of the three paragraphs below which are quoted from my letter of 1950, February 20, to Dr. P. H. Wyckoff, Chief Atmospheric Physics Laboratory, Base Directorate for Geophysical Research. The last two paragraphs quoted below well summarize my recommendations concerning the green fireball problem:

"As a preliminary to setting down the project recommendations which you requested, I have very carefully reviewed all available fireball data (observers' reports, transit measurements, calculated real paths, etc.) covering incidents from those of December 5, 1948 to the extraordinary incident of February 7, 1950, which has been under intensive investigation for the last two weeks. As a result of this comprehensive review, particularly as it relates to the incident of February 7, 1950, I feel compelled to write you in somewhat different terms concerning my own part in the proposed fireball project than I had in mind when we last discussed this matter. In brief, I have come to the conclusion that, on the basis of the evidence now available to me, I would not be justified in recommending a fireball project. In my opinion, this evidence proves conclusively that the fireballs reported on fall into one of two categories: Those of the first category (the majority) are meteorite falls of unusual, but certainly not of impossible, magnitude, frequency and other characteristics; those of the second category (the minority) are U. S. guided missiles undergoing tests in the neighborhoods of the sensitive installations they are designed to defend. This interpretation of the latter category is the one that I proposed in answer to a question raised by Dr. Teller at the first Los Alamos conference on February 17, 1949. It was not taken seriously then and I doubt that it will be taken seriously at the present time. However, even if my interpretation of the unconventional fireballs is the correct one, it is obvious that those in position to confirm it should refuse to do so."

"Only one other point need be stressed, namely, that if I am wrong in interpreting the guided missiles as of U. S. origin, then certainly intensive, systematic investigation of these objects should not be delayed until the termination of the present academic year. Recent international developments compel one to sense the imperative necessity of immediate investigation of the unconventional green fireballs, in case you are in possession of information proving that they are not U. S. missiles."

"If such an immediate investigation were to be undertaken, I would recommend that Dr. Fred L. Whipple, of Harvard College Observatory, be placed in charge of the photographic phase of the investigation; that Dr. Peter M. Millman, of the Dominion Observatory, be placed in charge of the spectrographic phase of the investigation;

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 31

memo

A letter from Lincoln LaPaz to Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees regarding recommendations for the investigation of anomalous luminous phenomena, including an offer to serve as a consultant on the green fireball project.

CONFIDENTIAL

To: Lt. Colonel Doyle Rees - Page 5
Subj: Anomalous Luminous Phenomena (Seventh Report) May 23, 1950

that Dr. L. A. Manning, of Stanford, and Dr. Millman be placed in
charge of the radar investigation; and, finally, that Dr. William
Crozier, of the New Mexico School of Mines, be placed in charge of
dust collection and identification. On the basis of many intensive
field surveys, I do not anticipate that ground search will lead to
any recoveries, but in case such ground search is to be attempted,
it should be carried out on the scale stressed in my conversations
with you and Major Oder last month."

9. Although the above paragraphs were written some months ago, the
recommendations contained in them are the ones I would urge you to con-
sider at the present time. In conclusion, I should like to repeat the
offer made at the end of my letter of February 20 to Dr. Wyckoff, namely
to serve, if needed, as consultant on the green fireball project as
suggested in Major Oder's letter to me under date of November 29, 1949,
with the stipulation, however, that my service be on a voluntary basis
rather than on the $40 per day contract specified in Major Oder's letter.

Lincoln LaPaz

Lincoln LaPaz, Director
Institute of Meteoritics
University of New Mexico

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 32

diagram

A graph plotting the number of observations over time for four categories: Meteorites, Meteors, Green Fireballs, and Disks or Variations.

CONFIDENTIAL

Legend
......... Meteorites
---- Meteors
____ Green Fireballs
-.-.- Disks or Variations

METEORITE MAXIMUM
METEOR MAXIMUM
GREEN FIREBALL MAXIMUM
DISK or VARIATION MAXIMUM

Number of Observations
TIME OF SIGHTINGS

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 33

report

This page contains a photograph and analysis of an unidentified aerial phenomenon sighted by Cpl Lertis E. Stanfield in Datil, New Mexico, in February 1950, as evaluated by Dr. Lincoln LaPaz.

Sighting No. 175

Photograph of Unknown Aerial Phenomena taken at Datil, New Mexico by Cpl Lertis E. Stanfield, Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico on 24 and 25 Feb 1950. An analysis of the above photograph was made by Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, Head of the Institute of Meteoritics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, who reached the following conclusions:

a. The angular diameter of the perfectly round luminous object Stanfield observed was approximately 1/4 of a degree.

b. The angular velocity of the object in the sky was greater than half a degree per minute.

Dr. LaPaz stated that on the basis of the results (a) and (b) above, the object seen by Stanfield was not the moon (for the angular diameter is too small), it was not Venus or any other planet (for the angular diameter is too large), and it was not a bright fixed star slightly out of focus (for the observed rate of motion is double that due to the diurnal rotation of the earth).

PAGE 34

report

A summary table of four UFO/UAP sightings reported by the 17th District Office of Special Investigations, including details on date, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
SUMMARY OF SIGHTINGS OF UNKNOWN AERIAL PHENOMENA
Reported by the 17th District Office of Special Investigations (AF), Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico

[TABLE DATA]

LEGEND:
*Reliability of Observers: VR - Very Reliable R - Reliable Unk - Unknown Reliability
**Evaluation: (1) "Green Fireball Phenomena" (2) "Disk" or Variation (3) Probable Meteor
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 35

report

A summary table of sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 14th District OSI, covering dates from October 24 to December 8, 1948.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 14th District OSI (cont)
Page 35
[Table data follows]
5 | 24 Oct | Night | 1 | Unk | Phoenix, Arizona | E to W | | | Green | | 75 mts. | | | Star | Very slow | Became very bright and fell apart
6 | 5 or 4 Nov | App 2200 | 1 | R | Vaughn, New Mexico | | 400' - 500' | Descending slowly in vertical manner | Bright White | | | None | Round | Larger than basket-ball | Descending slowly | Exploded
7 | 25 Nov | App 2200 | 1 | R | Vaughn, New Mexico | | 400' - 500' | Descending slowly in vertical manner | Bright white | | | None | Round | Larger than basket-ball | Descending slowly | Exploded
8 | 5 Dec | 2135 | 2 | R | Las Vegas, New Mexico | W to E | Slightly above 9,000' | Horizontal slightly descending | Whitish orange | | Few secs | | | | | | Disappeared
9 | 5 Dec | App 2200 | 2 | R | Albuquerque, New Mexico | No movement noted | 10,500' | Parabolic curve | Green | Yes | 2 secs | None | Round | | | Faded out
10 | 6 Dec | 2255 | 1 | Unk | Sandia Base, New Mexico | E to W | | Slight falling arch | Green | Yes | 2--3 secs | None | Round | 1/3 diameter of moon | Rapid | Vanished
11 | 8 Dec | 1833 | 2 | VR | Las Vegas, New Mexico | ENE to WSW | 13,500' | Horizontal | Bright green | Yes | 2 secs | None | | Larger than a flare | Rapid rate of speed | Faded out
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 36

report

A table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI between December 1948 and January 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 3
[TABLE DATA]
12 | 11 Dec 1948 | 1930 | Unk | Hood River, Oregon | | | | Blue & white | | | Yes | Flash | | | Flash w/ like thun
13 | 12 Dec 1948 | 2102 | 5 | VR | 15 miles south of Las Vegas, New Mexico | E to W | 8 - 10 miles | Horizontal | Very bright green | | 2.1-2.3 secs | None | Ball | Magnitude -4 | | Broke into 3 or 4 small fragments & disappeared
14 | 20 Dec 1948 | 2054 | 4 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | W to E | Great height descending | 20° to the horizon | Pale green or bluish white | Yes | 1-1/2 secs | None | Ball | Basketball | High speed | Disappeared behind mountain
15 | 28 Dec 1948 | 0431 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | N to S | Descended from high alt to 6000' | Descending in vertical path | white | | Sev. secs | None | Star | Star | Slower than falling star | Disappeared w/greenish flash
16 | 6 Jan 1949 | 1730 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | SE to NW | 1500' - 2000' | Horizontal | Bright white | | | None | Diamond | App. 2' long | Much faster than a jet | Disappeared
17 | 6 Jan 1949 | 0310 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | E to W | 3 to 5° from observer | Horizontal | Brilliant green | | 2 secs | None | | | High speed | Disappeared behind mountainous horizon
18 | 30 Jan 1949 | 1754 | App 200 | Unk | El Paso, Texas | NW to SE | 3° - 5° above horizon | Horizontal | Green | | | None | Ball | | | Broke into pieces
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 37

report

A table summarizing four sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in New Mexico and Texas during January and February 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District 034 (cont) Page 4

Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance
19 | 30 Jan 1949 | 1755 | App 200 | Unk | Roswell, New Mexico | W to E | 2000' | Horizontal | Blue-green | | | None | | | Moving slowly | Disappears to some. Disintegrated into shower of smaller lighted fragments
20 | 30 Jan | 1800 | App 200 | Unk & R | Alamogordo, New Mexico | E to S | Angle of elev. 15°-30° from observer. | Gentle descent | Green | | 3 - 15 secs | None | Ball | | | Seemed to fizzle out
21 | 30 Jan | 1854 1900 | 10 | Unk | Ft. Worth, Texas | N to S | 13° above horizon | 30° downward from horizon | Green trailing sparks | Yes | 1 - 7 secs | None | | 1/3 size of full moon | | Disintegration
22 | 14 Feb | 1840 | 2 | Unk | Canado, New Mexico | | Somewhat above horizon | Stationary then fell in slight curve to W | Brilliant white slightly green color | Yes | | None | | | | Stationary then fell in slight curve to W.

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 38

report

This page is a summary table of aerial phenomena sightings reported to the 17th District OSI, covering dates from February 17, 1949, to March 6, 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 5
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 39

report

A table summarizing six UFO sightings reported at Camp Hood, Texas, between March 6 and March 7, 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL

Summary of U.F.O. Sightings - Serial 65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 6

[Table data follows]

Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance

29 | 1949 6 Mar | 2020 | 2 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | N 40° E | 59° above horizon | | Blue-white light | | | None | Ball like flash | Basketball | "Fixed flash" |

30 | 6 Mar | 2045 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | From S 81° W to S 60° W | From 21° above horizon to 6°31' above | | Light colored head orange trail | Yes | | None | Round head with trail | About 10° in length |

31 | 7 Mar | 0115 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | N 40° E | 6° 15' above horizon | | Brillant blue-white | | | None | Like flash blub | Flash bulb |

32 | 7 Mar | 0130 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | N 16° W | 27° 30' above horizon | | Bright blue-white | | | None | Like flash bulb | Basketball | "Fixed flash" |

33 | 7 Mar | 0130 0200 | 2 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | S 20° W | 26° above horizon | | Bluish white | | | None | Ball like flash | Flash bulb |

34 | 7 Mar | 0145 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | N 60° E | | Dropped vertically to ground | Orange | | 2 secs | None | Tear-drop | 2' by 1' | Disappeared behind trees |

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 40

report

A table summarizing four UFO sighting reports from March 1949, detailing characteristics such as time, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL

Summary of [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE]

Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance | **Evaluation
35 | 1949 7 Mar | 1810 | 1 | Unk | Window Rock, Arizona | N | 40 - 45° to horizon | | Red (fire) in center shading to blue at edge | Yes | 6-8 secs | None | Ball round-spherical | 3' in diameter | 200-300 mph | Disintegrated | (1)
36 | 8 Mar | 1836 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | S to N | 12,000' to 15,000' | Horizontal | Bright white with greenish tint | | 1-2 secs | None | | | App 800 mph | Either went out or disappeared behind cloud |
37 | 8 Mar | 1835 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | S to N | 4,000 above terrain | Descending at 45° angle | Intense white light aluminum colored | | Very short | None | Elliptical pointed at ends | | Slower than twin-engined plane | Disappeared behind trees |
38 | 8 Mar | 0103 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | from S 58° E to S 54° E | From 58° above horizon to 54° above | Traveled in arc | Pale white light | Yes | | None | Roundish head w/hazy smoke trail | | | | (3)

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 41

report

This page is a summary table of UFO/UAP sightings recorded in March 1949, detailing location, time, appearance, and behavior of the objects.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance
1949
39 | 8 Mar | 0103 | 1 | Unk | Camp Hood, Texas | From N 56 W S 64 W | From 15 above horizon | Traveled in arc | Pale reddish nose whitish rod trail | Yes | | None | Lemon w/tail | | | Disappeared
40 | 13 Mar | 2153 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | NE to SW or SW to NE | 20 above horizon | Descending slightly | Bluish or greenish white | Yes | 2-4 secs | None | Length twice diameter of ball | 1/2 diameter of full moon | | 
41 | 14 Mar | 0900-16Z | 1 | R | Airplane enroute fr Honolulu to Canton Is | | 6-12 above airplane at 8,000 | Horizontal | | | 10 secs | None | Nose like bullet | | 65 in 9 secs | (1) (2)
42 | 27 Mar | 1800-1805 | 1 | Unk | Tucumcari, New Mexico | E to W | High in sky -app 30 above horizon | | Amber | None | 25 mnts | None | Long & narrow | | | Faded out in distance (2)
43 | 27 Mar | 1800 | 1 | Unk | Montoya, New Mexico | E to W | About 75 above | | Orange flame | None | 10 mnts | None | Long & narrow | Length about 1/6 lunar diameter, width-about 1/5 length | | Faded out in distance (2)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 42

report

A summary table of UAP sightings recorded between March 27, 1949, and April 7, 1949, in New Mexico and Texas.

CONFIDENTIAL

Summary

[Table of UAP sightings from 1949]

44 | 27 Mar | 1813 | 1 | R | Tucumcari, New Mexico | E to W | Close to 45° above horizon | | Bright orange | None | 15 mts | None | Long & narrow | | | Faded out of sight in distance
45 | 27 Mar | 1800 | 1 | Unk | Tucumcari, New Mexico | E to W | 60° above horizon | | Orange fire | None | 15 mts | None | Like kite tail | About size of C-47 at 10,000 ft. | | Disappeared behind hills
46 | 31 Mar | 2150 | 1 | R | Camp Hood, Texas | SW | Est. 2,000' | | Fire red to white | Yes | | None | Spher-ical | App. size of basket-ball | | 
47 | 5 Apr | 2200 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | S to N | App. 300' above S slope of Tejarito | Arc | Green w/red after glow | | ½ - 1 sec | None | | | Tremendous speed | Disappeared behind mountain
48 | 6 Apr | 1205 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | SE | About 15,000' | | Between dk & lt green | | 3 - 5 secs | None | | | Very fast | 
49 | 7 Apr | 0135 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | W | About 200 yds fr top of hill | | Green | | App 45 secs | None | | | Moved very slowly | 
50 | 7 Apr | 0100 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | S to N | | | Green | | 5 secs | None | | | | Moving slowly | 

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 43

report

This page is a continuation of a summary table documenting sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, listing specific details for cases 51 through 56 occurring in April 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (contd)
Page 10
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
51 | 12 Apr 1949 | 1930 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | SE to NW | 20° above horizon | | White | None | 8 secs | None | Round | 1/8 size of moon | 15° in 8 secs | Extinguished | (1)
52 | 15 Apr 1949 | 1630 | 1 | Unk | El Paso, Texas | Straight up | About 30° | | Gray-ish | Yes | 15 mts | None | Thin smoke trail | Very thin | | Dissipated | (2)
53 | 18 Apr 1949 | 0146 | 2 | R | Flagstaff & Williams, Arizona | NW | App 12,000' to one. 75 - 100 miles to other observer | | Green-ish blue | | 1 - 2 secs | None | Ball like | 100 watt light bulb | | Disappeared behind obstacle | (2)
54 | 22 Apr 1949 | 0905 | 1 | Unk | Cliff, New Mexico | W to E | 20° dropping slowly | | Aluminum | None | 2 mts | None | Round, flat thin, disc-shape | Over 15' in diameter | | Disappeared behind mountains | (2)
55 | 24 Apr 1949 | 1033 | 5 | VR | White Sands, New Mexico | | 25-29° | | White light yellow | None | 60 secs | None | Ellipsoid | | Tremendous rate of speed | Disappeared due to distance | (2)
56 | 25 Apr 1949 | 0630 | 2 | Unk | Springer, New Mexico | 2 groups going W 2 groups going E | Well above 30,000' | | Silvery white | None | 4 grps totaling about 20 sec | Yes | Round | Very small | Very fast well above speed of sound | Disappeared from view | (2)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 44

report

A table summarizing UFO sightings in the 17th District OSI, including dates, locations, and characteristics of the objects observed.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 11
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 45

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI, including dates, locations, and characteristics of the objects observed.

CONFIDENTIAL
Page 12
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)
[Table data follows]
62 | 6 May 1949 | 2040-2130 | 1 | R | Camp Hood, Texas | W and N | App 1200' dropping to 440' | | Alternating pinkish to green | None | 50 mts | None | Round | 1/2 dollar diminishing to short quarter size | Very slow | Faded from sight | (2)(1)
63 | 6 May | 0105 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | N to S | 50 above horizon | Was going down at an angle of 30-35 | Green | Fraction of a sec | None | Round | App 1/8 size of full moon | Very high rate of speed | Disappeared west of Jemez Mts. | (1)
64 | 7 May | 2025-2105 | 4 | R | Camp Hood, Texas | SE | 1300' | | Green-white | None | 40 mts | None | Diamond shape | 3 mils width | Covered 15 mils in 40 mins. horiz. | (2)(1)
65 | 7 May | 1940 | 1 | R | Camp Hood, Texas | N and E | 1000' | | Reddish greenish white | None | 57 sec | None | Diamond shape | 3 mils width | Covered 20 mils in 57 secs horiz. | (2)(1)
66 | 8 May | 2008-2017 | 1 | R | Camp Hood, Texas | N and E | 1600' | | Reddish greenish white | None | 9 mts | None | Diamond shape | 2 mils width | 10 mils in 9 mts | Dimmed and went out | (1)(2)
67 | 8 May | 0930-1100 | 4 | Unk | Tucson, Arizona | W, 90 turn to the N | 4000 to 20,000 | Horizontal then rapid climb at 45 angle | White | None | 10-20 mts | None | Metallic circular | 40-75' in diameter | Motionless to faster than jet | Climbed at 45 angle until out of sight | (2)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 46

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI, including dates, locations, and characteristics of the objects observed.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 13
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image for full content]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 47

report

This page is a continuation of a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena, listing details for cases 75 through 79 including date, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 14
Number Date Time Number of Observers *Reliability of Observers General Area of Occurrence Apparent Direction of Flight Apparent Altitude Course Horizontal to Vertical Color Train or Trail Duration of Observation Sound Shape Apparent Size Apparent Speed Manner of Disappearance
75 1949 24 Jun 1545 1630 2 Unk Mesa, Arizona 1 to SE 2 to E 3 to NE 4 vertical 5 to E 4 Horizontal 1 Vertical Steel gray 4 at 30 mts 1 at 25 secs None Disc w/2 flanges Max of 400 mph Faded from view
76 27 Jun 0138 1 R Albuquerque, New Mexico W to E 30° to 90° above horizon Similar to star Slightly more orange Yes 2 mts None Round Slightly larger than brightest star 140° in 2 mts. Went behind building (3)
77 29 Jun 2010 1 Unk Flagstaff, Arizona E to W 30° from vertical Yellow in front Red behind None None Bullet shaped 1/2 size of small air-plane Relatively slow Over a hill (1) (2)
78 30 Jun 1630 1 R Seligman, Arizona N 30° above horizon Dull grey None 8 secs None Circle Appeared 1 1/2 diameter at 10,000' altitude 2,000 mph or faster Disappeared in distance (2)
79 11 Jul 2110 1 Unk Camp Hood, Texas W by SW 30° above horizon Pale red None 2 secs None Ball - but not a perfect circle Twice as large as evening star Such as turning off flashlight (3)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 48

report

This page is a continuation of a summary table documenting sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, specifically listing sightings 80 through 84 occurring in Killeen and Camp Hood, Texas, in July 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) . Page 15
[Table of sightings 80-84]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 49

report

This page is a continuation of a summary of sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, detailing five specific sightings on August 6, 1949, in Las Cruces and Alamogordo, New Mexico.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 16
[Table headers omitted for brevity]
85 6 Aug 1949 2000 1 Unk Las Cruces, New Mexico E to W Bluish green Yes 1 - 2 secs None Round Bigger than falling star Disappeared behind building
86 6 Aug 1949 2000 1 Unk Las Cruces, New Mexico E to W 30 28" to 90 40" above horizon Curve going up then fell in almost vertical direction Reddish green Yes 4 - 5 secs None Round App 6" in diameter Disappeared gradually
87 6 Aug 1949 2000 1 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico Vertical 20 20" to 70 35" above horizon Straight vertical flight Bright white slight reddish cast None 3 secs None Round 1/2 size of moon Exploded then pieces died out (1)
88 6 Aug 1949 2000 2005 1 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico E to W 20 4" to 120 7" above horizon 100 off vertical White 2 secs None Large as auto spotlight at arm's length Disappeared behind building (1)
89 6 Aug 1949 2015 1 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico SW Straight flight app 200 vertical decline Whitish yellow (red trail) Yes 1 sec None Round Twice size normal falling star Extremely fast - twice as fast as falling star Disappeared behind mountain (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 50

report

A summary table of UFO sightings (numbered 90-95) reported to the 17th District OSI in August 1949, detailing characteristics such as time, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 17
Number Date Time Number of Observers Reliability of Observers General Area of Occurrence Apparent Direction of Flight Apparent Altitude Course Horizontal to Vertical Color Train or Trail Duration of Observation Sound Shape Apparent Size Apparent Speed Manner of Disappearance
90 6 Aug 1949 2030 1 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico N Constant slight curve earthward White (bluish) Yes 1 sec None Round App small- er than clenched fist Similar to falling star Wont out
91 6 Aug 1949 2020 1 Unk Albuquerque, New Mexico Descending to earth vertically 15° above horizon Descending to earth vertically Green None 1 - 1 1/2 secs None Round to pear shape 500 watt bulb about 1/5 mile away 10° in 1 1/2 secs at 2 miles Dissipated (1)
92 6 Aug 1949 2000 1 Unk White Sands, New Mexico 40° above horizon Straight line to earth Observer color blind None 1 sec None Round Half size of finger- nail at arm's length Slightly faster than ordinary falling star Disappeared behind sand dune (1)
93 6 Aug 1949 2000 1 R Alamogordo, New Mexico 200° 30° above horizon Long slow curve to earth Bluish green Yes 1 sec None Round Tip of thumb at arm's length Burned out (1)
94 10 Aug 1949 0010 2 Unk Killeen Base, Texas E to W 30° angle headed down 30° angle headed down Blue Yes 3 - 4 secs None Oval Head size Sudden disappearance (3)
95 10 Aug 1949 2030 1 Unk Killeen Base, Texas N to S 30° above horizon White Yes 5 secs None Similar to comet Disappeared (3)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 51

report

This page is a table summarizing five separate UFO sightings reported on August 10, 1949, near Camp Hood and Killeen Base, Texas, detailing characteristics such as time, direction, color, and duration.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 18
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 52

report

A table summarizing four sightings of unknown aerial phenomena near Camp Hood and Killeen Base, Texas, in August 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 53

report

This page is a continuation of a summary table of UFO sightings reported to the 17th District OSI in August 1949, detailing specific observations including location, time, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 20
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 54

report

This page is a table summarizing UFO sightings reported to the 17th District OSI in 1949, including dates, locations, and physical characteristics of the phenomena.

CONFIDENTIAL

Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)

Page 21

[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 55

report

This page is a continuation of a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI, listing sightings 117 through 122 occurring between September 27 and October 6, 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 22
[Table of sightings 117-122]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 56

report

This page is a table summarizing six sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in New Mexico on October 6, 1949, recorded by the 17th District OSI.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 23
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance
123 | 1949 6 Oct | 1800 1845 | 1 | Unk | Mescalero, New Mexico | | 18 degrees above horizon | | Green | None | 7 - 9 secs | None | Round | 1/2 size of thumb at arm's length | Moving slowly | Disappeared behind a hill
124 | 6 Oct | 1758 | 1 | R | Alamogordo, New Mexico | E to W | | Straight angular descent | Bluish white possibly lt. green tinge | None | 4 secs | None | Circular | 3 times the size of Jupiter or Venus | 5 degrees per sec. | (1)
125 | 6 Oct | 1800 | 1 | Unk | Alamogordo, New Mexico | | 40 degrees to 70 degrees | | Green | None | 5 - 6 secs | None | Round | Size of baseball at arm's length | | (1)
126 | 6 Oct | 1750 | 1 | R | Albuquerque, New Mexico | E to W | | Curved descent approaching vertical | Greenish white | None | 1 sec | None | Similar to very flare | 1/2 size of thumb at arm's length | Abrupt | (1)
127 | 6 Oct | 1750 | 1 | R | Wagon Mound, New Mexico | E to W | | Horizontal | Greenish white | None | 3 - 4 secs | None | Round | 1 1/2" - 2" in diameter | App. that of meteor | Went out like electric light (1)
128 | 6 Oct | 1758 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | NE to SW | | At tail end of its course it arched over and fell | Brilliant green | None | 10 secs | None | Teardrop | | | Seemed to burn out (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 57

report

A summary table of UFO sightings (numbered 129-134) reported in New Mexico during October 1949, detailing characteristics such as time, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 24
[Table of sightings 129-134]
129 | 7 Oct 1949 | 2120 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | Straight vertical drop | 35° above horizon | | Yellow to green | None | 1 sec | None | Round | Half a moon | Dropped 15° in 1 sec | Behind Sandia Mountains
130 | 10 Oct | 0406 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | SE to NE | 3,000' above observation pt. | Parallel to surface of earth | Brilliant white | Yes | 4 - 5 secs | None | Small | Appeared to be slower than a meteor | Disappeared
131 | 10 Oct | 0107 | 1 | Unk | Sandia Base, New Mexico | W to E | 45° above horizon | | Bluish green | Yes | 15 secs | None | Round | Size of fist at arm's length | Slow | Died out
132 | 10 Oct | 0107 | 1 | Unk | Sandia Base, New Mexico | SW to NE | 45° above horizon | Executed dives | Greenish blue w/red sparks trailing | Yes | 4 secs | None | Round | Size of fist at arm's length | Slow | Faded out | (1)
133 | 10 Oct | 0107 | 1 | Unk | Sandia Base, New Mexico | N to NE | 45° above horizon | | Green | None | 15 secs | None | Round | Size of fist at arm's length | Slow | Burned out | (1)
134 | 11 Oct | 2010 | 6 | Unk | Roswell, New Mexico | Appeared moving to N & angling slightly to E | | Maneuvered up & down | Light green turned orange | Yes | 45 mts | None | Round | Size of baseball | | | (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 58

report

A table summarizing five UFO sightings reported to the 17th District OSI in October 1949, detailing time, location, appearance, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 25
[Table headers omitted for brevity]
135 11 Oct 1949 1045-1100 2 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico NW to SE If size of B-29 appeared to be 150,000' White None 10-15 secs None Round dish shape 2" in diameter at arm's length Very fast compared w/falling star Faded from view (2)
136 12 Oct 1115 3 Unk Roswell, New Mexico S to NE 3,500' Smooth arc White (silver) None 45-60 secs None Round probably elliptical Faster than jet aircraft Went beyond range of vision (2)
137 12 Oct 1115 3 Unk Alamogordo, New Mexico Appeared from S & veered off to NE If size of B-29 appeared to be 35,000' Smooth arc White or aluminum None 45-60 secs None Round ball 35,000' 4" in diameter 1,500 mph Faded from view (2)
138 12 Oct 1340 4 R Tucson, Arizona From NE to SW 30,000' Horizontal White or silver None 15 secs None Round 50 - 100' in diameter 1,000 mph Faded from view (2)
139 14 Oct 1420 3 R Los Alamos, New Mexico W to E 20,000' Level flight just above horizon Greenish blue-white trail Yes 2 secs None Round Appeared as a 12" disc Burned out (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 59

report

This page is a continuation of a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, listing cases 140 through 146 occurring between October and November 1949.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 26
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 60

report

A table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI in November 1949, including locations in New Mexico and Arizona.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)
Page 27
[TABLE DATA]
147 | 19 Nov 1949 | 2152 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | Vertical | | | Green | | 2 secs | None | | | | |
148 | 25 Nov 1949 | 2000 | 5 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | E to W | 15° - 10° above horizon | Downward 10° from the horizontal | Yellowish green | | 2 secs | None | | | | Disappeared behind mt.
149 | 27 Nov 1949 | 1800 | 1 | Unk | McIntosh, New Mexico | Vertical | Less than 2,000' | Vertical descent | Green | None | 1 sec | None | Shaped like a signal flare | Same as signal flare | Same as falling signal flare | Same as signal flare (1)
150 | 27 Nov 1949 | 1730 | 1 | Unk | Winslow, Arizona | E to W | 30° above horizon | | Bright blue-white | Yes | 3 - 4 secs | None | Egg shape | Egg held at arm's length | 3 - 4 secs to cover 15° - 20° of horizon | Dwindled out (1)
151 | 27 Nov 1949 | 1749 | 1 | R | Albuquerque, New Mexico | E to W | 30° - 5° above horizon | Sloping descent | Blue-white | None | 1 - 2 secs | None | Round | Pencil era- ser at arm's length | 5° - 70 in 1 or 2 secs | Went out then on then out again (1)
152 | 27 Nov 1949 | 1749 | 1 | R | Socorro, New Mexico | E to W | 10° - 40° above horizon | Arc | Pale green to pale blue | Yes | 5 secs | None | Round | Quite large | Slower than meteor | Faded out gradually (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 61

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in New Mexico during December 1949, recorded by the 17th District OSI.

CONFIDENTIAL
Page 28
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance
1949 3 Dec | 1805 | 1 | R | Alamogordo, New Mexico | E to W | | In an arc downward | Green fringe of orange light | None | 2 secs | None | Circular | Somewhat larger than Venus | | Disappeared behind building | (3)
154 | 4 Dec | 1935 | 1 | Unk | Albuquerque, New Mexico | E to W | | Nearly horizontal | Green | None | 2 - 3 secs | None | Round | Marble at arm's length | | Went out like a candle | (
155 | 4 Dec | 1935 | 2 | Unk | Los Alamos, New Mexico | E to NE | | Sloping descent | Green | | 1/5 sec | Yes | Round | | | Disappeared behind mt. | (1) (3)
156 | 5 Dec 1945 | 1930 | 3 | Unk | Carrizozo, New Mexico | | 40 degrees above horizon | In dive | Blue-green | | | None | Teardrop | | Very slow | Disappeared | (1) (3)
| 5 Dec | 2240 | 1 | Unk | Tularosa, New Mexico | E to W | | Smooth arc downward | Blue w/yellowish red toward tail | Yes | 1 sec | None | Streak of light | Appeared little longer than length of lead pencil at 6' | | Appeared to hit ground near Tularosa, New Mexico | (1) (3)
158 | 9 Dec | 1330 | 1 | Unk | Farmington, New Mexico | Dropping vertically | 500 ft. | Vertically down | | | | None | Charred parachute or cargo net | | | Disappeared | (2)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 62

report

This document is a summary table of UFO sightings reported to the 17th District OSI, detailing four specific incidents occurring between December 1949 and January 1950 in New Mexico.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 29
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance
159 | 1949 13 Dec | 2005 | 3 | R | Alamogordo, New Mexico | Stationary then began to move downward slowly and to right | 5,000' | | White amber red green | None | 9 mts | None | Circular | 1 - 1 1/2 times size of average st. light at a distance of 8 miles | | Object took on brilliant green color, picked up speed and faded from view
160 | 1950 6 Jan | 2230 | 7 | R | Alamogordo, New Mexico | E to W | | Up & down and horizontal | White changed to green & red | None | 45 mts | None | Star like | Slightly larger than planet Venus | Moved app. 15° to 20° from E to W during 45 mins it was observed | Stopped observation
161 | 7 Jan | 2215 | 2 | Unk | Corona, New Mexico | From SW to SE | | Descending | Yellow-ish white orange blue gr. | Yes | 10 secs | None | Round ball shape | Same as cup 6" in diameter at arm's length | Compared w/fast jet fighter | Disappeared behind mt. range
162 | 9 Jan | 2226 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | | 80° - 40° above horizon | Horizontal | Incandescent green | Yes | 2 secs | None | Oval with trail | | | Disappeared behind trees
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 63

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI, covering dates from January 9, 1950, to February 7, 1950.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 30
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers | *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal to Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance | **Evaluation
163 | 9 Jan 1950 | 2220 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | Due W | 60° above horizon | Straight course | Bluish white | Yes | 2 secs | None | Pointed | Appeared as a point | 10° per second | Luminosity stopped suddenly | (1)
164 | 9 Jan 1950 | 2225 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | | 75° - 80° above horizon | Straight line | Greenish white | None | 3 secs | None | Round | 4 to 5 compared to Jupiter | 25° per second | Behind horizon | (1)
165 | 12 Jan 1950 | 1900 | 3 | Unk | Holloman, New Mexico | To W | | Changed altitude erratically | White changed to green & red | None | 5 mts | None | Star like | About same size of Venus | | Discontinued watching | (1) (2)
166 | 13 Jan 1950 | 0605 | 3 | Unk | Holloman AFB, New | E to W | | Erratic-ally up & down | White changed to green & red | None | Short time | None | Star like | About same size as Venus | | Disappeared w/daylight | (3)
167 | 27 Jan 1950 | 1715 | 1 | Unk | Scullville, New Jersey | NW | | Ascending at about 60° angle | White streak | | 30 mts | | | | 1/2 that of a fireworks rocket at close range | Faded gradually | (2)
168 | 7 Feb 1950 | 2015 | 2 | R | Albuquerque, New Mexico | SSE to E | 40° - 45° above horizon | Horizontal | Reddish green | Yes | 4 - 6 secs | None | Round elongated trail | Twice size of evening star | About same as falling star | Faded out in atmosphere | (1)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 64

report

This page is a table summarizing UFO sightings in the 17th District OSI during February 1950, including details such as date, time, location, and characteristics of the observed phenomena.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 31
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 65

report

This page is a table summarizing five UFO sightings reported on February 24, 1950, in New Mexico, including locations like Albuquerque, Datil, and Los Alamos.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District CSI (cont) Page 32
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
***See attached photograph.
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 66

report

This page is a continuation of a summary table documenting sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, listing specific sightings from February 24-25, 1950.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont)
Page 33

[Table data omitted for brevity, see image for full grid]

CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 67

report

A table summarizing UFO sightings in New Mexico and Arizona during February and March 1950, including details on time, location, appearance, and duration.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 34
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 68

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in the 17th District OSI, including dates, locations, and descriptions of the objects observed in March 1950.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 35
Number Date Time Number of Observers *Reliability of Observers General Area of Occurrence Apparent Direction of Flight Apparent Altitude Course Horizontal or Vertical Color Train or Trail Duration of Observation Sound Shape Apparent Size Apparent Speed Manner of Disappearance **Evaluation
1950
11 Mar 0100 1 R Holloman AFB, New App 270° About 30° above horizon at distance of 50 miles Straight flight Changed from light orange to blood red to amber to light green None 5 mts None Ping pong ball Ping pong ball held at arm's length Disappeared from view (2)
191 16 Mar 1100 10 Unk Farmington, New Mexico N to NE Turned on their axis & maneuvered up & down Bright luminous as tin foil None 3-5 mts None Flat spheric 1 to 6" Faster than conventional aircraft Discontinued observation (2)
? 16 Mar 1000 10 Unk Farmington, New Mexico NE Over 20,000' Skyward at 60°-80° Bright aluminum None 30 mts None Oval & long 1/16" - 1/2" held at arm's length Faster than conventional aircraft Gradually disappeared (2)
193 17 Mar 0310 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico Toward earth Toward earth Reddish then green None 1 sec None Appeared to fall to earth (3)
194 17 Mar 0308 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico NE Level flight Greenish yellow None 3 secs None Round 1/4 size of full moon Moderate Like light going out (3)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 69

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unknown aerial phenomena in New Mexico during March 1950, detailing characteristics such as time, color, duration, and behavior.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 36
Number Date Time Number of Observers *Reliability of Observers General Area of Occurrence Apparent Direction of Flight Apparent Altitude Course Horizontal to Vertical Color Train or Trail Duration of Observation Sound Shape Apparent Size Apparent Speed Manner of Disappearance **Evaluation
1950
17 Mar 0307 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico Straight down Straight down Orange & green Yes 2-2 1/2 secs None Tremendous Explosion on impact with earth or disintegration
196 17 Mar 0445 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico Formed an arc Formed an arc Green None 5 secs None Round Quite small Free fall Fell toward earth
197 17 Mar 0310 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico Seemed to climb, change color, start down & disappear Green turning to yellow None 5 secs None Spherical 1/4 size of moon Moderate Suddenly (3)
17 Mar 0307 1 R Los Alamos, New Mexico Earthward Earthward Yes 3 secs None Round 1/4 size of full moon Extremely fast Plunged to earth & 2 explosions were noted prior to disappearance (3)
199 20 Mar 0115 1 Unk Clovis, New Mexico From WNW Above 12,000' White w/light blue Yes 1-2 secs None Spherical 2,000 mph Disappeared from view (3)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 70

report

This page is a table summarizing five separate sightings of unknown aerial phenomena reported on March 21 and 22, 1950, near Sandia Base and Kirtland AFB in New Mexico.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 37
[Table data omitted for brevity, see image]
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 71

report

This page is a table summarizing sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena reported to the 17th District OSI, including dates, locations, and descriptions of the objects observed.

CONFIDENTIAL
Summary of Sightings of Unknown Aerial Phenomena, 17th District OSI (cont) Page 38
Number | Date | Time | Number of Observers *Reliability of Observers | General Area of Occurrence | Apparent Direction of Flight | Apparent Altitude | Course Horizontal or Vertical | Color | Train or Trail | Duration of Observation | Sound | Shape | Apparent Size | Apparent Speed | Manner of Disappearance | Evaluation
205 | 22 Mar 1950 | 0010 | 3 | Unk | Sandia Base, New Mexico | SE to NW | | Line parallel w/line tangent to the earth | Blue center with orange exterior | None | 1 1/2 secs | None | Round like ball from roman candle | | 1 1/2 secs 30 degrees azimuth | Burned out |
206 | 1 Apr | 0420 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | S to N | 75 degrees above horizon | | White light | None | 1 sec or less | None | Round | | | Disappeared behind building |
207 | 17 Apr | 1530 | 10 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | | 2,000' above horizon | Maneuvered up & down & from side to side | Light green bright as tin foil | None | 20-30 secs | None | | 1/16" at arm's length | | Gradually went out of sight | (1)
| 20 Apr | 1530 | 1 | R | Los Alamos, New Mexico | | | Maneuvered up & down | Bright metallic | None | 15-30 mts | None | Roughly circular | Est. 9' in diameter | Faster than conventional aircraft | Lost sight of object | (2)
209 | 1 May | 1510 | 2 | Unk | Kirtland AFB, New | SW to NE | Apparently a few thousand feet | Was angling downward | Silver lucid metallic object | None | Not quite a sec | None | Cylindrical | | Tremendous | Flash of brilliant white light | (2)
CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 72

memo

An urgent FBI teletype from Hoover to the Los Angeles SAC requesting an immediate investigation into Frank Scully, the author of the book 'Behind the Flying Saucers'.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

To: COMMUNICATIONS SECTION.
URGENT 10/18/50
Transmit the following message to:
SAC, LOS ANGELES

FLYING SAUCERS. REBUTELS OCTOBER THIRTEEN AND SEVENTEEN LAST.

SUTEL IMMEDIATELY RESULTS OF YOUR INVESTIGATION TO IDENTIFY FRANK
SCULLY, AUTHOR OF QUOTE BEHIND THE FLYING SAUCERS UNQUOTE.

HOOVER

EHM: jo

[HANDWRITTEN: Mr. Tolson, Mr. Clegg, Mr. Glavin, Mr. Ladd, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Rosen, Mr. Tracy, Mr. Egan, Mr. Gurnea, Mr. Harbo, Mr. Mohr, Mr. Pennington, Mr. Quinn Tamm, Tele. Room, Mr. Nease, Miss Gandy]

RECORDED - 44
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
INDEXED - 44
OCT 18 1950
EX-29
162-83894-25
OCT 20 1950
5
TELETYPE
52 NOV 1 1950
SENT VIA
COPIES DESTROYED
270 NOV 23 1964

PAGE 73

memo

A memo from the Knoxville FBI office to the Director regarding radar detection of unidentified objects over Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on October 12, 15, and 16, 1950.

Director, FBI
SAC, Knoxville

RADAR DETECTION OF UNIDENTIFIED
OBJECTS OVER OAK RIDGE, October 12,
15, 16, 1950
PROTECTION OF VITAL INSTALLATIONS
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]

Remytel October 13, 1950.

There is being submitted herewith a copy of two reports
made by District Representative of the OSI, 8th District, U. S.
Air Force, with regard to the detection of unidentified objects
by the means of radar, as set forth in referenced teletype. These
reports continue to set forth additional reports concerning
unidentified objects in the air space area over Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
which to date have not been explained.

No investigation is being conducted by the Knoxville Office
in this matter, but any further information received from OSI or
CIC representatives will be forwarded immediately.

Air Mail
CCM:jaw
65-475
Enc.

[HANDWRITTEN: 2040 8/31/77 HP]
[HANDWRITTEN: 36]
[HANDWRITTEN: INITIALS ON ORIGINAL]
October 18, 1950

PAGE 74

form

This is an FBI routing slip from 1950 with handwritten notes indicating the document should be filed in the 'Flying Saucer' file and that Air Intelligence requested information from other departments.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

CORRELATION & LI[REDACTED]ON SECTION

Date__________, 1950

[HANDWRITTEN: Mr. [ILLEGIBLE] Room 3208]
Director
Mr. Tolson
Mr. Ladd
Mr. Belmont
Mr. Laughlin

Mr. Keay
Mr. Bartlett

Mr. Baumgardner
Mr. Stanley
Mr. Hennrich

Miss __________
Room __________
Mrs. Abel [HANDWRITTEN: File in Flying Saucer file]
Miss Cuddy
Miss Reddy
Mrs. Schwab
Miss Wielkiewicz

Mr. Bromwell
Identification Division
Miss Harrington, Room 7229
Mail Room, Room 5533
Reading Room, Room 5531

Records Section [HANDWRITTEN: 5-E]
Routing Unit
Send file, up to date
Send reference

See Me
Phone Me
Please Handle

Mr. Ammarell
Mr. Bates
Mr. Blair
Mr. D. M. Brown
Mr. J. W. Brown
Mr. Cole
Mr. Connell
Mr. Conroy
Mr. DeLoach
Mr. Dinsmore
Mr. Ellis
Mr. Ferris
Mr. Fipp
Mr. Flaherty
Mr. Foley
Mr. Gotschall
Mr. Harrington
Mr. Ku hrtz
Mr. Landis
Mr. Lawrence
Mr. Lynch
Mr. Mansfield
Mr. Martin
Mr. Millard
Mr. Moynihan
Mr. Noone
Mr. Obenshain
Mr. Ormond
Mr. Reynolds
Mr. Roach
Mr. Sanders
Mr. Secord
Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Torrillo
Mr. Woods

[HANDWRITTEN: Air Intelligence has asked other departments to service to furnish this type info to them]

PAGE 75

other

A document fragment containing handwritten notes regarding AEC and A-2, with a partially visible Department of Justice stamp dated October 16.

[HANDWRITTEN: AEC [ILLEGIBLE] A-2 for study. ed.]

[STAMP: RE [ILLEGIBLE] OCT 16 21 [ILLEGIBLE] ESPIONAGE [ILLEGIBLE] U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE]

PAGE 76

form

This is a blank U.S. Atomic Energy Security Service form for reporting unidentified aerial objects, with some handwritten administrative notes and dates.

REPORT OF UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL OBJECTS
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY SECURITY SERVICE
LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO

DATE ________________, 195_
(Day) (Month)

[HANDWRITTEN: men]
1. Name of Observer __________________________________________________
Last First M.I.
Station assigned ____________________ Section ____________________
Home Address ________________________ Telephone __________________
Names of other known observers _______________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

2. Time and date of sighting ________ hours ________ ________ 195_
Day Month

[HANDWRITTEN: flying saucer]
3. Point of observation _______________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

4. Direction of object from observer __________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

5. Distance of object from observer ___________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

6. Angle of elevation from horizon ____________________ degrees
______________________________________________________________________

7. Direction of flight of object ______________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

8. Time in sight _____________________________________________________
9. Number of objects ________________ INDEXED - 17 [HANDWRITTEN: 162 83794 257]
10. Shape of object __________________ NOT RECORDED
11. Projections and/or indentations _________________ EX. - 68 [HANDWRITTEN: 5 OCT 23 1950]

[HANDWRITTEN: 51 NOV 15 1950]

PAGE 77

form

This is a page from a standardized report form for documenting unidentified aerial objects, containing numbered fields for physical and behavioral characteristics.

REPORT UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL OBJECTS (C[REDACTED]d).

12. Apparent construction____________________________________________________

13. Apparent means of support and/or propulsion_______________________________

14. Size of object___________________________________________________________

15. Luminosity of object_____________________________________________________
(Bright, very bright, glaring, etc.)

16. Color of object__________________________________________________________

17. Sound____________________________________________________________________

18. Odor_____________________________________________________________________

19. Speed____________________________________________________________________

20. Evidence of trail or exhaust______________________________________________

21. Effect on clouds_________________________________________________________

22. Tactics or maneuvers_____________________________________________________

23. Manner of disappearance__________________________________________________

24. What attracted attention to object________________________________________

25. Additional Remarks of observer____________________________________________

-2-

PAGE 78

PAGE 79

memo

An urgent FBI teletype from J. Edgar Hoover to the Los Angeles SAC requesting the results of an inquiry into Frank Scully regarding flying saucers.

[HANDWRITTEN: Jim]

October 17, 1950

SAC LOS ANGELES URGENT

FLYING SAUCERS. REBUTEL OCTOBER THIRTEEN LAST. SUTEL RESULTS OF

YOUR INQUIRY TO IDENTIFY FRANK SCULLY.

HOOVER

EHM:MH [HANDWRITTEN: mh]

[HANDWRITTEN: ABs]
[HANDWRITTEN: EHM]
[HANDWRITTEN: eHs]
[HANDWRITTEN: z]

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

RECORDED - 82

EX-29

62-83894

[HANDWRITTEN: 12-32 p Jnk]

[HANDWRITTEN: COPIES DESTROYED
270 NOV 23 1964]

PAGE 80

report

A news clipping report regarding a construction worker, Lee Robinson, who observed an unidentified blinking object over Los Alamos and reported it to the Atomic Energy Commission using a specialized form.

[HANDWRITTEN: men] [HANDWRITTEN: o Flying Saucers]

(SAUCER) --
DENVER--A CONSTRUCTION WORKER AT LOS ALAMOS, N.M., HAS REPORTED
THAT A STRANGE "BLINKING OBJECT" SOARED OVER A HIGHLY RESTRICTED AREA
OF THE BIG ATOMIC ENERGY CENTER.
LEE ROBINSON OF THE ARMEX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY SENT THE DENVER POST
A COPY OF A MIMEOGRAPHED FORM WHICH HE USED TO REPORT THE OBJECT TO THE
AEC.
THE FORMS ARE PREPARED BY THE AEC FOR "REPORTS OF UNIDENTIFIED
AERIAL OBJECTS AT LOS ALAMOS."
THE ORIGINAL THREE-PAGE REPORT, ROBINSON SAID, WAS SUBMITTED TO THE
ATOMIC ENERGY SECURITY SERVICE SEPT. 12., THE DAY ROBINSON AND
EIGHT OTHER EMPLOYEES OF THE ARMEX COMPANY SAY THEY SAW THE OBJECT.
ROBINSON SAID HE AND THE OTHERS WERE EATING LUNCH WHEN THE
UNIDENTIFIED OBJECT PASSED OVER. HE SAID IT "WAS NOT A BALLOON OR A
CONVENTIONAL TYPE OF AIRCRAFT."
ROBINSON SAID THE OBJECT APPEARED TO BE AT AN ALTITUDE OF ABOUT
20,00 FEET. IT ALTERNATELY FLASHED BRIGHT AND BLACK AT INTERVALS OF
TWO SECONDS, HE SAID, AND WAS VISIBLE FOR THREE MINUTES AND 40 SECONDS.
THE SPECIALLY MIMEOGRAPHED FORMS INDICATED THE AEC IS HIGHLY
CONCERNED WITH UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL OBJECTS OVER THE PROJECT. THE FORMS
CONTAIN SPACES FOR INFORMANTS TO REPORT ON LUMINOSITY OF OBJECT,
APPARENT MEANS OF SUPPORT AND PROPULSION AND "ODOR" OF THE OBJECT.
10/7--E1008A,

[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-]
NOT RECORDED
5 OCT 23 1950

[HANDWRITTEN: 55 NOV 14 1950]

PAGE 81

memo

An FBI memorandum from A. H. Belmont to Mr. Ladd regarding a discussion between Special Agent Edward S. Sanders and Major General Joseph F. Carroll of the OSI about the Air Force's involvement in flying saucer investigations.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : MR. LADD [HANDWRITTEN: checkmark]
FROM : A. H. BELMONT
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS
DATE: October 19, 1950
[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Clegg, Glavin, Nichols, Rosen, Tracy, Harbo, Belmont, Mohr, Tele. Room, Nease, Gandy]
[HANDWRITTEN: checkmark]
[HANDWRITTEN: CLAYTON]

The matter of flying saucers was discussed by Special Agent Edward S. Sanders with Major General Joseph F. Carroll of OSI on October 16, 1950, at which time General Carroll advised that insofar as he has been able to determine the Air Force is not working on any type of "flying saucer" or "flying disk". General Carroll stated that the Air Force is working on high altitude rockets and jet aircraft. He stated these experiments may account for some of the reports concerning flying saucers but that the Air Force is not apparently working on anything which is the cause of the many flying saucers reports. He stated that the Air Force program for investigating reports concerning flying saucers, etc., has been reinstituted at Wright Field and that any pertinent information of interest coming to his attention will be furnished to the Bureau.

RECOMMENDATION:

The foregoing is for your information.

ESS:ilw
[HANDWRITTEN: mjk]
[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-259]
RECORDED - 38
OCT 24 1950
EX-105 19
[HANDWRITTEN: 50 OCT 30 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: F V E S S]

PAGE 82

PAGE 83

memo

A memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Air Force regarding a report from Mr. Aaron L. Hitchens about a sphere-like UFO sighting in New Haven on October 20, 1950.

RECORDED - 19
November 24, 1950
62-83894-260
EX-16
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington, D.C.
[HANDWRITTEN: Declassified 8/31/77 HM]
From: J. Edgar Hoover, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Subject: FLYING DISCS
Mr. Aaron L. Hitchens, Chemical Engineer in charge of the Chemical and Physical Laboratories of the Winchester Repeating Arms Company, 275 Winchester Avenue, New Haven, advised the New Haven Office of this Bureau that on Friday, October 20, 1950, he, his wife, and daughter, who reside at 495 Edgewood Avenue, New Haven, went out of their home into the back yard at approximately 6:15 p.m. His young daughter called his attention to a star which was moving, and Mr. Hitchens noted a sphere-like object directly overhead that gave a steady golden-orange glow. He stated that this object was very high, being between ten to twenty thousand feet high, possibly higher. The glow given off was very steady, not blinking, and the whole sphere itself glowed in about the same consistency. He witnessed this object for approximately twenty seconds, during which time it traveled in a westerly direction toward New York City. It then veered in a southerly direction, as if crossing Long Island, or possibly in such a direction that it might have been traveling over Long Island. He lost sight of this object as it disappeared behind trees.
He advised the size of the object was approximately ten times the diameter of Venus, which was shining very brightly that night. He stated it was a very clear night and that all the stars in the sky were twinkling, as compared to the steadiness of the glow given off by this object. He advised that the object did not appear to diminish in size as it traveled farther away, but appeared to maintain about the same size as when he first
EHM: eas
[HANDWRITTEN: 59 NOV 29 1950]

PAGE 84

other

This page contains a handwritten note dated August 31, 1948, and an FBI mail room stamp dated November 24, 195[?].

[HANDWRITTEN: Confid. 8/31/48]

[HANDWRITTEN: Ex-18]

RECEIVED-MAIL ROOM
F B I
U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE
Nov 24 3 40 PM '5

PAGE 85

report

This document is a continuation of an interview with Mr. Hitchens regarding his sighting of a circular, orange, silent object, including his professional background and his assessment that the object was not the planet Venus.

noticed it directly overhead. The same steady orange glow persisted during the entire time that he witnessed it. Although this object was actually cut from his sight by nearby trees, Mr. Hitchens stated that it was so far away at that time that he probably would have lost sight of it very shortly. The object made no sound whatsoever, and there seemed to be no attachments or projections of any kind. Mr. Hitchens stated the object was a complete circular ball. He had no idea as to the method of propulsion, but advised that at the time it seemed to change directions, probably over New York City, and that it seemed to back up and go forward, possibly two or three times, in order to execute a change of direction. There were no clouds in the sky which interfered with his vision, and he could not comment as to whether or not this object penetrated or circumvented clouds. The object left no trail of any kind, and Mr. Hitchens mathematically calculated its speed at between 400 and 700 miles per hour, depending on the height, which he stated he could not accurately compute. He advised that he could not recall any odors and had no idea as to the construction of the object.

To Mr. Hitchens' knowledge, the only other persons in this area to have witnessed the object were his wife and daughter. Immediately upon sighting the object, Mrs. Hitchens ran to the door of neighbors occupying the same house as the Hitchens to bring them to the yard. However, these neighbors did not witness the object, since it disappeared before they got outside.

Mr. Hitchens stated that he is a Chemical Engineer and has fifteen years of experience in research and development. He is not a pilot, but has done considerable flying, and has also done considerable reading, including technical data concerning flying saucers and discs. He understands from reading the above matters that the star Venus is often mistaken by observers for flying saucers, and he pointed out that he feels that he is familiar with astronomy and did not confuse the object he saw with Venus, since he also recalled seeing Venus in the sky on that particular evening, and compared the size of this object as being ten times Venus' diameter. He also stated that he computed the speed at which this object was traveling by using points in his area, such as roof tops and tree tops, together with the distance he walked on the ground in order to keep the object in sight.

- 2 -

PAGE 86

memo

A memo documenting that Mr. Hitchens requested no public disclosure regarding his report of an object, and instructing the recipient office to keep the information confidential.

Upon receiving the above information from Mr. Hitchens, he was advised that this Bureau would turn the information over to another Government agency. Mr. Hitchens indicated his approval of this action, but specifically requested that no public announcement or comment be given to the fact that he had reported seeing the above object.

The above information has been furnished to your office for your confidential information and assistance in connection with the captioned matter. It is requested that no dissemination be made of this information.

- 3 -

PAGE 87

memo

An FBI memorandum detailing a witness report from Aaron L. Hitchens regarding a sphere-like object observed in the sky over New Haven on October 20, 1950.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : DIRECTOR, FBI
DATE: November 9, 1950
[HANDWRITTEN: HNW] FROM : SAC, NEW HAVEN
SUBJECT: FLYING DISCS
AARON L. HITCHENS, INFORMANT

The following is being brought to the attention of the Bureau so that it may be referred to the Department of the Air Force in connection with instructions set forth in SAC Letter No. 38, Series 1949, dated March 25, 1949.

Mr. AARON L. HITCHENS, Chemical Engineer in charge of the Chemical and Physical Laboratories of the Winchester Repeating Arms Co., 275 Winchester Avenue, New Haven, was interviewed in connection with other official business and furnished the following information:

He advised that on Friday, October 20, 1950, he and his wife and daughter, who reside at 495 Edgewood Avenue, New Haven, went out of the back door of their home to the back yard at approximately 6:15 P.M. His little daughter called his attention to a star in the sky that was moving and Mr. HITCHENS noted a sphere-like object directly overhead which gave a steady golden orange glow. He stated that this object was very high between ten to twenty thousand feet, possibly higher. The glow given off was very steady and not blinking and the whole sphere itself glowed in about the same consistency. He witnessed this object for approximately twenty seconds during which time it traveled in a westerly direction toward New York City and then when Mr. HITCHENS believed that possibly it was near or over New York City, it then veered in a southerly direction as if crossing Long Island or possibly in such a direction that it might have been traveling over Long Island. He lost sight of this object as it disappeared behind trees in his vicinity. He advised that as to the size of the object, it was approximately ten times the diameter of Venus, which was shining very brightly that night. He states it was a very clear night and that all the stars in the sky were twinkling as compared to the steadiness of the glow given off by this object. He advised that the object did not appear to diminish in size as it traveled farther away from him but appeared to maintain about the same size as when he first noticed it directly overhead. The same steady orange glow persisted during the entire time that he witnessed it. Although this object was actually cut from his sight by nearby trees, Mr. HITCHENS states that it was so far away from him any way that he probably would have lost sight of it very shortly due to distance had the trees not intervened. The object made no sound whatsoever
RECORDED - 102-
[HANDWRITTEN: MHF:FGM] INDEXED 102 62-83894-260
NOV 13 1950
[HANDWRITTEN: 8] [HANDWRITTEN: EX-89] [HANDWRITTEN: Rec'd 11/14/50] [HANDWRITTEN: LRD 51 11/21/50] [HANDWRITTEN: EAM/KRS]

PAGE 88

cover-page

This page is a blank cover sheet containing only FBI date stamps from November 1947.

RECEIVED
NOV 17 3 47 PM '47
INTERNAL SECURITY - ESPIONAGE
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED
9 43 AM '47
NOV 28 1 38 PM
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

PAGE 89

letter

This document is a continuation of a report regarding a witness, Mr. Hitchens, who observed a circular, unidentified object. It details his observations, his background as a chemical engineer, his comparison of the object to the planet Venus, and his request for anonymity.

Letter to the Director                                          11/9/50

and there seemed to be no attachments or projections of any kind, just
a complete circular ball. He had no idea as to the method of propulsion
but advised that at the time it seemed to change directions, probably over
New York City, that it had seemed to back up and go forward, possibly two
or three times in order to execute a change of direction. There were no
clouds in the sky that interfered with his vision of this object and he
could not comment as to whether or not this object penetrated or circum-
vented clouds. The object left no trail of any kind and Mr. HITCHENS
mathematically calculated its speed at between four hundred and seven
hundred miles per hour, depending on the height which he stated he could
not accurately compute. He advised that he could not recall any odors
and had no idea as to its construction. To his knowledge the only other
persons in this area to have witnessed this object were his wife and
daughter. Immediately upon sighting the object, his wife ran to the door
of neighbors occupying the same house as the HITCHENS to bring them to
the yard. However, these neighbors had not witnessed the object as by
the time they got outside the object had disappeared.

Mr. HITCHENS stated that he is a Chemical Engineer, has fifteen years
of experience in research and development. He is not a pilot but has
done considerable flying and has also done considerable reading, includ-
ing technical data concerning flying saucers and discs. He understands
from reading the above matters that the star Venus is often mistaken
by observers for flying saucers and he pointed out that he feels that he
is familiar with astronomy not to confuse the object he saw with Venus
as he also recalls Venus in the sky on that particular evening and compared
the size of this object as being ten times Venus' diameter. He also states
that he computed the speed at which this object was traveling by using
points in his area, such as, roof tops and tree tops together with the dis-
tance he walked on the ground in order to keep the object in sight.

Mr. HITCHENS was advised that the Bureau would turn this information over
to another agency and indicated that this was according to his approval.
He specifically requested that no public announcement or comment be given
to the fact that he had reported seeing the above object. Mr. HITCHENS
appeared to be a very reliable and sincere individual and evidences con-
siderable technical knowledge and experience in reporting the above inci-
dent.

-2-

PAGE 90

memo

An FBI memo detailing a witness report from Aaron L. Hitchens regarding a sphere-like object observed in the sky over New Haven on October 20, 1950.

DIRECTOR, FBI
November 9, 1950
SAC, NEW HAVEN
FLYING DISCS
AARON L. HITCHENS, INFORMANT

The following is being brought to the attention of the Bureau so that it may be referred to the Department of the Air Force in connection with instructions set forth in SAC Letter No. 38, Series 1949, dated March 25, 1949.

Mr. AARON L. HITCHENS, Chemical Engineer in charge of the Chemical and Physical Laboratories of the Winchester Repeating Arms Co., 275 Winchester Avenue, New Haven, was interviewed in connection with other official business and furnished the following information:

He advised that on Friday, October 20, 1950, he and his wife and daughter, who reside at 495 Edgewood Avenue, New Haven, went out of the back door of their home to the back yard at approximately 6:15 P.M. His little daughter called his attention to a star in the sky that was moving and Mr. HITCHENS noted a sphere-like object directly overhead which gave a steady golden orange glow. He stated that this object was very high between ten to twenty thousand feet, possibly higher. The glow given off was very steady and not blinking and the whole sphere itself glowed in about the same consistency. He witnessed this object for approximately twenty seconds during which time it traveled in a westerly direction toward New York City and then when Mr. HITCHENS believed that possibly it was near or over New York City, it then veered in a southerly direction as if crossing Long Island or possibly in such a direction that it might have been traveling over Long Island. He lost sight of this object as it disappeared behind trees in his vicinity. He advised that as to the size of the object, it was approximately ten times the diameter of Venus, which was shining very brightly that night. He states it was a very clear night and that all the stars in the sky were twinkling as compared to the steadiness of the glow given off by this object. He advised that the object did not appear to diminish in size as it traveled farther away from him but appeared to maintain the same size as when he first noticed it directly overhead. The same steady orange glow persisted during the entire time that he witnessed it. Although this object was actually cut from his sight by nearby trees, Mr. HITCHENS states that it was so far away from him any way that he probably would have lost sight of it very shortly due to distance had the trees not intervened. The object made no sound whatsoever

MHF:FGM

PAGE 91

letter

This document is a continuation of a report detailing a witness account by Mr. Hitchens regarding a circular object he observed, including his technical estimation of its speed and his request for anonymity.

Letter to the Director                                          11/9/50

and there seemed to be no attachments or projections of any kind, just
a complete circular ball. He had no idea as to the method of propulsion
but advised that at the time it seemed to change directions, probably over
New York City, that it had seemed to back up and go forward, possibly two
or three times in order to execute a change of direction. There were no
clouds in the sky that interfered with his vision of this object and he
could not comment as to whether or not this object penetrated or circum-
vented clouds. The object left no trail of any kind and Mr. HITCHENS
mathematically calculated its speed at between four hundred and seven
hundred miles per hour, depending on the height which he stated he could
not accurately compute. He advised that he could not recall any odors
and had no idea as to its construction. To his knowledge the only other
persons in this area to have witnessed this object were his wife and
daughter. Immediately upon sighting the object, his wife ran to the door
of neighbors occupying the same house as the HITCHENS to bring them to
the yard. However, these neighbors had not witnessed the object as by
the time they got outside the object had disappeared.

Mr. HITCHENS stated that he is a Chemical Engineer, has fifteen years
of experience in research and development. He is not a pilot but has
done considerable flying and has also done considerable reading, includ-
ing technical data concerning flying saucers and discs. He understands
from reading the above matters that the star Venus is often mistaken
by observers for flying saucers and he pointed out that he feels that he
is familiar with astronomy not to confuse the object he saw with Venus
as he also recalls Venus in the sky on that particular evening and compared
the size of this object as being ten times Venus' diameter. He also states
that he computed the speed at which this object was traveling by using
points in his area, such as, roof tops and tree tops together with the dis-
tance he walked on the ground in order to keep the object in sight.

Mr. HITCHENS was advised that the Bureau would turn this information over
to another agency and indicated that this was according to his approval.
He specifically requested that no public announcement or comment be given
to the fact that he had reported seeing the above object. Mr. HITCHENS
appeared to be a very reliable and sincere individual and evidences con-
siderable technical knowledge and experience in reporting the above inci-
dent.

-2-

PAGE 92

memo

An FBI teletype report regarding the radar detection of eleven unidentified objects over the Oak Ridge atomic energy installation on October 12, 1950.

copy;bw

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

OCT 13 1950

TELETYPE

SAC, KNOXVILLE 10-13-50 8-26 PM JYC

DIRECTOR, FBI U R G E N T
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
RADAR DETECTION OF UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS OVER OAK RIDGE OCTOBER TWELVE,
NINETEEN FIFTY, PROTECTION OF VITAL INSTALLATIONS. USAF RADAR INSTALL-
ATION AT KNOXVILLE AT ELEVEN TWENTYFIVE PM, EST, OCTOBER TWELVE, PICKED
UP INDICATIONS OF ELEVEN OBJECTS AND PERHAPS MORE TRAVELING ACROSS
CONTROLLED AREA OF ATOMIC ENERGY INSTALLATION AT OAK RIDGE. ALTITUDE
OF OBJECTS VARIED FROM ONE THOUSAND TO FIVE THOUSAND FEET, COURSES
FROM SOUTH SOUTH EAST TO SOUTHEAST, AND DENSITY FROM READING MADE BY
LIGHT AIRCRAFT TO AIRCRAFT EQUAL IN SIZE TO C FORTY SEVEN, SPEED
FROM ONE HUNDRED TO ONE HUNDRED TWENTYFIVE MILES PER HOUR. FIGHTER
PLANE ATTEMPTED TO INTERCEPT IN FEW MINUTES AND RADAR SCREEN REFLECTED
CONTACT, BUT PLANE REPORTED NO OBJECT COULD BE SEEN EITHER VISUALLY
OR ON PLANES RADAR SCREEN. AEC PATROL WAS ALERTED BUT NO OBJECTS COULD
BE VISUALLY SIGHTED BY THEM OVER THE AREA OTHER THAN THE AIR
FORCE INTERCEPTOR. OSI AND EASTERN AIR DEFENSE FORCES HAVE BEEN
ADVISED AND ARE CHECKING INCIDENT. NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR
RADAR READINGS YET DEVELOPED ALTHOUGH OPERATORS ARE EXPERIENCED
RELIABLE PERSONNEL AND RADAR SET IS IN PERFECT OPERATING CONDITION.
BUREAU WILL BE ADVISED OF FURTHER DEVELOPEMENTS.

ROBEY

ACK AND HOLD PLS

8-31 PM OK FBI WASH DC GAR

[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-261]
[HANDWRITTEN: NOT RECORDED]
[HANDWRITTEN: 1950 NOV 22]
[HANDWRITTEN: INITIALS ON ORIGIN]
[HANDWRITTEN: 5 DEC 7 1950]

PAGE 93

memo

An FBI teletype from Director Hoover to the Knoxville SAC regarding the investigation of unidentified objects over the Oak Ridge area and their potential connection to radar jamming.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
DEC 5 1950
TELETYPE

FBI WASHINGTON DC 12-5-50 4-47 PM GAR
SAC, KNOXVILLE URGENT
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
DETECTION OF UNIDENTIFIED OBJCXXX OBJECTS OVER OAK RIDGE AREA, PROTECTION OF VITAL INSTALLATIONS. REURTEL DECEMBER FOUR LAST REGARDING POSSIBLE RADAR JAMMING AT OAK RIDGE. ARRANGEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE TO OBTAIN ALL FACTS CONCERNING POSSIBLE RADAR JAMMING BY IONIZATION OF PARTICLES IN ATOXXX ATMOSPHERE. CONDUCT APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER INCIDENT OCCURRING NORTHEAST OF OLIVER SPRINGS, TENNESSEE, COULD HAVE HAD ANY CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED RADAR JAMMING. SUTEL IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS.
HOOVER
END
CORRECT LAST WORD FIRST LINE PLS
-PROTECTION
OK D FBI KX OLO
[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-]
[HANDWRITTEN: NOT RECORDED]
[HANDWRITTEN: 1950-DEC-20]
[HANDWRITTEN: ORIGINAL COPY FILED IN 65-58300-141]

PAGE 94

memo

A teletype from the FBI Richmond office to the Director regarding Army Intelligence being placed on high alert for information concerning flying saucers.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
DEC - 8 1950
TELETYPE

FBI, RICHMOND 12-8-50 12-09 PM G. I. MEW-1
DIRECTOR URGENT
RE FLYING SAUCERS. THIS OFFICE VERY CONFIDENTIALLY ADVISED BY ARMY
INTELLIGENCE, RICHMOND, THAT THEY HAVE BEEN PUT ON IMMEDIATE HIGH
ALERT FOR ANY DATA WHATSOEVER CONCERNING FLYING SAUCERS. CIC HERE
STATES BACKGROUND OF INSTRUCTIONS NOT AVAILABLE FROM AIR FORCE
INTELLIGENCE, WHO ARE NOT AWARE OF REASON FOR ALERT LOCALLY,
BUT ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER MUST BE TELEPHONED BY THEM IMMEDIATELY
TO AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE. CIC ADVISES DATA STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
AND SHOULD NOT BE DISSEMINATED.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-269]
AUERBACH
RECORDED - 81
DEC 13 1950
EX-46

12-11 PM OK FBI WA NRJ
[HANDWRITTEN: 12/12/50 Sanders adv no request from [ILLEGIBLE] for Bur re this EJM]
[HANDWRITTEN: 65 DEC 19 1950]
[HANDWRITTEN: cc Hemmich]

PAGE 95

other

This page consists of a collection of various FBI date-received stamps and routing notations from December 1950.

CORRELATION-LIAISON
F.B.I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 11 9 22 AM '50

RECEIVED-NICHOL
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUS
DEC 9 10 37 AM '50

REC'D BELMONT
F.B.I.
DEPT OF JUSTICE
DEC 9 1 05 PM '50

RECEIVED-LADD
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 9 9 07 AM '50

RECEIVED-TELETYPE UNIT
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 8 12 11 PM '50

RECEIVED-TOLSON
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUSTICE
DEC 8 5 48 PM '50

REC'D BELMONT
F.B.I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 8 12 34 PM '50

RECEIVED
REC'D ESPIONAGE
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 8 3 39 PM '50

RECEIVED-LADD
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUSTICE
DEC 8 1 51 PM '50

RECEIVED
REC'D ESPIONAGE
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
DEC 12 11 46 AM '50

PAGE 96

memo

An FBI memo from the Knoxville SAC to the Director regarding the submission of CIC reports concerning unidentified objects observed at Oak Ridge in October 1950.

DIRECTOR, FBI [HANDWRITTEN: CONFIDENTIAL] November 4, 1950
SAC, KNOXVILLE [HANDWRITTEN: declassified 2048 8/31/77 HP]
DETECTION OF UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS
AT OAK RIDGE, October 20,23,24,26, 1950
PROTECTION OF VITAL INSTALLATIONS
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
Remylet October 18, 1950.

Submitted herewith is copy of CIC reports on above
caption matter. Further information as received will be forwarded
to Bureau.

Encl. (Air Mail)
CCM:JF
65-475

[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-V]
RECORDED
98 1950 NOV 22
[HANDWRITTEN: 6DEC 2 1950] [HANDWRITTEN: INITIALS ON ORIGINAL]

PAGE 97

memo

A military message from Alaska Air Command reporting a sighting of a cigar-shaped object by jet pilots near Fairbanks on December 15, 1950.

CLASSIFIED INCOMING MESSAGE

[HANDWRITTEN: Mr. Hepprich FBI]
CONFIDENTIAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
RECEIVED FROM G-2 THROUGH LIASON CHANNELS
DATE 12/15/50 [HANDWRITTEN: Cub R]
[HANDWRITTEN: ref/]
PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED
PRIORITY
FROM: CGUSARAL FT RICHARDSON ALASKA FROM ARGSI
TO: DEPTAR WASH DC FOR ACOFS G2
DTG: 150345Z 15 DEC 50
[HANDWRITTEN: G. I. R. -1]

Alas Air Comd reports military jet pilots vic Fairbanks while over Weeks International Field at an altitude of 8000 feet observed a flash of light, yellow in color at an altitude between 25,000 and 30,000 feet. Horizontal distance to object was aprx 50 miles. Soon after flash a dark brown smoke appeared to rise or climb at an angle of 40 degrees. At the leading edge of the smoke at aprx 100 feet appeared an object either cigar shaped or a fuselage without wings travelling at terrific speed. Pilots started pursuit on heading of 210 degrees mag, indicating 380 at a very steep climb. Pursuit continued until pilots reached village of clear and lost sight of object. Meantime object gained altitude and speed and disappeared because of distance of aprx 50 to 55,000 feet. Color of smoke brown, color of object dark and no reflection from sunlight. Pilots assured of shape because of perfect silhouette against the sun. One pilot had object in view aprx 4 1/2 mins. First sighted at 150026Z. Coordinates 64 degs 13 mins North, 149 degs 30 mins West. Add info will be fwd when obtained.

[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894 NOT RECORDED 37 DEC 21 50]
[HANDWRITTEN: Mossburg]
[HANDWRITTEN: Boks]
[HANDWRITTEN: 5-Eth]
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Disc file]
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Disc]
ACTION: G2
INFO: G3, AF
CM IN 932 (15 Dec 50) DTG: 150345Z rvk/7
141 DEC 15 50 27
OCS FORM 270-1 1 JAN 50 [HANDWRITTEN: feb] [HANDWRITTEN: 01 DEC 27 1950]
CONFIDENTIAL COPY NO.
REPLACES DA SCO FORM 22-3, 15 JAN 49. WHICH MAY BE USED. U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1950-O-868129

PAGE 98

other

A document page indicating a change in file reference numbers, dated January 26, 1951.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-263]
CHANGED TO
[HANDWRITTEN: 100-2244-8]

[HANDWRITTEN: 343]
5 JAN 26 1951

PAGE 99

other

This page contains a cross-reference note indicating that file 62-83894-264 has been changed to 62-93979-1, dated March 2, 1951.

[HANDWRITTEN: 7] - MAR 2 1951

62-83894-264

CHANGED TO

62-93979-1

[HANDWRITTEN: C]

PAGE 100

memo

An FBI memorandum from the Knoxville office to the Director regarding the forwarding of CIC reports about unidentified objects sighted over the Oak Ridge area.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO: DIRECTOR FBI
FROM: SAC KNOXVILLE
SUBJECT: UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS OVER OAK RIDGE AREA, PROTECTION OF VITAL INSTALLATIONS
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
Re Knoxville letter dated 12-13-50.

DATE: 2-10-51

For information of the Bureau, the below listed copies of CIC, G-2 Third Army, pertaining to captioned matter are forwarded herewith.

Report of SAC WILLIAM B. GRAY, CIC, dated 1-2-51, entitled "Object Sighted Over Oak Ridge, Tennessee."

CIC reports dated 1-20-51, entitled "Objects Sighted Over Oak Ridge, Tennessee".

Enclosures - 2
65-475
CCM/wj

[HANDWRITTEN: 4-1]
[HANDWRITTEN: G. I. R. -7]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62 83894-265]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 42 FEB 13 1951]
[HANDWRITTEN: 2040 9/1/77]
[HANDWRITTEN: 65-393 FEB 19 1951]
[HANDWRITTEN: UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN 65-]

PAGE 101

report

This report summarizes a sighting of an unconventional aircraft over Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on December 18, 1950, including witness names, weather conditions, and a description of the object.

CONFIDENTIAL
COPY/WJ
2-10-51
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
111th CIC, FAO # 8, P. O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee.
OBJECT SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE.
(In compliance with letter AJACI-360.33 General, dated 15 November 1950,
Headquarters, Third Army. SUBJECT: Unconventional Aircraft, the following is
submitted.)
A. Location and Time of Sighting:
Between 0820 and 0830 hours on 18 December 1950, on the Turnpike,
within the controlled area, approximately one (1) mile from the White
Wing entrance and Y-12 plant.
B. Weather at the Time:
At 0730 hours - wind from the Northeast, seven (7) miles per hour;
temperature - 20 degrees F. according to the Atomic Energy Commission
Meteorological Division.
C. Names, Occupations, and Addresses of Witnesses:
Dr. A. J. Miller, 518 Delaware Avenue, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Dr. V. P. Calkins, 105 Disston Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Mr. J. Frank Coneybear, 119 Meadow Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Mr. A. O. Mooneyham, 101 Dewey Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Mr. F. T. Bly, 221 Villanova Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Lt. Col. John R. Hood, U.S.A.F., 200 Virginia Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Cdr. E. W. Hribar, U.S.N., 103 Norris Lane, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Maj. Walter L. Carss, U.S.A.F., NEPA Division, Fairchild Engine and
Airplane Corporation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
D. Photographs of Objects, if available:
None.
E. Object Sighted:
A light amanating in the shape of a circle, of an intensity much greater
that that of a bright moon, giving the impression of form in connection with
the light. The light was white in appearance and did not show any signs of
refraction into a band or continuous spectrum. This object was traveling in
a Northwesterly direction, 15 to 30 degrees elevation above the horizon, and
appeared to dimminish considerable in size during thirty seconds of observation.
To another group, the object appeared only as a bright reflection of the sun
from an apparently metal surface. No accurate estimate of the object's size
or range could be made from the observation.
F. Any other pertinent information:
Following is quoted from the Radar Log maintained by the McGhee Tyson
Air Force Radar Station:
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-265]
ENCLOSURE

PAGE 102

memo

This memo from the 111th CIC in Knoxville, Tennessee, details a timeline of radar sightings of unidentified aircraft over Oak Ridge on January 2, 1951, and notes that fighter interception was attempted without success.

2 January 1951

111th CIC, FAO #8, P. O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee.

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE.

F. (Continued)

"0832 hours - Atomic Energy Commission reported aircraft over
Northeast end of area - no paint. (Paint meaning indication on the radar
scopes.)

"0839 hours - Small paint near Southeast corner of area on 190 degree.
(Magnetic bearing of objects travel.)

"0845 hours - Lost contact. Fighter interception was attempted with
negative results."

Attached hereto are two certified true copies of the statements made
by the above mentioned observers.

Attachments - 2

2

PAGE 103

report

A witness statement from six personnel regarding an unidentified bright reflection sighted near the Oak Ridge NEPA Division on December 18, 1950.

STATEMENT

Following is a report of the sighting of an unidentified
object in the Oak Ridge Area by the undersigned. On the morning of
18 December 1950, the following personnel were riding to their work
at NEPA Division, Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corp., in the S-50
Area at Oak Ridge, Tennessee:

Lt. Col. John R. Hood, USAF
Cdr. E. W. Hribar, USN
Major James L. Steele, USAF
Jamor Walter L. Carss, USAF
Mr. James R. Gray
Mr. William G. Frey

Mr. Gray, Commander Hribar, and Major Steele were riding in the front
seat; Col. Hood, Major Carss, and Mr. Frey were in the rear.

At approximately 0827, while riding southwest on the turnpike
just outside the restricted area, Col. Hood sighted a very bright
reflection through the windshield of the car. Major Carss, who was sit-
ing beside Col. Hood and whose attention was attracted by Col.
Hood's looking at the sky, sighted the same reflection. Col. Hood then
called the attention of the remaining occupants of the car to the
reflection. Of these, Commander Hribar also sighted the reflection,
but Mr. Gray, Mr. Frey, and Major Steele did not sight it.

The reflection was visible through the front windshield of the
car only for a moment because, shortly thereafter, the road turned to
the right. The corresponding turn of the car so placed the relative
position of the reflection that it could not be seen through the left
front window, which was frosted. The windshield, however, was not
frosted and permitted excellent vision.

The object appeared only as the bright reflection of the sun from
an apparently metal surface, much as might be expected from an aircraft
at a great distance. No accurate estimate of the objects size or range
could be made from the observation. It appeared to be west-southwest
of Oak Ridge Townsite at an angle of elevation of about 25 degrees from
the level.

s/John R. Hood, Jr. t/JOHN R. HOOD, JR., Lt. Col. USAF
s/Edward W. Hribar t/EDWARD W. HRIBAR, Commander, USN
s/Walter L. Carss t/WALTER L. CARSS, JR., Major, USAF

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY:

WILLIAM B. GRAY, SAC, Knoxville, Tenn

PAGE 104

memo

A memo detailing a visual observation of an unidentified light by NEPA employees on December 18, 1950, near Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

CONFIDENTIAL

This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18 U. S. C., Sections 793 and 794. Its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law.

December 28, 1950

SUBJECT: Visual Observation on December 19, 1950

TO: Mr. William G. Frey
Assistant to the AF Plant
Representative for Security
Office of the AF Plant Representative
Air Material Command
NEPA Division
Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation
Post Office Box E
Oak Ridge, Tennessee

1. On December 18, 1950, at sometime between 0820 and 0830, the following NEPA employees were riding in a vehicle on the Turnpike within the Controlled Area toward the NEPA Project approximately one mile short of the "Y" cutoff to White Wing entrance and Y-12:

Dr. A. J. Miller
Dr. V. P. Calkins
Mr. J. Frank Coneybear
Mr. A O. Mooneyham
Mr. F. T. Bly

2. The passengers, with the exception of Dr. Calkins, who did not attempt to participate in the viewing, observed a light emanating in the shape of a circle, of an intensity much greater than that of a bright moon, through the windshield of the vehicle. The viewers had the impression that there was form in connection with the light rather than merely a point source. The light was white in appearance and did not show any signs of refraction into a band or continuous spectrum. It appeared to be from 15 to 30 degrees elevated above the horizontal and on an azimuth between west and northwest, and appeared to be traveling in a northwesterly direction. The impression of its traveling is due to the fact that the object appeared to diminish considerably in size during the approximate thirty seconds during which it was viewed. The vehicle remained in motion and in following the course of the road, changed its relative position so that the object was viewed during the last few seconds from the side windows. As the vehicle proceeded down the road a near-by ridge obstructed the view of the object, and although the vehicle completed the turn toward K-25 at the "Y" intersection

CONFIDENTIAL

Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation
NEPA Division, P. O. Box 415, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

PAGE 105

memo

This document is a continuation of a report regarding a visual observation of an unidentified object on December 18, 1950, detailing the observers' inability to identify the object and describing its changing appearance.

CONFIDENTIAL
Mr. William G. Frey
Assistant to the AF Plant
Representative for Security
December 28, 1950
Page 2
Subject: Visual Observation on
December 18, 1950

and the passengers had a relatively clear view at points along
the road, the object was not viewed again. The observers were un-
able to estimate approximate size, speed, or vertical elevation;
and, therefore, were not certain whether the object was over the
Controlled Area or a considerable distance away. There was no
vapor trail or any other visible condition within the vicinity of
the object and there were no clouds which could have obscured it.
The observers were unable to identify the object in terms of mass
or shpae, other than the circular appearance of the light. How-
ever, the circular area appeared to darken, starting at approx-
imately 7:00 to 9:00 o'clock along the perimeter and continuing
to darken along the perimeter and inner area until the light was
concentrated in approximately 1:00 to 3:00 o'clock position of a
very small diameter, at which point it appeared somewhat similar
to a large star.

3. The observers were not in complete agreement as to whether the
object was moving at a speed which caused it to diminish in size
or actually was diminishing in size without any great velocity of
travel due to the darkening effect described above.

NEPA Division
FAIRCHILD ENGINE AND AIRPLANE CORPORATION

s/ Gene A. Goedjen
t/ GENE A. GOEDJEN
Plant Protection Manager

GAG:VM

CONFIDENTIAL
Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation
NEPA Division, P. O. Box 415, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY:

WILLIAM B. GRAY, SAC, Knoxville, Tenn.

PAGE 106

report

A report from the 111th CIC Detachment detailing a radar sighting of an unidentified object over the Oak Ridge Controlled Area on December 20, 1950.

20 January 1951

111th CIC Detachment, FAO #8, P.O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE

(In compliance with letter AJACI-360.33 General, dated 15 November 1950. Headquarters, Third Army, Subject; Unconventional Aircraft, the following is submitted.)

A. Location and Time of Sighting: On 1247 hours on 20 December 1950.

B. Weather at Time of Sighting: At 1200 hours on 20 December 1950; Ceiling - 2700 feet; broken overcast; Seven miles visibility; Temperature - 37 degrees F; Dew Point - 31 degrees; and Wind - Calm.

C. Names, Occupations, and Addresses of Witnesses: Personnel of the 663rd AC &C Squadron, and the 5th AN Fighter Squadron, McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee

D. Photographs of Objects, if available: None

E. Object Sighted: The radar log of the 663rd AN and C Squadron, McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee contained the following entry: "20 December 1950. 1247 hours. Small paint in area (Oak Ridge Controlled Area). Very, very slow. Made perfect intercept (with F-82 Fighter aircraft) and orbit surrounding small smoke cloud."

F. Any other pertinent information: This report is made because of its possible aid in determining the identity of the numerous unidentified objects sighted over Oak Ridge, Tennessee

SOURCE: Personnel of 663rd AC &W, Squadron, McGhee Tyson, Knoxville, Tennessee, and the log of the 663rd AC&W Squadron.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-265]
ENCLOSURE

PAGE 107

report

A report from the 111th CIC Detachment regarding unidentified radar targets observed over the Atomic Energy Commission facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on December 14, 1950.

20 January 1951

111th CIC Detachment, FAO #8, P.O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE

(In compliance with latter AJACI-360.33 General, dated 15 November 1950,
Headquarters, third Army, Subject; Unconventional Aircraft, the following is
submitted.)

A. Location and Time of Sighting: From 1605 hours for about three (3) hours,
on 14 December 1951, on the Radar Scopes of the 663rd AC and W Squadron,
McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee.

B. Weather at the Time: At 1600 hours on 14 December 1950--"Ceiling-2100 feet;
Broken overcast; Seven (7) miles visibility; Temperature- 37 degrees F.;
and Wind - Southwest at thirteen (13)miles perhour.

C. Names, Occupations, and Addresses of Witnesses: Personnel of the 663rd
AC and W Squadron, 30th Air Division, McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville,
Tennessee, who were on duty at the time. Their occupations are Radar
operators, Supervisors, and experts.

D. Photographs of Objects, if available: No photographs taken. See "F" below.

E. Object Sighted; A group of targets blanketed the Radar Scopes in the area
directly over the government Atomic Energy Commission projects at Oak
Ridge, Tennessee. These objects could not be identified from the radar
image and a perfect fighter interception met with negative results.

F. Any other pertinent information: Lt. Robinson of the 663rd AC and W
Squadron, McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee took photographs of
the scope readings with a personal, four (4) by five (5) Speed Graphic
Camera, using Plus-X civilian procured film, a lense opening of F-2.5,
and a shutter speed varying from twenty (20) to fourty-five (45) seconds.
The negatives were printed and forwarded to the 30th Air Division, Selfridge
Air Force Base, Michigan, which installation printed the negatives and
sent copies thereof to the 663rd AC and W Squadron. The numerous targets
can readily identified from the permanent radar echos by comparing the
photographs. (B-2)

SOURCE: Personnel and logs of the 663rd AC and W Squadron, McGhee Tyson
Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee.

PAGE 108

report

A report from the 111th CIC Detachment detailing sightings of two bright objects in the sky over Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on January 16, 1951, including observations by radar personnel and an attempted interception by an aircraft.

20 January 1951

111th CIC Detachment, FAO # 8, P.O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE

(in compliance with letter AJACI-360.33 General, dated 15 November 1950,
Headquarters Third Army, Subject; Unconventional Aircraft, the following is
submitted.)

A. Location and Time of Sighting: At 2145 hours on 16 January 1951.

B. Weather at the Time of Sighting: Clear; visibility twenty (20) miles;
Temperature - 37 degrees F.; and Wind - Southwest at five (5) miles perhour.
Winds aloft: At 2000 feet - 240 degrees at 3 knots
3000 " - 210 " " 3 knots
4000 " - 209 " " 5 knots

C. Names, Occupations and Addresses of Witnesses: 663rd AC&W Squadron Personnel
who are Radar operators. AEC Patrol Personnel, policemen at Oak Ridge,
Tennessee. Captains L.C.M. Clevenger and Wm. Aiken, Controllers of 663rd.

D. Photographs of Objects if available: None

E. Object sighted: Two bright objects in the sky, one of which was east of
McGhee Tyson Airport and the other was west. The object to the east was
a light, brighter than any other star, emitting intermittant glows of
various colors in the color spectrum. An aircraft attempted interception
and found that he was heading directly for a star. Weather personnel
explained that the spectral reflection of the star was caused by the
volum of atmosphere and physical matter, together with heat, which must
be looked through to see a star close to the horizon. These phenomenon
caused refraction of the light rays from the star thereby reflecting a
continuous spectral change of light color.

The light to the West was observed through a twenty (20) power spotting
scope and the light seemed to be descending. It took about one hour to
descend behind trees making it disappear from the sight of observers. Captain
Clevenger stated that this light, when viewed through the spotting scope,
took on many peculiar forms, with lines, cores, tails, etc, therein, thus
generally fitting the description of all "flying saucers" ever described
to him.

Shortly after this object disappeared from sight (behind trees) AEC
personnel at Oak Ridge, Tennessee reported they had sighted an object about
twelve (12) miles Southeast of the K-25 Plant in the Controlled Area. They
also observed the aircraft which had been sent for interception but stated
the aircraft was "too far north". The aircraft made no identification, and
AEC personnel later reported that they had observed a star.

PAGE 109

report

This report details a series of sightings of an unusual airborne object over the Oak Ridge area in Tennessee on January 16, 1951, including radar interference and attempted interception by an F-82 aircraft.

20 January 1950

111th CIC Detachment, FAO # 8, P.O. Box 379, Knoxville, Tennessee

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE

F. Any other pertinent information: The Commanding Officer of the 663rd AC&W Squadron, 30th Air Division, McGhee Tyson Airport, Knoxville, Tennessee, in a letter to his Commanding Officer on 17 January 1951, Subject; Report of Unusual incident 2145 hours 16 January 1951, stated:

" 1. In compliance with telephone instructions from the ADCC 17 January 1951, the following unusual incident report is herewith submitted:
Time Date-16 January 1951
1915: An unusual airbourne object was sighted approximately
10 miles WNW of the station, the lighted object was very similar to
a star but much brighter and slightly larger than other visible
stars at the time, as observed the object seemed to be approximately
6,000 feet above the terrain and descending slowly. As the object
appeared to be over or near the Oak Ridge Area, the AEC Patrol
Headquarters was notified and their ground observer alerted.
About this time some interference was noted on the Radar Scopes
(AN/CPS-11 in the approximate area of the observed object; however
no interference was noted on the height finder (AN/CPS-4) (See
attached Form 117 dtd 17 Jan 1951
1925:Object still apparently descending, F-82 scrambled to attempt
interception, still no report from AEC Headquarters.

1930:Similar object observed 15 to 20 miles east of station; seems to be
ascending rather than descending.

1935:AF 7177 (Locally homed and piloted by assigned sq officer) C-45
-enroute CHA to tys, requested fixed to steer to tys - A/C fixed
25 miles SW of station, Pilot Major Raymond C. Care - AF 7177
requested to investigate object east of station.

1945:AF 7177 sighted subject object and reported it to be a star

1945:F-82 orbiting S/E corner of Oak Ridge Area no electronic or visual
observation still no electronic observation by station 47.

1946:Visual observation reported by Oak Ridge Ground Observers, 12 miles
southeast of K-25 area (This is in the SE corner of Oak Ridge Area)
F-82 in sight and is north of object. F-82 vectored south toward
object no contact, electronic or visual. Object report 2400 feet
above terrain by Oak Ridge Observers.

1955:Oak Ridge Patrol Headquarters reports that observed object determined
(to be a star)

PAGE 110

memo

A memo from the 111th CIC Detachment regarding objects sighted over Oak Ridge, Tennessee, including a report from an F-82 aircraft.

20 January 1951

111th CIC Detachment, FAO #8, P.O. 379, Knoxville, Tennessee

OBJECTS SIGHTED OVER OAK RIDGE,
TENNESSEE

to be a star.

2000:F-82 reports clear sailing and no restrictions to visibility,
still patroling area for possible pickup of object, still no joy."

NOTE: This is an extract of the information listed in logs kept at
the Radar Site by Radar Personnel. (B-2)

SOURCE: Personnel as in "C" above.

PAGE 111

memo

An internal FBI memorandum recommending that a Look magazine article from January 1951 regarding flying saucers be filed in the relevant case file.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : MR. C. E. HENNRICH [HANDWRITTEN: signature]
FROM : MR. E. H. MOSSBURG [HANDWRITTEN: signature]
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS
DATE: February 26, 1951

It is recommended the attached article which appeared in Look magazine January, 1951, be filed in captioned case for information purposes.

Attachment
EHM:gmu

[HANDWRITTEN: G. I. R. -7 5-EHM]
162-83894-266
MAR. 6 1951
RECORDED-9 EX-56
65 MAR 14 1951

PAGE 112

cover-page

This is a scan of a manila file folder or envelope cover with a handwritten case number.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-266]

PAGE 113

other

This is a promotional advertisement for the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) television schedule on Saturdays.

Look what we've dished up for you! SATURDAY NOON ON ABC TELEVISION Romance Faith Baldwin's Theatre of Romance—your favorite love stories brought to life by top dramatic stars! Miss Baldwin herself sets the stage on this Saturday TV treat! (Sponsor: Maidenform Bra). Every other SATURDAY at 11 am. Comedy Two Girls Named Smith (one of them pretty Peggy Ann Garner!) are your luncheon guests every Saturday noon on ABC-TV! They're small-town gals in the big city; their adventures are daffy and delightful! (Bab-O and Glim). SATURDAY at 12 noon. Drama I Cover Times Square. Reporter Harold Huber knows every place and every face along the fabulous Great White Way. Every Saturday he takes you along on an exciting, intriguing adventure! (Air-Wick). SATURDAY at 12:30 pm. Acrobat Ranch. Saturday, 10:45 am. (Acrobat Shoes) The Stu Erwin Show. Saturday, 7:30 pm. (General Mills) Paul Whiteman TV Teen Club. Saturday, 8-9 pm. (American Dairy Ass'n) Roller Derby. Saturday, 9 pm. IN NEW YORK, CHICAGO, DETROIT, SAN FRANCISCO AND LOS ANGELES IT'S CHANNEL 7 All times listed are for New York City area only. Elsewhere, consult your local newspaper. American Broadcasting Company 59

PAGE 114

report

This article explains that 'flying saucers' are actually Skyhook balloons used by the Office of Naval Research for high-altitude atmospheric and cosmic ray research, as stated by Dr. Urner Liddel.

A NUCLEAR PHYSICIST EXPOSES FLYING SAUCERS
"There is no longer any need for secrecy," says Navy scientist, after finding that his own research started the "saucers"
By RICHARD WILSON Chief of LOOK Washington Bureau
THE literal-minded FBI, skeptical but determined, could not let the flying-saucer excitement go by without getting to the bottom of it. Such a profusion of strange objects littering the American skies could not be ignored.
A 10-page report by the nuclear physics branch of the Office of Naval Research has given the answer:
Flying saucers were, and are, undeniably real. They are part of a basic research program of the Federal Government which is as important, if not so dramatic, as the visitation from Mars feared by an imaginative public.
A flying saucer is the base of a huge balloon, 100 feet in diameter, called a "Skyhook." It is seen by earthlings traveling at speeds up to 200 miles per hour at heights up to 19 miles.
These balloons are carrying delicate instruments to plumb the secrets of the cosmos in the dizzy reaches of a 100,000-foot height where the atmosphere reaches the vanishing point.
The instruments on the balloons observe and measure the countless explosions of atoms in the atmosphere as they are smashed by cosmic particles hurtling in by the billions from the cold reaches of outer space.
The balloons seek to break the secret of how matter is put together by recording how it is blown apart. And, finally, of how the countless atomic explosions take place silently, smokelessly, flamelessly but energetically at the fringe of the earth's atmosphere may be reproduced under controlled conditions.
This is atomic research aimed not at producing an atomic bomb but at harnessing the energy from the decomposition of the atom. Dr. Urner Liddel, chief of the nuclear physics branch of the Office of Naval Research, is in charge of the Skyhook-Flying Saucer project.
No "Saucers" Without ONR
"When this project first began," he said, "it was kept secret. Now, there is no longer any need for secrecy on a scientific basis. And, certainly, there is no longer any need to keep the public in the dark about what flying saucers are.
"If we are completely successful in our research with these balloons, which so many people have called flying saucers, we will learn out how to break up the atom in a useful way. It is not too much to hope that some day we will learn enough to cause the atomic reaction under conditions as we want them—not as they exist today in the atomic bomb.
"Some day we may learn enough so that we can pour a cup of water into a reactor the size of an average room and draw off from it in cables enough energy to heat a large city."
The Office of Naval Research, where Dr. Liddel is sponsoring the cosmic experiments, is a part of the regular naval establishment with a $40,000,000-a-year program of basic and applied research. The Liddel report is considered to be the most authoritative scientific explanation of the flying-saucer phenomenon. As far as Dr. Liddel is concerned personally, he considers his answer incontrovertibly right.
One of the most convincing factors supporting Dr. Liddel's findings is that flying saucers or flying disks were unheard of until the ONR's experiments in the stratosphere began. There were some flights in 1947, the first year that strange objects were seen in the skies. These reports multiplied in 1948, when Skyhooks were put in the air in large numbers, and continued through 1949. Reports diminished in 1950 when the number of Skyhook balloon flights were reduced.
Ionization Chambers in the Sky
Observers have agreed that the best time of day to see what is called a flying saucer is at dusk of a cool summer evening.
You may be standing on a plain in New Mexico or Montana. You may be flying a plane at 10,000 feet over Alabama. And there in the distance, above you but far from you, is a strange lighted disk. It may be moving or just hovering.
But there it is. You see it with your own eyes. Your companions see it. This thing is round. It appears cup-shaped. It may appear to have a strong glow on one side or to be trailing an exhaust.
What you have seen may be Flight 10, Balloon No. 3 of the Brookhaven National Laboratory at 84,300 feet carrying a 167-pound payload consisting of a cloud chamber, a beacon transmitter, a Geiger telescope, an ionization chamber and photographic equipment.
This object in the sky may appear to you to be from two to ten times the size of Venus, the evening star, which in certain months seems to fill the heavens as it rises. If you are 10,000 feet up in an airplane, the object may appear (Continued on next page)
61

PAGE 115

other

This page contains an article discussing the investigation of flying saucer reports, concluding that they are attributable to cosmic balloons (Skyhook type) rather than extraterrestrial craft, and specifically addresses the death of Captain Thomas F. Mantell.

FLYING SAUCERS continued

No "little men" from afar have
rived in rocket ships

20 per cent larger than from the
ground.

The lateral rays of the sun at
dusk illuminate the base of the
balloon. There is no chance of your
ever seeing the full roundness of
it because you are so far below it.
You see only the illuminated cup
of the bottom. If your imagination
soars, the light reflection on one
side may impress you as the glow
of an atomic engine. The wisp of
the balloon's instrument-filled tail
may impress you as the exhaust.
This extra glow, then, is just the
plastic bag with a fiery glow.

Experienced Observers Fooled
Even seasoned airmen have no
way of estimating the size and the
speed of an object they see. To
peg one and speed, one must must
know the nature of the object. Ex-
perienced seamen have difficulty
estimating the distance, speed and
size of another ship unless they
know its type. The balloon is un-
known and hence eludes efforts to
measure it by familiar craft aloft.
Dr. Liddel and his associates ar-
rived at their findings on these
ballon stories by studying about
2,000 reports of flying-saucer ob-
servations of every kind and de-
scription. They discarded some as
seeming to be the visions of crack-
pots or psychopaths. Other reports
were clearly the result of inaccu-
rate vision.

One report of "little men" found
in the wreckage of a flying saucer
near Mexico City turned out to be
the unsubstantiated story of a
traveler. No one else knew any-
thing about it.

Thus into a solid base of reports
from airplane pilots, scientific ob-
servers and reliable laymen which
could not be brushed aside. After
a thorough investigation, Dr. Lid-
del said: "There is not a single re-
liable report of an observation
which is not attributable to the
cosmic balloons."

The Death of Captain Mantell
The most tragic report the nu-
clear physicists had to consider
was that of an Air Force pilot in
Kentucky. A circular object, me-
tallic in appearance, was seen over
a U. S. Air Force base on Jan. 7,
1948. Three fighter planes, one pi-
loted by Capt. Thomas F. Mantell,
took off in hot pursuit. From their
relatively low altitudes, the bal-
loon seemed to be traveling at the
rate of 360 miles an hour. Two of
the planes turned back at 18,000
feet. Captain Mantell kept going.
He radioed that he would go to
25,000 feet and abandon the search
if he got no closer. None of the
planes was equipped with reserve
oxygen supplies, and thus could
not fly long at high altitudes.

Mantell was not heard from
again. His plane crashed, and the
instruments found in the wreckage
indicated it might have risen to
30,000 feet.
"Our studies show," said Dr.
Liddel, "that Captain Mantell and
the other pilots were pursuing a
balloon of the Skyhook type. Cap-
tain Mantell could never have
reached the height at which the
balloon was traveling."

Several reports have been re-
ceived of "squadrons" of flying
saucers. People have seen little
disks apparently flying together in
the sky. This is explained by Dr.
Liddel as clusters of 20 to 30 bal-
loons, 10 to 15 feet in diameter,
which are sometimes used in place
of the huge Skyhook.

Under certain conditions, they
might be more visible than the sin-
gle plastic bag, and would cer-
tainly be unexplainable by anyone
who didn't know their purpose.

Liddel Got the Facts
After Dr. Liddel had sifted all
the reports which have appeared to have
some foundation, he used his en-
tree as a government nuclear
physicist to check other govern-
ment agencies. He is satisfied that
no other research or experimental
project has utilized anything even
roughly resembling a flying saucer.
"And secondly," he said, "inter-
planetary travel is not possible at
the present time."

This disposed of all the possi-
bilities, according to Dr. Liddel.
His analysis of the flying-saucer
phenomenon as presented here is
the first government disclosure of
what is considered to be the real
cause.

The Skyhook's distinct visual
similarity to a flying-saucer de-
scription was noted strongest at
the Minneapolis project of ONR
under the direction of Colonel
Mills, Inc. Telescopic photographs
brought out the similarity so clear-
ly that Dr. Liddel was elated. He
could at last offer visual proof of
his findings.

Tracing the "Saucers"
General Mills is the only suc-
cessful manufacturer of the huge
and delicate plastic bags. Most of
the total of 270 flights so far made
have been launched at Camp Rip-
ley near Little Falls, Minn., and at
University Airport, Minneapolis,
Minn.

Enough flights have been made
from other points, however, to lit-
ter the country. Balloons have as-
cended from Chicago, from Hollo-
man Air Force Base and White
Sands, N. M., and from aircraft
carriers in both the Caribbean Sea
and the Pacific.

Workers at the General Mills
aeronautical laboratories advised
Dr. Liddel that they were able to
trace lost balloons by published
reports of flying saucers. The big
bags are engineered to stay up
eight hours. Otherwise, they would
be a hazard to air navigation. But
some have actually stayed up more
than 30 hours.

Elaborate arrangements are
made to trace the balloons, for the
data the cosmic physicists want are
(Continued on page 64)

PAGE 116

other

This page contains an advertisement for the Association of American Railroads and an article titled 'FLYING SAUCERS continued' discussing cosmic-ray experiments, the Skyhook project, and future balloon developments.

Today
the average freight train
helps national rearmament
by carrying more freight
and carrying it faster
than ever before in history!
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS
WASHINGTON 6, D. C.
Listen to THE RAILROAD HOUR every Monday evening on NBC
64
Skyhook ready for ascent. "Saucers" were unheard of until ONR's experiments in the stratosphere began under Dr. Liddel's supervision.
FLYING SAUCERS continued
Bigger Skyhooks coming—
then more "saucers" will fly
recorded on the instruments dangling from them. The instruments are released electronically by parachute at the end of the flight.
The cosmic-ray experiments themselves stem from pioneer work done by Dr. Robert A. Millikan 30 years ago when the bombardment of particles from outer space was first discovered. These peculiar phenomena were thought to be some kind of light ray from an unknown source. They were later discovered to be atomic particles striking at the rate of five per square inch per minute at the earth's surface.
Cosmic-Ray Mystery
The source of these particles is unknown. One theory firmly held for a while was that they originated from explosions on the sun. Some scientists believe now that their impact and energy are so great they must originate from higher-powered galaxies outside the solar system.
Whatever their source, these particles strike atoms in the earth's atmosphere, cause them to explode and fill the atmosphere with atomic debris.
Physicists early discovered that the higher they went in the atmosphere the more certain they could be of recording the explosions with the greatest accuracy. Their ultimate aim is to make photographs and measurements at the very fringe of the earth's atmosphere, for all the air below that is filled in greater or lesser degree with atomic debris from the explosions.
These explosions, of course, cannot be seen or felt by the human mechanism. But their dramatic impact on the measuring devices can be photographed with star-tling clarity.
Four levels of cosmic-ray experimentation have been in progress. The first is at sea level where the bombardment is measured and photographed in devices called cloud chambers. This type of experimentation also goes on at two laboratories, Mount Evans and Climax Mountain, both in Colorado, at 14,000 feet.
A third type of experimentation was carried on in three B-29 bombers, fitted out as flying laboratories. They flew up and down a degree of latitude toward the North Pole and away from it between Fort Churchill, Manitoba, and Lima, Peru. These flying laboratories made their recordings at between 30,000 and 40,000 feet.
The fourth type is the Skyhook project which has led to so many reports of flying saucers. But there are still more to come.
General Mills and the Office of Naval Research are working on a new balloon with four times the capacity of the Skyhook, which can rise to heights of 120,000 feet. This will leave only 0.4 per cent of the earth's atmospheric envelope above the new balloon.
It can safely be predicted that a year hence there will be a new wave of flying-saucer reports. The new, improved model will be observed by credulous and alarmed citizens of middle America. These observers will be unable to escape the conclusion that the thing in outer space is gaining on us.
END

PAGE 117

memo

This is a cover sheet for an incoming classified message from NEAC Pepperell AFB to CSAF regarding a flying saucer report, with various administrative stamps and handwritten notes.

CLASSIFIED INCOMING MESSAGE

CONFIDENTIAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

[HANDWRITTEN: FBI]

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED

AF MSG
FEB 13 1951
FROM: NEAC PEPPERELL AFB NFLD
TO: CSAF WASH DC
NR: EW 0212
10 FEB 51

Text on following page.

[HANDWRITTEN: File in Flying Saucer file]
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucer]
[HANDWRITTEN: Eth Mossburg]

ACTION: AF
INFO : G2, G3
RECORDED - 137 162-838945-267
MAR 8 1951
CAF IN 97532
DA IN 131
(12 Feb 51) DTG: 100400Z rls

12 FEB 13 51
373
61 MAR 15 1951

DA SCO FORM 22-3
15 JAN 1949
CONFIDENTIAL
COPY NO. 28
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1949-O-830430

PAGE 118

memo

A classified Air Force message reporting a sighting of an unidentified object by the crew of a Navy aircraft on February 10, 1951.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
STAFF MESSAGE DIVISION
INCOMING CLASSIFIED MESSAGE

CONFIDENTIAL
PRIORITY
PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED. NOTIFY
CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING

FROM: NEAC PEPPERELL AFB NFLD

TO : CSAF WASH D C

NR : EW 0212 10 Feb 51 (DTG 100400)

Unidentified object seen at 0055Z 10 Feb at 49 degrees
50 min north, 50 degrees 03 min west by crew of Navy 6501, VR1,
Petuxent River, MD. Originally seen as heavy light in distance
on the surface as lights of city. The yellowish light, like a
fire in color, approached rapidly and grew very bright and very
large with a semi-circular shape. It was on a true course of
about 125 degrees, plane on a true course of 225 degrees, as it
approached the plane it suddenly turned about almost 180 degrees
and disappeared rapidly over the horizon as a small ball. Speed
"was terrific". Seen fr an angle of about 45 degrees looking down
fr the plane. Crew all experienced North Atlantic fliers Lt F.W.
Kingdon, Lt A.L. Jones, Lt G.E. Bethune, Lt N.G.P. Koger, Lt
J.M. Meyer, all saw object over a period of fr seven to eight min.
Plane flying at 10,000 altitude.

ACTION: OIN
ADDED DIST: ARMY, STATE, CIA, OSD(SDLO), JGS
CAF IN: 97532 (10 Feb 51) MEL/ref

CONFIDENTIAL

COPY No.
THE MAKING OF AN EXACT COPY OF THIS MESSAGE IS FORBIDDEN
AFHQ FORM 0-309 B U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16-56892-2 [HANDWRITTEN: page 2]

PAGE 119

letter

A letter from J. Edgar Hoover to Jimmy W. Short responding to an inquiry about 'flying saucers', stating that the FBI has no material on the subject for distribution.

February 23, 1951

Mr. Jimmy W. Short
910 Caddo Street
Arkadelphia, Arkansas
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED 49 INDEXED 49 62-83894-268]
Dear Jimmy:

Your letter dated February 14, 1951, has been received.

While I appreciate the concern which prompted your writing in this regard, this Bureau does not have available for distribution any material concerning so-called "flying saucers." It was thoughtful of you to bring your observations in this connection to my attention.

I am enclosing some material which I thought you might like to have.

Sincerely yours,

J. Edgar Hoover

John Edgar Hoover
Director

Enclosure
List of courses of study
SA and Clerical Job Sheets
25 Years of Identi
Personnel and Services of Lab

NOTE: The only record located in Bufiles indicated that correspondent requested and received descriptive material concerning the Bureau in 1949. Data presently enclosed is not duplicated.

[HANDWRITTEN: 15. Hd]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECEIVED - DIRECTOR]
[HANDWRITTEN: 373]
[HANDWRITTEN: MAILED 10]
[HANDWRITTEN: FEB 24 1951]
[HANDWRITTEN: MAR 14 1951]

PAGE 120

cover-page

This is a cover page containing FBI date stamps from February 24, 1951, indicating receipt in the mail room and Tolson's office.

F. B. I. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED-MAIL ROOM
FEB 24 4 08 PM '51

REC'D TOLSON'S OFFICE
FEB 24 10 40 AM '51

F. B. I. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

PAGE 121

letter

A letter from Jimmy Stott to J. Edgar Hoover asking about the validity of claims made in Donald Keyhoe's book 'The Flying Saucers Are Real' regarding the FBI and Project Saucer.

[HANDWRITTEN: Jimmy Stott
Arkadelphia, Ark.
910 Caddo St.
Feb. 14, 1951]

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover
Washington, D.C. [HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
Dear Mr. Hoover,
Some time ago I wrote you a letter, and recieved a very nice reply. You said in your letter, if I had a question, to write you.
Well, I have one.
It is about Flying Saucers. I have been reading a book, "The Flying Saucers Are Real" by Donald Keyhoe. He states that the Flying Saucers are from another planet. He says that the F.B.I. and Project Saucer has been working, and trying to solve the flying saucer mystery. He says the Army has discovered some thing important and using the cosmic ray ballom to cover it [HANDWRITTEN: up. (Please turn to page 2)]

[HANDWRITTEN: RBC
mml
ack
2-23-51]

PAGE 122

PAGE 123

letter

A handwritten letter from Jimmy W. Lent to the FBI requesting information about flying saucers and expressing interest in joining the organization.

Page 2

If you could give me some information about the flying saucers, I would appreciate it. I somehow believe that the army is trying to cover something the commissary story just doesnt fit.

I truly admire the F.B.I, and someday hope to become a member of this fine organization. Thank you very much.

Yours Truly,
Jimmy W. Lent

PAGE 124

memo

This FBI teletype memo reports on radar observations of unconventional aircraft near Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, on September 10 and 11, 1951, as provided by Andrew J. Reid of G-2.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

WASH 7 FROM NEWARK 9-20-51
DIRECTOR URGENT
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers] [HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]

UNCONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT OBSERVED SEPTEMBER TEN AND ELEVEN, FIFTY
ONE IN VICINITY FT. MONMOUTH, NJ. INDIC. ON SEPTEMBER TWENTY IN-
STANT, ANDREW J. REID, G-TWO FT. MONMOUTH, NJ, PROVIDED FOLLOWING RE-
PORT OF UNCONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT OBSERVED BY RADAR AT ABOVE AMY
INSTALLATION. QUOTE ON SEPT. TEN, FIFTYONE, AN AN/MPG DASH ONE RADAR
SET PICKED UP A FAST MOVING LOW FLYING TARGET, EXACT ALTITUDE UNDETER-
MINED AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN TEN A.M., SOUTHEAST OF FT. MONMOUTH
AT A RANGE OF ABOUT TWELVE THOUSAND YARDS. THE TARGET APPEARED TO
APPROXIMATELY FOLLOW THE COAST LINE, CHANGING ITS RANGE ONLY SLIGHTLY
BUT CHANGING ITS AZIMUTH RAPIDLY. THE RADAR SET WAS SWITCHED TO FULL
AIDED AZIMUTH TRACKING WHICH NORMALLY IS FAST ENOUGH TO TRACK JET AIR-
CRAFT, BUT IN THIS CASE WAS TOO SLOW TO BE RESORTED TO. TARGET WAS
LOST IN THE N.E. AT A RANGE OF ABOUT FOURTEEN THOUSAND YARDS. THIS
TARGET ALSO PRESENTED AN UNUSUALLY STRONG RETURN FOR AIRCRAFT BEING
COMPARABLE IN STRENGTH TO THAT USUALLY RECEIVED FROM A COASTAL SHIP.
THE OPERATOR INITIALLY IDENTIFIED TARGET AS A SHIP AND THEN REALIZED
THAT IT COULD NOT BE A SHIP AFTER HE OBSERVED ITS EXTREME SPEED.
SEPTEMBER TEN, FIFTYONE, AN SCR FIVE EIGHT FOUR RADAR SET AT THREE
FIFTEEN PM TRACKING A TARGET WHICH MOVED ABOUT SLOWLY IN AZIMUTH NORTH
OF FT. MONMOUTH AT A RANGE OF ABOUT FORTYTWO THOUSAND YARDS AT THE
EXTREMELY UNUSUAL ELEVATION ANGLE OF THIRTEEN HUNDRED FIFTY MILS,
APPROXIMATELY NINETYTHREE THOUSAND ALTITUDE. 3 ON SEPTEMBER ELEVEN,
FIFTYONE, TWO SCR FIVE EIGHT FOUR RADAR SETS AT TEN FIFTY A.M. PICKED
UP THE SAME TARGET NORTHEAST OF FT. MONMOUTH AT AN ELEVATION ANGLE
END OG PAGE ONE

PAGE 125

memo

A memo regarding an unidentified aircraft observed near Monmouth, New Jersey, on September 10, 1951, as reported by the State Police.

FROM: NEWARK
TO: DIRECTOR

UNIDENTIFIED AIRCRAFT OBSERVED IN VICINITY OF MONMOUTH, N.J. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1951. STATE POLICE, RED BANK, N.J. OBSERVED A RADAR ABOVE THE INSTALLATION. QUOTE ON SEPT. 10, 1951, THE TARGET WAS MOVING FAST EXCLUDING MILITARY AIRCRAFT. MINED APPROXIMATELY 4 MI. SOUTH OF THE INSTALLATION. AT A RANGE OF ABOUT TWELVE THOUSAND YARDS. THE TARGET WAS APPROXIMATELY 4 MI. OFF THE COAST LINE CHANGING ITS COURSE BUT CHANGING ITS ALTITUDE. THE TARGET IS NORMALLY WHICH IS TRACKING TO THE COAST. THE TARGET WAS TOO SLOW TO BE RESOLVED TO AIRCRAFT. LOST IN THE N.E. AT A RANGE OF ABOUT FOURTEEN THOUSAND YARDS. TARGET ALSO PRESENTED AN UNUSUALLY STRONG RETURN FOR AIRCRAFT BEING COMPARABLE IN STRENGTH TO THAT USUALLY RECEIVED FROM A COASTAL SHIP. THE OPERATOR INITIALLY IDENTIFIED TARGET AS A SHIP AND THEN REVISED. THAT IT COULD NOT BE A SHIP AFTER HE OBSERVED IT. DEPT OF JUSTICE.

RECEIVED-LAB
F B I
SEP 21 11 36 AM '51

REC'D BELMONT
F B I
OCT 8 11 34 AM '51

SEP 21 12 52 PM '51
RECEIVED-TOLSON
F B I

SEP 21 10 21 AM '51
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I

OCT 15 1 44 PM '51
RECEIVED-NICHOLS
F B I

OCT 8 3 27 PM '51
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I

PAGE 126

report

This report describes radar tracking of an unidentified target on September 11, 1951, near Navesink, NJ, noting its high speed, unusual maneuverability, and hovering behavior.

PAGE TWO

OF THREE HUNDRED FIFTY TO THREE HUNDRED MILS AT A RANGE OF APPROXIMATELY THIRTY THOUSAND YARDS, APPROXIMATE ALTITUDE THIRTYONE THOUSAND FEET. THE SET TRACK AUTOMATICALLY IS AZIMUTH AND ELEVATION AND WAS AIDED RANGE TRACKING AND CAPABLE OF TRACKING TARGETS UP TO A SPEED OF SEVEN HUNDRED MPH. IN THIS CASE, HOWEVER, BOTH SETS FOUND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK THE TARGET IN RANGE DUE TO ITS SPEED AND THE OPERATORS HAD TO RESORT TO MANUAL RANGE TRACKING IN ORDER TO HOLD THE TARGET. THE TARGET WAS TRACKED IN THIS MANNER TO THE MAXIMUM TRACKING RANGE OF THIRTYTWO THOUSAND YARDS. THE OPERATOR SAID THE TARGET TO BE MOVING AT A SPEED SEVERAL HUNDRED MPH HIGHER THAN THE MAXIMUM AIDED TRACKING ABILITY OF THE RADAR SETS. THIS TARGET PROVIDED AN EXTREMELY STRONG RETURN ECHO AT TIMES EVEN THOUGH IT WAS THE MAXIMUM RANGE, HOWEVER, ECHO SIGNAL OCCASIONALLY FELL OFF TO A LEVEL BELOW NORMAL RETURN. THESE CHANGES COINCIDED WITH MANEUVERS OF THE TARGET. ON SEPTEMBER ELEVEN, FIFTYONE AT ABOUT ONE THIRTY P.M. THE TARGET WAS PICKED UP ON AN SCR FIVE EIGHT FOUR RADAR SET THAT DISPLAYED UNUSUAL MANEUVERABILITY. TARGET WAS APPROXIMATELY OVER NAVESINK, NJ., AS INDICATED BY HIS TEN THOUSAND RANGE, SIX THOUSAND FEET ALTITUDE AND DUE NORTH AZIMUTH. THE TARGET REMAINED PRACTICALLY STATIONARY ON THE SCHOPE AND APPEARED TO BE HOVERING. THE OPERATOR LOOKED OUT OF THE VAN PAREND THE VEHICLE HOUSING THE RADAR SETA PAREND IN AN ATTEMPT TO SEE THE TARGET, SINCE IT WAS AT SUCH A SHORT RANGE, HOWEVER, OVERCAST CONDITIONS PREVENTED SUCH OBSERVATION. RETURNING TO THEIR OPERATING POSITION THE TARGET WAS OBSERVED TO BE CHANGING IN ELEVATION AT AN EXTREMELY RAPID RATE, BUT CHANGE IN RANGE WAS SO SLOW THE OPEREND OF PAGE TWO

PAGE 127

report

This document is a report detailing radar tracking observations of an unidentified target, noting its rapid speed and vertical rise, and mentioning that the information was coordinated with G-Two at Governors Island.

PAGE THREE

ATOR BELIEVED THE TARGET MUST HAVE RISEN NEARLY VERTICALLY. TARGET FIXED ITS RISE IN ELEVATION AT AN ELEVATION ANGLE OF APPROX. FIFTEEN HUNDRED MILS, AT WHICH TIME IT PROCEEDED TO MOVE AT AN EXTREMELY RAPID RATE IN RANGE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION. ONCE AGAIN THE SPEED OF THE TARGET EXCEEDED THE AIDED TRACKING ABILITY OF THE SCR FIVE EIGHT FOUR SET SO THAT MANUAL TRACKING BECAME NECESSARY. RADAR TRACKED THE TARGET MAXIMUM RANGE OF THIRTYTWO THOUSAND YARDS AT WHICH TIME TARGET WAS AT AN ELEVATION ANGLE THREE HUNDRED MILS. THE OPERATOR DID NOT ATTEMPT TO JUDGE THE SPEED IN EXCESS OF THE AIDED TRACKING RATE OF SEVEN HUNDRED MPH. THE WEATHER WAS FAIR WHEN THE OBSERVATION WAS MADE SEPTEMBER TENTH AND CLOUDY FOR THE SEPTEMBER ELEVENTH REPORT. UNQUOTE.

ABOVE INCIDENT OBSERVED BY THREE WITNESSES WITH EXCEPTION OF FIRST INCIDENT ON SEPTEMBER TEN. ABOVE INFO FURNISHED BY REID AFTER APPROVAL OF G-TWO, GOVERNORS ISLAND, NY, WITH REQUEST THAT INFO BE COORDINATED WITH AIR FORCE. REID ALSO ADVISED IN CONFIDENCE THAT ABOVE REPORT RECEIVED BY HIM AFTER CONSIDERABLE UNACCOUNTABLE DELAY.

MC KEE

[HANDWRITTEN: CC MR BELMONT]

END AAD PLS

NK R 7 WA AS

DISC

PAGE 128

report

A report detailing the observation of an unidentified aerial target, noting its high speed, vertical movement, and the difficulty in tracking it with video equipment.

TARGET. THE TARGET MUST HAVE BEEN NEARLY VERTICAL. FIXED ITS RISE IN ELEVATION AT AN ANGLE OF APPROX. 45 DEGREES. MILES, WHICH TIME IT PROCEEDED TO MOVE AT EXTREMELY RAPID RATE AND IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION. ONCE AGAIN THE SPEED OF THE TARGET EXCEEDED THE ABILITY OF THE VIDEO CAMERA TO TRACK. MANUAL TRACKING BECAME NECESSARY. RADAR CONTACT WAS LOST. THE TARGET AT WHICH THOUSANDS OF FEET AT WHICH TIME TARGET WAS MOVING AT AN ANGLE. THE OBSERVER DID NOT ATTEMPT TO JUDGE THE SPEED IN EXCESS OF THE VIDEO TRACKING RATE. THE WEATHER WAS FAIR WHEN THE OBSERVATION WAS MADE. HUNDRED MPH. THE WEATHER FOR THE SEPTEMBER 10 REPORT. UNKNOWN. ABOVE INCIDENT OBSERVED BY THREE WITNESSES WITH EXCELLENT OF FIRST INCIDENT ON SEPTEMBER 10. ABOVE INFO FURNISHED BY SAID VELLEK. APPROVAL OF C-2. INLAND, VA. ALSO ADVISED THE CORRESPONDING WITH AIR FORCE. REPORT RECEIVED BY HIM AFTER CONSIDERABLE DELAY. MC KEE. END AND THE IN VA DIS

PAGE 129

memo

This FBI memorandum details a report from informant Karl Nyquist regarding his sighting of a flying disc in Chicago on March 6, 1952.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : DIRECTOR, FBI (62-83894) DATE: March 21, 1952
FROM : SAC, CHICAGO (100-18999)
SUBJECT: FLYING DISCS
KARL NYQUIST, INFORMANT
[HANDWRITTEN: HTO / B/]
Mr. KARL NYQUIST, an artist living at 2417 North Burling Street, Chicago, Illinois (telephone LI-9-1479) advised SA MYRON H. TRETER on March 11, 1952 that he saw a flying disc at 9:00 AM on March 6, 1952.
NYQUIST stated that he was looking out of a window at his home which window faces south, when he saw a flying disc at approximately 7,000 feet above Fullerton Avenue. The angle of elevation of the disc above the horizon was about 45 degrees. The disc came out of a cloud in the east, stopped and hung motionless in mid-air for a split second, then flew due south at great speed.
He described the disc as approximately six feet in diameter, circular, white in color with a bluish tinge. The disc, he said, appeared to have been constructed out of a metal similar to aluminum. He also stated that he saw no exhaust, lights, or heard no sound connected with its movements. He noted nothing on it as to how it could maintain its even flight and believed it to have been radio controlled. He said it disappeared out of sight in approximately three seconds, estimating the speed at 600-700 miles per hour or more. He said it went so fast it appeared to flutter. When the disc disappeared from sight it was about the size of a golf ball on the southern horizon.
NYQUIST made a sketch of the disc and the sketch and the above information were furnished to the local office of the Office of Special Investigations.

MHT:BJB
[HANDWRITTEN: CK]
RECORDED - 79
INDEXED - 79
EX-125
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-290]
MAR 25 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: 6]
[HANDWRITTEN: E.H. Mossburg]
[HANDWRITTEN: FIVE]
[HANDWRITTEN: 57 APR 1 1952]

PAGE 130

report

This report details three separate radar tracking incidents involving unidentified fast-moving targets near Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, between September 10 and September 11, 1951.

[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers Heuristic] [HANDWRITTEN: Rec'd confidentially from [ILLEGIBLE] 10/15/51] [HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

On 10 September 1951 as AN/MPG-1 radar set picked up a fast moving low flying target (exact alt undetermined) at approximately 1110 hours SE of Fort Monmouth at a range of about 12,000 yards. The target appeared to approximately follow the coast line changing its range only slightly but changing its azimuth rapidly. The radar set was switched to full aided azimuth tracking which normally is fast enough to track jet acft, but in this case was too slow to be resorted to. The target was lost in the NE at a range of about 14,000 yards. This target also presented an unusually strong return for an acft being comparable in strength to that usually received from a coastal ship. The operator initially identified the target as a ship and then realized that it could not be a ship after he observed its extreme speed.

On 10 September 1951, 1515 hours, an SCR 584, serial no. 433 tracked a target which moved about slowly in azimuth N of Fort Monmouth at a range of about 32,000 yds at the extremely unusual elevation angle of 1350 mils. (Altitude approximately 93,000 ft)

On 11 September 1951, 1050 hours, 2 SCR 584 serial nos. 217 and 315 picked up the same target NE of Fort Monmouth at an elevation angle of 350 to 300 mils at a range of approximately 30,000 yards. (Approximate altitude 31,000 ft) the sets track automatically in azimuth and elevation and with aided range tracking are capable of tracking targets up to a speed of 700 mph. In this case however, both sets found it impossible to track the target in range due to its speed and the operators had to resort to manual tracking in order to hold the target. The target was tracked in this manner to the maximum tracking range of 32,000 yards. The operators judged the target to be moving at a speed several hundred miles per hour higher than the maximum aided tracking ability of the radar sets. This target provided an extremely strong echo at times even though it was at maximum range, however the echo signal occasionally fell off to a level below normal return. These changes coincided with maneuvers of the target. [HANDWRITTEN: 63-83894] [HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]

On 11 September 1951 at about 130 a target was picked up on an SCR 584 radar set serial no. 315 that displayed unusual maneuverability. The target was approx. over Navesink NJ as indicated by its 10,000 yard range, 600 ft altitude and due N azimuth. The target remained practically stationary on the scope and appeared to be hovering. The operators looked out of the van in an attempt to see the target since it was at such a short range, however overcase conditions prevented such observation. Returning to their positions the target was observed to be changing its elevation at an extremely rapid rate, the change in range was so small the operators believed the target must have risen nearly vertically. The target ceased its rise in elevation at an elevation angle of approx 1500 mils at which time it proceeded to move at an extremely rapid rate in range in a southerly direction once again the speed on the target exceeding the aided tracking ability of the SCR 584 so that manual tracking became necessary. The radar tracked the target to the maximum of 32,000 yards at which time the target was at an elevation angle of 300 mils. The operators did not attempt to judge the speed in excess of the aided tracking rate of 700 mph. [HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] 19 1951] [HANDWRITTEN: 5-8th [ILLEGIBLE]]

PAGE 131

memo

An FBI memorandum detailing a report from Lt. Commander Melvin Michael Kuhn regarding his observation of an unidentified flying object in Nashville, Tennessee, on March 13, 1952.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Director, FBI DATE: 4-3-52
FROM: SAC, Memphis (62-0)
SUBJECT: UNKNOWN SUBJECT; Flying Objects, 
Nashville, Tennessee
INFORMATION CONCERNING
[HANDWRITTEN: OF FLYING DISCS]
Lt. Commander MELVIN MICHAEL KUHN, U. S. Navy, temporarily residing at 1900 Graybar Lane, Nashville, Tennessee, advised SAA CHARLES J. HONETOR of the Nashville Resident Agency on March 14, 1952, at approximately 2:15 p.m. of the following incident.
Mr. KUHN stated that approximately 10:20 p.m. on March 13, 1952, while standing in the back yard of 1900 Graybar Lane and looking toward the moon, which was then in the southwest section of the sky, he observed an object which appeared approximately 20 degrees above the horizon. Lt. KUHN described this object as being circular in shape, approximately one-half the size of the moon, deep bright blue in color, very vivid blue. He stated the object had a slight reddish fringe on the aft end. The object appeared to be moving from the northwest to the southeast. He stated that the object was not in his vision more than three seconds. It made no sound. Lt. KUHN stated that at the time he observed this, there were no clouds in the sky, the stars were out, and the moon was full. Lt. KUHN stated that the only way he could describe it was that it appeared to be a very high powered spotlight on a cloud, but he did not believe this could have been the cause of that which he had seen because he had not seen any spotlight or any strong search lights there during the evening.
The above is being furnished for your information, and no action is contemplated by this office unless advised to the contrary.
CJH:AJ
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 46 102-83894-271]
[HANDWRITTEN: APR 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: 64 APR 23 1952]

PAGE 132

memo

A memorandum from the San Antonio FBI office regarding a report by J. Milton Munn of a circular, blue, unidentified flying object seen in Nashville on March 13, 1952.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO: Director, FBI DATE: 3-25-52
FROM: SAC, San Antonio (62-0)
SUBJECT: UNKNOWN FLYING OBJECTS
Nashville, Tennessee
INFORMATION CONCERNING

1. J. MILTON MUNN, U.S. Navy, temporarily residing at 1000 Chester Ave, Nashville, Tennessee, advised the Nashville Resident Agency on March 11, 1952, at approximately 8:15 p.m. of the following incident.

Mr. MUNN stated that approximately 10:40 p.m. on March 13, 1952, while standing in the back yard of 1000 Chester Ave, looking toward the moon, which was then in the southeast, he observed the following.

An object which appeared approximately 20 degrees above the horizon. J. MUNN described this object as being circular in shape, approximately one-half the size of the bright moon, blue in color. He stated the object had a slight reddish tinge on the rim and. He stated the object appeared to be moving from the northwest to the southeast. He stated that the object was not in his vision more than three seconds. J. MUNN stated that at the time he observed this, it made no sound. There were clouds in the sky and the stars were out, and the moon was [ILLEGIBLE]. J. MUNN stated that the only way he could describe it was that it appeared to be very high, bright, spotlight on a cloud, but he did not believe this could have been the cause of that which he had seen because he had seen no search lights or spotlights of any description during the evening.

The above is being furnished for your information and no action is contemplated by this office unless advised to the contrary.

LA:HCO

RECEIVED
FBI
U S DEPT OF JUSTIC
APR 7 3 52 PM '52
MR. JONES

PAGE 133

memo

An FBI office memorandum noting that an article titled 'Have We Visitors From Space?' in the April 7, 1952, issue of Life magazine has been placed in the Bureau Library for reference.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO [HANDWRITTEN: W.A.B.] A. Branigan
FROM : E. H. Mossburg
SUBJECT: FLYING DISCS

DATE: April 17, 1952

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Clegg, Glavin, Nichols, Rosen, Tracy, Harbo, Belmont, Mohr, Tele. Room, Nease, Gandy]

For record purposes, it is desired to point out that the April 7, 1952, issue of "Life" magazine contains an article on page 80 entitled, "Have We Visitors From Space?" written by H. B. Darrach, Jr., and Robert Ginna relating to the captioned matter. For further reference purposes, a copy of this issue of "Life" magazine is maintained in the Bureau Library.

EHM:rd [HANDWRITTEN: Rd]

[HANDWRITTEN: 57 APR 28 1952]
RECORDED - 9 162-83894-279
APR 22 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: 893]
[HANDWRITTEN: 5-EHM]
[HANDWRITTEN: CHM]

PAGE 134

memo

A memo from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to the Air Force regarding an interview with Fred J. Eekhout, who shared his theories on the operation of flying saucers.

Date: May 7, 1952
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.
From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Subject: FRED J. EEKHOUT

[HANDWRITTEN: Awt] On May 5, 1952, Fred J. Eekhout called at this Bureau and advised that he is General Manager of Mouton and Company, Printers, 5 Herderstraat, The Hague, Netherlands. He resides at 49 Stadhouderslaan, The Hague. He is residing at the Victoria Hotel, New York City, until May 16, 1952, when he will return to Europe.

Mr. Eekhout advised that he has a considerable interest in electronics and has been very much interested in reports circulated during the past year or two concerning the existence of flying saucers. He feels that there have been enough uncontradicted reports concerning such devices to indicate that they may exist in fact. He is also of the opinion that if they do exist they can be produced only by the United States or Russia or perhaps by the Republic of Argentina.

Mr. Eekhout indicated that he has given extensive thought to the manner in which these devices could be operated. He has concluded that since the disk shape is not suitable for conventional aircraft it would be used only because it would provide the greatest possible lifting surface. It is his opinion, therefore, that one of these devices could be operated only by reducing the air pressure above it which would cause it to rise in the air. He concedes that conventional machinery to cause such a reduction of pressure would be so bulky that its weight would prevent the device from leaving the ground. He concludes, therefore,

VHB:rdm [HANDWRITTEN: 65] [HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-273] [HANDWRITTEN: VHB]

PAGE 135

memo

This document details a theory provided by an individual named Eekhout regarding the propulsion of a disk-shaped craft using ion emission and Faraday's Cage principles, along with a note regarding his interview by FBI personnel.

that power to accomplish this end would have to be derived from the cracking of an atomic fuel such as heavy water.

In that connection he states that the ionosphere surrounding the earth radiates positive ions toward the earth's surface. Many of these are dissipated by combining with particles in the atmosphere with the result that positive ions are more concentrated near the earth's surface than higher above it. He reasons that a disk could be raised in the air by emitting a great quantity of negative ions through its upper surface and causing a decrease in pressure which would result in the pressure underneath the disk forcing it upward. He indicates that somewhere between the surface of the earth and the ionosphere this pressure would equalize at which point the disk could go no higher. It could then be moved horizontally by emitting negative ions in the direction in which it is desired to move.

Mr. Eekhout stated that he did not feel such a device could be remote controlled since it would probably not be possible to maintain radio contact with it. He feels, however, that the occupants of such a device would be fully protected since according to the electrical theory demonstrated by Faraday's Cage the current involved in the propulsion of such a device would concentrate itself around the edges of the disk.

The foregoing is furnished for your information.

(NOTE ON YELLOW: Eekhout was interviewed at 2:15 p.m. 5-5-52, by Supervisor V. H. Bailey by reference from Mr. Nichols' Office. Bureau files contain no data identifiable with him.)

- 2 -

PAGE 136

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mr. W. B. Burgess acknowledging receipt of his letter and informing him that the matter has been referred to the Department of Defense.

INDEXED - 46
RECORDED - 46
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-274]
May 13, 1952

Mr. W. B. Burgess
Box 147
Black Mountain, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Burgess:

Your letter dated May 7, 1952, has been received and I appreciate the interest prompting you to bring your observations to my attention.

Since the matter you mention may be of interest to another governmental agency, I am referring a copy of your letter to The Honorable, The Secretary of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, D. C., and you may wish to write him directly in this connection.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

copy of incoming sent to Dep't. of Defense by form

DIC:grN

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Nichols, Belmont, Clegg, Glavin, Harbo, Rosen, Tracy, Laughlin, Mohr, Tele. Rm., Holloman, Gandy]
[HANDWRITTEN: 60 MAY 23 1952]
MAILED 10
MAY 14 1952

PAGE 137

letter

A letter from a citizen in Black Mountain, N.C., to J. Edgar Hoover suggesting that 'Flying Saucers' may be operated by the absorption and emission of solar energy and warning of the consequences if Russia acquires this technology first.

Box 147
Black Mountain, N.C.
May 7, 1952

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover
c/o U. S. Dept. of Justice
Washington, D. C.

Dear Mr. Hoover:

The motive of this letter is a sincere effort to help avoid
useless waste of life, time and money. It is written with full
respect to your pressing work, and to the ability of this
country's scientific experts.

Although your responsibilities may not be directly connected
with the intended text of this letter, I sincerely hope that
you will consider the possibilities, and forward the suggestions
to the proper authorities concerned.

For the past five years the general public has read, and bally-
hoed newspaper articles related to the "Flying Saucers", and
following the same trend of thought have ignored recent re-
ports made by persons of undisputed experience and intelligence.

The possibilities of this earth being visited by ships from
outer space have been lightly suggested by some, while others
believe the "objects" belong to some nation on this earth.
Granted that some such objects do even belong to this country,
it is obvious that we, nor any other nation possess and fail
to use, in time of war, such useful means as have been re-
ported by the balloon experts connected with General Mills, Inc.

I am sure that these suggestions will bear scientific inves-
tigation and that they are entirely probable. Similar to
Columbus and the egg - they may not have been given due con-
sideration.

These "objects" of undetermined origin (not to be confused
with our controlled weather balloons, etc.) are in all prob-
ability operated by the absorption, compression, and con-
trolled emission of the sun's energy (basically electricity).
As such, they probably carry a potential charge which is past
our imagination. An earthly object approaching too close to
the O.U.O. would have the same effect as grounding a high-
tension wire, with the total destruction of both objects as
a likely result.

Assuming that some of these objects are from outer space, we
would certainly benefit considerably by establishing contact
with them, where as, if such a nation as Russia should ac-
quire this knowledge before us we would certainly suffer as
a result

[HANDWRITTEN: aml ack 5 13.52 Die] [HANDWRITTEN: R] RECORDED - 46 162-83894-274 MAY 20 1952 [HANDWRITTEN: EX-47] [HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE]]

PAGE 138

letter

A letter addressed to the FBI regarding the investigation of 'flying saucers' and suggesting they may be related to balloon operations.

The motive of this letter is a sincere effort to help avoid useless waste of time and money. I feel that I owe respect to your pressing duties and to the ability of the country's scientific experts.

Although your responsibilities may not be directly connected with the intended task of this letter, I sincerely hope that you will consider the considerations and forward my suggestions to the proper authorities concerned.

For the past five years, the general public has seen and had been newspaper articles related to "flying saucers" and following the same trend, I thought I have ignored these reports made by persons of undoubted experience and intelligence.

The possibility of this earth being visited by ships from other space have been suggested by some who believe the "objects" belong to this country. It is obvious that information has not been released to us of such useful means as have been reported by the Foo Fighters connected with General [REDACTED] know.

I am sure that these suggestions will best solve the inves- tigation and that they are general probable. Similar to con- clusions that may not have been given the due consideration.

These "objects" (not to be defined) are [REDACTED] with the [REDACTED] balloon stations. The possibility of the operation by the [REDACTED] (basically [REDACTED]) balloon extension. As such that probably a material change in which [REDACTED] to the [REDACTED] approaching the [REDACTED] the U.S. would want to [REDACTED] U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE FBI RECEIVED

[HANDWRITTEN: MR. JONES May 9 4 54 PM '52]

[HANDWRITTEN: May 9 3 52 PM '52]

[HANDWRITTEN: MAY 30 1952]

PAGE 139

letter

A letter from W. B. Burges speculating on the nature, capabilities, and origins of unidentified flying objects, while expressing a desire to conduct research on the subject.

-2-

Whatever means of power these objects possess, thay may attain speeds far in excess of our latest rockets. It will be futile to give pursuit, or to attempt any forceful approach.

From reports, we have no reason to believe these objects have anything but friendly intentions, also, they may be restricted as to the distance they may approach the earth without danger. It is also my belief that given an opportunity, they will approach an earthly object, at high altitude, as close as possible without danger to either themselves or the object.

If my theory approaches the truth, then these strange objects will be unable to establish contact wth the earth without our assistance.

Taking the earth at an age of two billion years, having suffered worldly catastrophies, and set-backs, we may be as children compared to a planet of four billion years, or of equal age without catastrophies.

Our scientific laws have worked well for us, however, they probably do not hold true for all planets. Lacking water and trees in the beginning we would have been an entirely different world, perhaps even further advanced.

My background includes a good foundation in high-altitude flying, and in the field of electricity. Although I am well established in business, it is my desire toenter the field of research related to this subject.

My name is not for publication.

Very truly yours,
W. B. Burges

PAGE 140

memo

A teletype report from FBI Savannah to the FBI Director regarding sightings of flying discs by four DuPont employees at the Savannah River Plant on May 10, 1952.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
MAY 12 1952
TELETYPE
[HANDWRITTEN: Mr. Tolson, Mr. Ladd, Mr. [ILLEGIBLE], Mr. [ILLEGIBLE], Mr. Clegg, Mr. Glavin, Mr. Harbo, Mr. Rosen, Mr. Tracy, Mr. Laughlin, Mr. Mohr, Tele. Room, Mr. Holloman, Miss Gandy]

FBI, SAVANNAH
5-12-52
7-58 PM
DIRECTOR, FBI
URGENT
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: Awk]

SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT, ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, FLYING DISC. AT APPROXIMATELY TEN FORTYFIVE PM, MAY TEN LAST FOUR EMPLOYEES OF DUPONT CO., EMPLOYED ON SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT NEAR ELLENTION, S. C., SAW FOUR DISC SHAPED OBJECTS APPROACHING THE FOUR HUNDRED AREA FROM THE SOUTH, DISAPPEARING IN NORTHERNLY DIRECTION. AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN FIVE PM, ABOVE MENTIONED EMPLOYEES SAW TWO SIMILAR OBJECTS APPROACH FROM SOUTH AND DISAPPEAR IN NORTHERNLY DIRECTION. AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN TEN PM ONE SIMILAR OBJECT APPROACHED FROM THE NORTHEAST AND DISAPPEARED IN SOUTHWESTERNLY DIRECTION. ONE MORE OBJECT SIGHTED ABOUT ELEVEN FIFTEEN PM TRAVELLING FROM SOUTH TO NORTH. EMPLOYEES DESCRIBED OBJECTS AS BEING ABOUT FIFTEEN INCHES IN DIAMETER, HAVING YELLOW TO GOLD COLOR. ALL OF THESE OBJECTS WERE TRAVELLING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AT HIGH ALTITUDE WITHOUT ANY NOISE. EIGHTH OBJECT WHICH APPROACHED THE FOUR HUNDRED AREA FROM NE WAS TRAVELLING AT ALTITUDE SO LOW IT HAD TO RISE TO PASS OVER SOME TALL TANKS IN FOUR HUNDRED AREA. THIS OBJECT WAS ALSO FLYING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AND WAS NOISELESS. WITNESSES STATED OBSERVED OBJECTS WEAVING FROM LEFT TO RIGH
[HANDWRITTEN: Note see copy of tel fraction by Liaison. 69 MAY 20 1952]
RECORDED 62-83894-225
17
[HANDWRITTEN: 5-E [ILLEGIBLE] Branigan]
END PAGE ONE

PAGE 141

form

This page consists entirely of various FBI date-received stamps and routing stamps from May 1952.

REC'D BELMONT
F.B.I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 4 48 PM '52

MAY 14 9 01 AM '52
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

MAY 28 10 42 AM '52
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED - DIRECTOR
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 10 27 AM '52

RECEIVED - TOLSON
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 10 21 AM '52

RECEIVED - LAD
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 28 12 14 PM '52

RECEIVED - N
F B I
S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 10 27 AM '52

PAGE 142

memo

This is the second page of a memo regarding an observation of an object, noting that the Savannah FBI office is not actively investigating and is referring the information to the Bureau.

PAGE TWO

BUT SEEMED TO HOLD GENERAL COURSE. ALSO STATED DUE TO SPEED AND ALTITUDE THEY WERE ONLY VISIBLE FOR FEW SECONDS. SAVANNAH OFFICE IS NOT ACTIVELY CONDUCTING INVESTIGATION IN THIS MATTER AND IS FURNISHING THIS INFO TO BUREAU FOR WHATEVER ACTION THEY DEEM ADVISABLE.

SCHLENKER
ACK AND HOLD
9-03 PM OK FBI WA SS

PAGE 143

memo

A brief internal FBI communication memo dated May 12, 1952, regarding an investigation and the furnishing of information for further action.

RECEIVED
F B I
COMMUNICATIONS
MAY 12 9 05 PM '52

BUT SEEMED TO HOLD CERTAIN DOUBTS. ALSO STATED TO THE AGENT THAT
ATTITUDE THEY ONLY VISITED FOR A SECOND. SAID THEY HAD NO OFFICE IN
NOT ACTIVELY CONDUCTING INVESTIGATION IN THIS MATTER AND IS FURNISHING
THIS INFO TO PURSUE FOR ACTION THEY DEEM ADVISABLE.

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
JUSTICE
May 12 10 12 PM '52

PAGE 144

memo

An FBI teletype report from the Savannah office regarding sightings of flying discs by four DuPont employees at the Savannah River Plant on May 10, 1952.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
MAY 12 1952
TELETYPE
[HANDWRITTEN: x707]
FBI, SAVANNAH 5-12-52 7-58 PM
DIRECTOR, FBI URGENT
SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT, ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, FLYING DISC. AT APPROXIMATELY TEN FORTYFIVE PM, MAY TEN LAST FOUR EMPLOYEES OF DUPONT CO., EMPLOYED ON SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT NEAR ELLENTION, S. C., SAW FOUR DISC SHAPED OBJECTS APPROACHING THE FOUR HUNDRED AREA FROM THE SOUTH, DISAPPEARING IN NORTHERNLY DIRECTION. AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN FIVE PM, ABOVE MENTIONED EMPLOYEES SAW TWO SIMILAR OBJECTS APPROACH FROM SOUTH AND DISAPPEAR IN NORTHERNLY DIRECTION. AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN TEN PM ONE SIMILAR OBJECT APPROACHED FROM THE NORTHEAST AND DISAPPEARED IN SOUTHWESTERNLY DIRECTION. ONE MORE OBJECT SIGHTED ABOUT ELEVEN FIFTEEN PM TRAVELLING FROM SOUTH TO NORTH. EMPLOYEES DESCRIBED OBJECTS AS BEING ABOUT FIFTEEN INCHES IN DIAMETER, HAVING YELLOW TO GOLD COLOR. ALL OF THESE OBJECTS WERE TRAVELLING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AT HIGH ALTITUDE WITHOUT ANY NOISE. EIGHTH OBJECT WHICH APPROACHED THE FOUR HUNDRED AREA FROM NE WAS TRAVELLING AT ALTITUDE SO LOW IT HAD TO RISE TO PASS OVER SOME TALL TANKS IN FOUR HUNDRED AREA. THIS OBJECT WAS ALSO FLYING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AND WAS NOISELESS. WITNESSES STATED OBSERVED OBJECTS WEAVING FROM LEFT TO RIGH [ILLEGIBLE]
[HANDWRITTEN: files 5th]
END PAGE ONE

PAGE 145

cover-page

This page is a cover sheet containing multiple FBI and Department of Justice date stamps from May 1952.

RECEIVED
MAY 13 10 20 AM '52
INTERNAL SECURITY
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

CORP ATION-LIAISON
F. B. I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 3 54 PM '52

REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 12 11 PM '52

MAY 22 11 35 AM '52
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

PAGE 146

memo

This document is a continuation page of a report regarding an investigation into an aerial sighting, noting that the Savannah office is not actively investigating and that AEC and OSI have been advised.

PAGE TWO

BUT SEEMED TO HOLD GENERAL COURSE. ALSO STATED DUE TO SPEED AND ALTITUDE THEY WERE ONLY VISIBLE FOR FEW SECONDS. SAVANNAH OFFICE IS NOT ACTIVELY CONDUCTING INVESTIGATION IN THIS MATTER AND IS FURNISHING THIS INFO TO BUREAU FOR WHATEVER ACTION THEY DEEM ADVISABLE.

[HANDWRITTEN: 5-14-52
G2 advised
JAS
5/14/52 John White, AEC advised him
5/14/52 Col Free OSI advised]

SCHLENKER
ACK AND HOLD
9-03 PM OK FBI WA SS

[HANDWRITTEN: N.W. Philcox also advised
AEC + OSI stated they are conducting
no inquiry.]

PAGE 147

cover-page

This is a cover page containing various FBI date and time stamps indicating receipt of a document.

RECEIVED
F B I
COMMUNICATIONS
MAY 12 9 05 PM '52

[HANDWRITTEN: A]

REC'D-BELMONT
F B I
MAY 12 10 12 PM '52

RECEIVED
MAY 13 10 20 AM '52
F B I
INTERNAL SECURITY
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

CORRELATION-LIAISON
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
MAY 13 3 54 PM '52

PAGE 148

memo

A memo from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to the Air Force regarding reports of flying disks seen by DuPont employees at the Savannah River Plant on May 10, 1952.

[HANDWRITTEN: Declassified 2040 9/9/77 APM.]

Date: May 15, 1952
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.

From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Subject: FLYING DISKS REPORTEDLY SEEN
IN VICINITY OF SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

[HANDWRITTEN: awk]

The Savannah Office of this Bureau has been informed that at approximately 10:45 p.m., May 10, 1952, four employees of the DuPont Company employed in the Savannah River Plant near Ellenton, South Carolina, saw four disk shaped objects approaching "the four hundred area" from the south which disappeared in a northerly direction. At approximately 11:05 p.m. on the same date the above-mentioned employees saw two similar objects approach from the south and disappear in a northerly direction. At approximately 11:10 p.m. a similar object was seen by these employees approaching from the north-east and disappearing in a southwesterly direction. A similar object was also sighted about 11:15 pm traveling from south to north by the same employees.

The disks were described by the above-mentioned employees as being approximately fifteen inches in diameter and yellow to gold in color. All of the objects were allegedly traveling at a high rate of speed and at a high altitude without any noise. The disk shaped objects referred to above which approached "the four hundred area" from a northeasterly direction was reportedly traveling at such a low altitude it had to rise to pass over some tall tanks which are in "the four hundred area." The employees referred to above advised the objects were weaving from left to right but seemed to hold a general course. According to these persons because of the speed at which the objects were traveling they were only visible for a few seconds.

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Nichols, Belmont, Clegg, Glavin, Harbo, Rosen, Tracy, Laughlin, Mohr, Tele. Rm., Holloman, Gandy]

RECORDED 38
INDEXED 38
62-83894-276
SECURITY INFORMATION - FBI
[HANDWRITTEN: 769]
MAY 29 1952
EHM:awy
MAY 15 1952
MAILED 25

PAGE 149

memo

This is the second page of a memo regarding the distribution of information to various government agencies, including the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, and the Atomic Energy Commission, noting that the FBI is not conducting an investigation.

SECURITY INFORMATION [REDACTED]

The above data, which was previously furnished to your office through this Bureau's liaison representative, is being furnished for your information and any action you desire to take in this matter. No investigation is being conducted by this Bureau.

cc - Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2
Department of the Army
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.

Attention: Chief, Intelligence Division

cc - Director of Naval Intelligence
Department of the Navy
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.

cc - Captain John A. Waters
Director of Security
Atomic Energy Commission
Room 805B
333 Third Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.

BY SPECIAL MESSENGER

- 2 -

SECURITY INFORMATION - [REDACTED]

PAGE 150

memo

An FBI teletype from the Louisville office reporting a sighting of strange objects over Ashland, Kentucky, on May 25, 1952.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
MAY 26 1952
TELETYPE

FBI LOUISVILLE 5-26-52 12-37 PM CDST
DIRECTOR, FBI DEFERRED

RE FLYING SAUCERS, INFORMATION CONCERNING. THREE WOMEN SAW ASTRANGE OBJECTS FLOATING IN SKY OVER ASHLAND , KY. AT EIGHT FIFTY PM, EST, MAY TWENTY FIVE LAST FOR TWO OR THREE MINUTES. OBJECTS DESCRIBED AS LOOKING LIKE LARGE OYSTERS WITH FISHTAILS FLOATING LOW LIKE A CLOUD. THEY WERE OVAL IN SHAPE AND ACCORDING TO OBSERVERS COULD HAVE BEEN BALLOONS. THEY CAME IN OVER ASHLAND FROM THE NORTH, CIRCLED AND WENT BACK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. ABOVE INFORMATION FOR BUREAU. NO ACTION HERE.

MULONE

ACK AND HOLD
1-33PM OK FBI WA JT
[HANDWRITTEN: 41]
[HANDWRITTEN: 1 JUN 18 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] Col Advised [ILLEGIBLE]]
RECORDED - 5
162-83894-277
JUN 3 1952
12
[EX-83]

PAGE 151

memo

A brief FBI communication memo regarding a report of three women observing large oval objects in the sky over Ashland, Kentucky, on May 26, 1952.

RECEIVED
F B I
COMMUNICATIONS
MAY 26 1 34 PM '52

[HANDWRITTEN: 65-83422-8961]

DIRECTOR, FBI

RE LEAFY SPRINGS, INFORMATION CONCERNING THREE WOMEN SAW LARGE
OBJECTS FLOATING IN THE SKY ASHLAND, KY. METEOR LIKELY BUT
MAY WANT SOME TEST FOR TWO OR THREE MINUTES. OBJECTS DESCRIBED AS
LOOKING LIKE LARGE OVALS WITH TRAILS MOVING FOR MILE OR MORE.
THEY WERE SEEN IN SHAPE AND ACCORDING TO OBSERVERS COULD DISAPPEAR.
BYTROOMS MAY 27 10 35 AM '52 MOVING FROM THE NORTH, CIRCLED AND THEN
BACK IN THE S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, ABOVE INFORMATION FOR BUREAU. NO
ACTION NECESSARY.

F. B. I.
COMMUNICATION-LIAISON
MAY 26 2 04 PM '52

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
DEPT. OF JUSTICE

[HANDWRITTEN: REC'D ESPIO B]

MAY 26 2 59

COMMUNICATION LIAISON
F B I
DEPT OF JUSTICE
MAY 27 1 35 PM '52

PAGE 152

memo

A memo from the Department of the Air Force to the FBI regarding an unidentified aerial object sighting by Donald Stewart, noting that Stewart was in possession of a Thompson sub-machine gun at the time.

CONFIDENTIAL
SECURITY INFORMATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

28 MAY 1952

24-185

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
U. S. Department of Justice
Washington 25, D. C.

[HANDWRITTEN: Received from OSI Date 6/5/52]
[HANDWRITTEN: Gilliland]

ATTN: Mr. N. W. [REDACTED], Liaison Agent

RE: Unidentified Aerial Object Sighted
General Area Ritchie Highway, South
Baltimore, Maryland, 10:45 PM, 29
Mar 52 by Donald Stewart, 2241 Warren
Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland

[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]

Dear Sir:

There is attached for your information a copy of a report by Special
Agent Boyce Royal of this office dated May 12, 1952, in regard to the
captioned subject. Your attention is invited to the statement of Mr.
Donald Stewart as reflected on page 4, paragraph 7, of the report, to the
effect that, at the time of the alleged sighting of this object, he had
in his possession a Thompson sub-machine gun. A copy of this attachment
has also been furnished the Treasury Department.

No further inquiry into this matter is contemplated by the Office
of Special Investigations.

Sincerely,

[HANDWRITTEN: Gilbert R. Levy]
GILBERT R. LEVY
Chief, Counter Intelligence Division
Directorate of Special Investigations
The Inspector General

[HANDWRITTEN: 1 Xero copy to BA without
black enclo by let ser 105-1126 24
mm 7/30/52]

1 Incl
Rpt by SA Royal dtd 12 May 52

RECORDED - 129
INDEXED - 129
EX-130

[HANDWRITTEN: 102-83894-228]
JUN 6 1952

CONFIDENTIAL
SECURITY INFORMATION

PAGE 153

report

This is an OSI report of investigation regarding a reported UFO sighting near Baltimore, Maryland, on March 29, 1952, which was later recanted by one of the witnesses.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION

FILE NO.
24-411

DATE
MAY 12 1952

REPORT MADE BY
BOYCE ROYAL, S/A

REPORT MADE AT
DO #4, BOLLING AFB

PERIOD
10, 11, 12 May 1952

OFFICE OF ORIGIN
Hq. OSI

STATUS
RUC

TITLE
UNKNOWN SUBJECT:
Sighting of Unidentified Aerial
Object, Ritchie Highway, SO.
Baltimore, Maryland, 29 March 1952

CHARACTER
SPECIAL INQUIRY

REFERENCE
Telephone message CI Division Hq. OSI, 9 May 1952

SYNOPSIS
Investigation requested by Hq. OSI predicated on information received from Air Technical Intelligence Center, Wright Patterson AFB that DONALD STEWART and (FNU) TYLER had observed unconventional type aircraft on 29 March 1952 in the vicinity of Baltimore, Maryland. Information relayed to Air Technical Intelligence Center, Wright Patterson AFB by ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS who received it from LOU CORBIN, a news commentator, employed by station WFBR, Baltimore, Md. CORBIN interviewed, furnished information that DONALD STEWART, 224 Warren Avenue and GEORGE TYLER III, 112 East Montgomery St., Baltimore, Md., had been interviewed by him on 24 and 27 April 1952 and had reported sighting a disc-like aircraft at approximately 2045 hours, 29 March 1952 on Ritchie Highway near the intersection of US Route 301; that automobile engine stopped and paint cracked as aircraft hovered 200 feet above car. STEWART interviewed and related substantially the same story which he had given CORBIN previously. RAY FOX, Engineer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Baltimore, Md, interviewed, advised he had made complete examination of STEWART's vehicle at request of CORBIN; including examination with geiger counter and determined no unusual defects. AMOSS interviewed, stated had no direct knowledge of incident and had merely relayed information furnished him by CORBIN; advised that several residents, Gibson Island, Maryland had heard unusual noises but none had observed any such aircraft. TYLER interviewed and confirmed statement given by STEWART however, upon reinterview, admitted that he had not been with STEWART at the time of the alleged sighting, and had not seen any such aircraft; advised that STEWART had asked him to tell that story and that he had done so. Interviews conducted along Ritchie Highway in vicinity of location where aircraft

DISTRIBUTION
Hq. OSI (action) 4
File 2

APPROVED
[HANDWRITTEN: DONALD B. WHITE]
DONALD B. WHITE
Colonel, USAF
District Commander.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-278]

AFHQ FORM 15 JAN 49 O-208 Replaces AFCSI Form 4, 23 Jul 48, which may be used. SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 154

report

This page is a continuation of a synopsis regarding an investigation into a reported aircraft sighting, noting that local police had no record of the event, and providing background information on the witness STEWART, including his termination for placing a Communist decal on a company truck.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

SYNOPSIS (Cont'd)

was allegedly sighted indicated no knowledge of any such craft. Anne Arundel County Police Department had no record of reports of described aircraft. STEWART in reinterview reaffirmed sighting and that TYLER had been with him at the time and had seen the aircraft. File checks re STEWART at local police agencies negative. FBI, Baltimore Field Office records reflect STEWART fired from employment at Baltimore, Maryland, for placing a decal bearing Communist insignia on a truck belonging to the firm by whom he was employed. FBI check re TYLER, CORBIN, AMOSS negative.

la

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 155

report

This report details an investigation into an unidentified aircraft sighting on 29 March 1952 near Baltimore, Maryland, involving witness accounts from Donald Stewart and others, as well as weather data from the U.S. Weather Bureau.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

DETAILS:

1. This investigation was initiated upon a request from Headquarters OSI on 9 May 1952 from Lt. Col. LUCIUS L. FREE, predicated upon information received from Lt. Col. RAY W. TAYLOR, Air Technical Intelligence Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, to the effect that Col. TAYLOR had received information regarding an unidentified aircraft which was reported to have been seen at 2245 hours, 29 March 1952, on Ritchie Highway, south of Baltimore, Maryland. Air Technical Intelligence Center advised that the information had been received from ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS, a civilian.

2. This is a joint investigation of Special Agents CLIFFORD P. JONES, OLIVER R. WEATHERHOLT, and the writer.

AT WASHINGTON, D. C.

3. On 10 May 1952 Lt. Col. LUCIUS L. FREE, Headquarters OSI, was interviewed and furnished the writer with a copy of a TWX received from the Air Intelligence Center, Wright-Patterson AFB. Information contained in the TWX is summarized as follows:

The TWX represents a copy of a letter to the Commanding General, Project Blue Book, from ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS, Gibson Island, Maryland, dated 24 April 1952. The letter stated that one DONALD STEWART, residing at 2241 Warren Avenue, Baltimore 30, Maryland, had observed an unconventional type aircraft on 29 March 1952. Present with him at the time of this observation was one FNU TYLER, believed to be a seventeen year old (17) high school student. The aircraft was allegedly observed while STEWART and TYLER were driving north on Ritchie Highway, approaching Baltimore, Maryland. It was described as shaped like a large pancake and was alleged to have hovered over the automobile, killing the engine. The letter also advised that STEWART had been interviewed by a LOU CORBIN, a radio announcer of WFER, Baltimore radio station. CORBIN was described as a reserve CIC officer. The letter also stated that a GEORGE MASON and son, JOHN MASON, alleged to reside on Yacht Club Road, RIVIERA Beach, Maryland, had also seen such an aircraft. A NELSON STRIEKCIRUT and wife, and a Mrs. SALLY SYMINGTON HENDERSON and Judge and Mrs. HENDERSON were all said to have heard an aerial noise on 19 April 1952 at approximately 2300 hours. The Glenn Burnie Police were said to have had many similar incidents reported but laughed them off.

AT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND

4. On 10 May 1952 Mr. HUBERT KETTH, U. S. Weather Bureau, International Friendship Airport, Baltimore, Maryland, advised that the weather map for 2226 hours, 29 March 1952, indicated clear sky, NNW winds - eight (8) miles per hour; at 2256 hours, 29 March 1952, partly

2

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 156

report

This report details an interview with Mr. Louis E. Corbin regarding his investigation into a UFO sighting reported by Donald F. Stewart and George S. Tyler III on March 29, 1952, in Baltimore, Maryland.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

cloudy, NNW winds - twelve (12) miles per hour; winds aloft at one thousand (1000) feet, NNW - sixteen (16) miles per hour.

5. On 10 May 1952 Mr. LOUIS E. CORBIN was interviewed at radio station WFER in Baltimore, Maryland, and stated in substance as follows:

Mr. CORBIN advised that he had received information in the latter part of April to the effect that a DONALD F. STEWART, residing at 224 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, had, while accompanied by Mr. GEORGE S. TYLER III, observed a strange appearing aircraft on 29 March 1952. Mr. CORBIN indicated that the source of his information had been a newspaper reporter for one of the local newspapers, whose name he did not divulge. CORBIN related that he had for some time been interested in the "flying saucer situation", and that it had been his intention to write a documentary program for broadcast concerning that subject. He said further that inasmuch as the above incident was the first one to be brought to his attention within that area, he determined to investigate it.

On 24 April 1952 CORBIN interviewed Mr. DONALD F. STEWART and ascertained that he was employed as a clerk by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad. He further ascertained that the date of observation was 29 March 1952; place, Ritchie Highway near the harness track; time, 10:45 PM; weather, clear; moon and stars out; approximate length of observation, two (2) minutes; estimated altitude, two hundred (200) feet. CORBIN obtained the details of the incident and set them down in a chronological order. A photostatic reproduction of the information obtained in that interview is being forwarded as an inclosure to this report. CORBIN also interviewed Mr. GEORGE S. TYLER III relative to the above incident and made a similar writing, a photostatic reproduction of which is being forwarded as an inclosure to this report.

CORBIN advised the writer that he was acquainted with the editor of a civilian intelligence bulletin, Mr. ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS, to whom he communicated the above information. Mr. CORBIN further advised that he would not release any of the information publicly and did not intend to do so until such time as the authorities completed investigation of the incident. CORBIN related that when he had called the Anne Arundel County Police they had informed him that they had had numerous reports of that nature but had passed them off as harmless. CORBIN stated that he had had a friend of his, RAYMOND FOX, conduct a scientific examination of STEWART's automobile for the purpose of determining any unusual characteristics which might have been present. CORBIN advised that he was not a reserve CIC officer; however, he related that he had been an intelligence officer with the staff of General GEORGE S. PATTON in Europe and that he presently holds an inactive reserve commission as lieutenant colonel, 0-375086.

3

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 157

report

This report details an interview with Donald Franklin Stewart regarding his sighting of an unconventional aircraft on March 29, 1952, while driving near Baltimore, Maryland, and includes background information on Stewart from FBI records.

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. CORBIN, during the course of the interview, made no mention of GEORGE or JOHN MASON, and when specifically questioned with regards to the two above individuals, he said that he did not recall either.

6. On 10 May 1952 the records of the FBI Field Office, Baltimore, Maryland, were reviewed and reflected that DONALD FRANKLIN STEWART, 224 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, was questioned for illegal wearing of the Navy uniform in July 1948. Records also reflect that STEWART was a member of the U. S. Naval Reserve and the investigation was discontinued as no violation. These records also reflect that STEWART was fired from the Baltimore Supply Company, Baltimore, Maryland, for placing a decal of the hammer and sickle and red star on the door of a Baltimore Supply Company truck. This act was committed on 30 July 1948. The FBI Field Office records reflect no records of ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS and no derogatory information on LOUIS E. CORBIN. No information concerning reports of unconventional aircraft sighted during the past two (2) years were on record at the FBI Field Office.

7. Mr. DONALD FRANKLIN STEWART was interviewed at his residence, 224 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, on 10 May 1952, and with reference to the incident in instant case, he related in substance as follows:

STEWART, accompanied by his friend, GEORGE TYLER, were returning to Baltimore from Glenn Burnie, Maryland, via the Ritchie Highway, on 29 March 1952. They were in a 1949 Anglia Vampire, an English car, and were proceeding in a northerly direction, having just left a Howard Johnson Restaurant adjacent to the intersection of Ritchie Highway and U. S. Highway #301. While approximately opposite a harness track five hundred (500) yards north of the above named intersection, STEWART related, he observed a strange looking aircraft appearing on the horizon ahead of his automobile. STEWART described the aircraft as being a flat disk with a cupola or dome in the center of one side. He described the dome as having what appeared to be a small porthole on one side and the shadowy outline of what appeared to be a "hatch, similar to those found on a ship". He stated that this craft approached his vehicle from a northeasterly direction and hovered above his automobile.

He further described the object as being of a luminous silver color and emitting bright lights around the edges similar to neon tubing of high brilliance. He stated that at the time the incident occurred he had in the rear seat of his vehicle a Thompson sub-machine gun with which weapon he left the automobile and walked around the car several times debating as to whether or not he should fire upon the aircraft. He advised that his companion, TYLER, remained in the automobile and had pleaded with him not to discharge the weapon for fear of retaliation from the aircraft. Mr. STEWART declined to comment as to the origin, present whereabouts, or owner of the above named weapon.

4
SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 158

report

This report details a witness statement from an individual named Stewart regarding his observation of an unidentified aircraft, its physical effects on his vehicle, and his personal background.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

STEWART stated that when the aircraft came to rest above his automobile, it appeared to be "at least fifty feet (50) in diameter, and wavered slightly." While in sight the aircraft gave off a sound similar to that of a vacuum cleaner. STEWART averred that the aircraft maintained its position above the automobile for approximately three (3) minutes and then turned on its edge, thereby presenting its flat surface to his vision, and appeared to roll across the sky at a terrific rate of speed, greater than that of a jet plane. STEWART estimated the horizon to the southwest of his vision, towards which the object was traveling, as approximately three and one-half (3 1/2) miles from his position, and that the object as it disappeared across the horizon was approximately the dimension of a five (5) inch disk held at arm's length. He advised that when the object first appeared, it appeared to be at an angle to the horizon of fifty (50) degrees, and as he was proceeding north it appeared on the northeast horizon on the crest of a hill. He also advised that during the period the object was in his vision he noticed no sign of activity within it and discerned no odor from it.

STEWART advised that during the time of the above observation of the aircraft there was only one other automobile in the immediate vicinity. He described this to be a 1948 Pontiac convertible, yellow, with 1952 Maryland license plates, the first three (3) digits of which were six-zero-zero (600). He related that the car was apparently occupied by a man and a woman and that the man had dismounted his automobile and was looking at the aircraft, but that upon being hailed by STEWART, had returned to his automobile and driven off rapidly. It was Mr. STEWART's opinion that he did so upon seeing the aforementioned Thompson sub-machine gun. Mr. STEWART informed the writer that he was not addicted to or a casual indulger of any form of alcoholic beverages and was not under such influence at the time of the sighting. He further advised that he wore glasses only for purposes of reading and that the only obstruction to his observation of the above described aircraft was the windshield of his automobile when first sighted; however, when he emerged from the automobile he was able to observe the aircraft without any trouble.

STEWART contended that the above incident had a singular effect upon his automobile in that it killed the motor and apparently magnetized its wiring. He also stated that the above incident had resulted in the paint on his car cracking.

AGENT'S NOTE: An inspection of STEWART's automobile revealed that it had been recently painted.

It was ascertained from STEWART that his hobbies were the collection and handling of weapons, American History, and that his avocation was politics. He stated that he had been active in the political candidacy of a senatorial contestant of the State of Maryland and was currently leader of the political club supporting the above mentioned candidate in his ward. He advised that on the night of the

5

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 159

report

This page contains witness interviews and investigative findings regarding an individual named Stewart, including character references and a technical examination of an automobile by a Westinghouse engineer.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

above incident he had been engaged in distributing campaign literature with reference to the above campaigning in Glenn Burnie, Maryland, and was returning to Baltimore when he observed the aircraft. During the course of the above interview STEWART appeared calm and answered all questions without hesitation and when subjected to requestioning, did not change his statements in any particular.

AT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND

8. Mr. LOUIS GITEOS, 228 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, was interviewed on 10 May 1952, and stated that he has known STEWART all his life and has found no fault with him. GITEOS advised that STEWART comes from a good family and he would recommend him for a position of trust. GITEOS stated that he does not believe STEWART has ever been in trouble with the police.

9. Miss MARY HOOVER, 226 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, was interviewed on 10 May 1952 and stated that STEWART "shoots a lot of bull", usually bragging about himself and his accomplishments. Outside of talking too much, HOOVER believes that STEWART is honest, makes a good impression, does not drink, a good worker, and loyal to the government. She would recommend STEWART for a position of trust, but stated that she did not believe he could keep a secret.

10. Mrs. LOUIS GITEOS, 228 Warren Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, was interviewed on 10 May 1952 and stated that STEWART talks too much and likes to exaggerate. Other than that, Mrs. GITEOS would recommend STEWART for a position of trust. She considers him honest, loyal, and a good boy.

11. Mr. RAYMOND FOX, Project Engineer, Engineering Department, Radioactive Detection Division, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, was interviewed on the Maryland Yacht Club on 10 May 1952, and advised that during the latter part of April 1952 he examined the automobile described in the above paragraph with a geiger counter and could detect no radioactive reaction. He also stated that he examined the engine and all working parts of the automobile and was unable to detect any unusual defects or characteristics. He stated that the automobile had been repainted and that he was inclined to disbelieve the incident as it was related to him.

AT FERNDALE, MARYLAND

12. On 10 May 1952 Officer J. L. GAVIN, Anne Arundel County Police Department, Ritchie Highway Sub-Station, advised that the only report relative to instant investigation that he was aware of as being received by the department was purported to have been an observation during the latter part of March by the bridge keeper, Curtis Bay Bridge, Curtis Bay, Maryland. Officer GAVIN volunteered that the proximity of that area to the Aberdeen Proving Grounds resulted in frequent noises of explosions

6

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 160

report

This report details an interview with Colonel Ulius Louis Amoss regarding reports of unconventional aircraft and loud noises in the Gibson Island, Maryland area, as well as follow-up attempts to contact other potential witnesses.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

and that the police department had many calls of inquiry but that they all, with the above exception, were reports of noise and not of the sighting of any such aircraft. Officer GAVIN stated that in his opinion it was highly unlikely that an automobile could stop for a period of three (3) minutes on a Saturday night, as during the time of the alleged incident, without several other vehicles passing by. He gave as his reasons that Ritchie Highway was an arterial highway for several outlying districts of Baltimore as well as being a portion of the north-south route from Baltimore to the Potomac Bridge, and that traffic was usually frequent at all times, and especially so during that part of the evening on weekends.

AT GIBSON ISLAND, MARYLAND

13. ULIUS LOUIS AMOSS, Colonel, USA, Retired, residing at 8 Cotterhill Road, Gibson Island, Maryland, was interviewed on 11 May 1952 with reference to his knowledge of above alleged sighting of an unconventional aircraft. He stated in substance that his knowledge was third-hand and therefore he was not in a position to give detailed information. He advised that he was informed of the above incident by CORBIN who, in addition to the information set forth above, had told him that a GEORGE MASON and his son, JOHN MASON, purported to reside on Yacht Club Road, Riviera Beach, Maryland, also had information with reference to instant incident.

AMOSS stated that the residents of Gibson Island frequently heard noises in the night, reported like that produced by a large formation of conventional aircraft. Col. AMOSS described this noise as of a magnitude and intensity similar to a major bombing group of at least one hundred (100) planes. He advised that Mr. and Mrs. NELSON STINCHCOMB (whom he previously reported as STRIEKCIRUT), and Judge and Mrs. HENDERSON, Sr., and Mrs. SALLY HENDERSON SYMINGTON had all reported loud noises of the above type on the night of Saturday, 19 April 1952, and that he had included this information in his letter to General ACKERMAN only as miscellaneous data. He related that the noises occurred nightly but were particularly intense on Thursday nights.

Col. AMOSS informed the writer that he had attempted to locate GEORGE and JOHN MASON but had been unable to contact them. He stated that there was no street designated Yacht Club Road at Riviera Beach, Maryland, and that the nearest approximation of that name was Club Road. He further stated that there was only one residence on Club Road and that residence was presently occupied by a Mr. GEORGE REA, whom he was unable to contact.

14. Attempts by the writer to interview individuals named in the preceding paragraph met with negative results.

7
SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 161

report

This page contains witness interview summaries from May 11, 1952, regarding an alleged UFO incident, including statements from Robert Meadows, William Roelecke, Jr., Mahlen Hollins, George S. Tyler III, and George S. Tyler, Jr.

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

AT GLENN BURNIE, MARYLAND

15. Mr. ROBERT MEADOWS, Proprietor of a Shell Service Station, located at 1501 Ritchie Highway, approximately three hundred (300) yards north of the intersection of Ritchie Highway and U. S. Route #301, was interviewed on 11 May 1952, and advised that to the best of his recollection he had been on duty in the station on the night the above incident was said to have occurred, and that to his knowledge no such incident took place. MEADOWS related that had the aircraft traveled in the direction as alleged, he would surely have observed it; or if he had not been on duty that night, he would surely have been informed of the incident by the man who had been on duty at the time. MEADOWS informed the writer that it was highly unlikely in his opinion that any three (3) minute period could elapse without the passage of several automobiles at the time the above incident was alleged to have occurred.

16. Mr. WILLIAM ROELECKE, Jr., employee of Howard Johnson Restaurant, located at the intersection of Ritchie Highway and U. S. Route #301, was interviewed on 11 May 1952 and advised that he had no knowledge of the above incident.

AT CURTIS BAY, MARYLAND

17. Mr. MAHLEN HOLLINS, Drawbridge Operator, Curtis Bay Bridge, was interviewed on 11 May 1952 and advised that he is the regular drawbridge operator on the Curtis Bay Bridge on the 1600 hours to 2400 hours shift. HOLLINS stated he was on duty the evening of the 29th of March 1952 and that he had not observed, nor ever observed, any unconventional aircraft. HOLLINS further advised that he did not make a report to the Anne Arundale Police Department of such an incident.

AT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND

18. On 11 May 1952 Mr. GEORGE S. TYLER III, aged sixteen (16), 112 E. Montgomery Street, Baltimore, Maryland, was interviewed at 1030 hours and repeated the same story as he related to CORBIN. One variance in the story was that the car engine did not stop until after STEWART and TYLER had gotten out.

19. GEORGE S. TYLER, Jr., father of GEORGE S. TYLER III, was interviewed on 11 May 1952 and stated that STEWART is "off the beam" and "not normal"; at times he is smart, but "too smart". TYLER said his son is a little careless with the truth and he believes the story is made up. TYLER stated STEWART is a peculiar person, and he has known him for several years. TYLER thinks STEWART made it up to get his name in the papers. TYLER also stated that Ritchie Highway is very crowded and more than one person would have seen it. Mr. TYLER thinks that if his son had seen it he would have discussed it with him or some other member of the family, but he did not do so.

8
SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 162

report

This page contains interview summaries regarding a reported UFO sighting, including statements from Louis F. Tyler, George S. Tyler III, and Harold B. Isennock, who performed maintenance on Stewart's vehicle.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

20. On 11 May 1952 LOUIS F. TYLER, uncle of TYLER III, 230 Edge-ville Road, Baltimore 25, Maryland, was interviewed and stated that he does not believe his nephew's story. He stated that TYLER III can dream up fantastic stories at times. He believes it is a hoax and thinks his nephew was talked into telling the story.

21. At approximately 1215 hours, 11 May 1952, GEORGE S. TYLER III was reinterviewed in the presence of his father and mother, at which time TYLER stated that STEWART had seen the "saucer" prior to the time of meeting him and that all the information which he had given was in-formation that STEWART told him. TYLER advised that he did not see a thing and had reported the description of the aircraft as STEWART had told him. He stated that STEWART had told the sighting of the aircraft to him as they returned from Glenn Burnie, Maryland, to Baltimore, and asked him (TYLER) to affirm the report because he feared that no one would believe his story. TYLER advised that he called the newspapers, the Sun and the Post, to find out if anyone else had reported the in-cident, and was informed that several reports had been received. TYLER further stated that at first he believed the story STEWART had told him; however, he now believes that STEWART made it all up. TYLER averred that he had been in Glenn Burnie visiting friends and was waiting at a bus stop to return to Baltimore on the night of 29 March 1952, when he met STEWART who had been in Glenn Burnie posting campaign posters; that STEWART had offered to give him a ride back to Baltimore and he had accepted; that it was on the trip back to Baltimore that STEWART had related to him the sighting of the strange aircraft earlier in the evening.

TYLER stated that they left Glenn Burnie at approximately 2230 hours and had driven to Baltimore without incident; that they had made no stops along the road; that he did not see any sub-machine gun in the automobile as reported by STEWART.

22. STEWART was reinterviewed at approximately 1315 hours, 11 May 1952, and stated that TYLER was with him and had witnessed the incident. STEWART denied emphatically any falsehood in the story and stated that the whole thing was the absolute truth.

23. On 12 May 1952 Special Agent OLIVER R. WEATHERHOLT interviewed Mr. HAROLD B. ISENNOCK at the Griebel Motor Company, Light and Hen-rietta streets, Baltimore, Maryland. Mr. ISENNOCK stated that work was performed on STEWART's car on 8 May; that the work performed was ad-justment of brakes, installation of clutch, adjust generator, repairing or taping the wires leading from the generator, change oil, and lubri-cation. He stated that the car needed only routine repairs and there was no indication of any unusual repairs.

Mr. ISENNOCK advised that STEWART had traded at the garage regularly and that he considered him a "screwball". Review of the

9

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 163

report

This report page details garage service records for a vehicle, notes the lack of police records for an individual named Stewart, and lists two inclosures related to information obtained by Corbin from Stewart and Tyler.

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

records at the garage reflected that the car had been serviced on 23 April, 8 December, 18 December 1951; and 31 January, 20 March, and 8 May 1952. The records reflected that the car had been brought in for routine check-ups and repairs. There was no indication in the records that the car had been repainted. Mr. ISENNOCK stated that the car was still the same green color; however, he could not state as to whether it had been recently repainted. He did state he knew the car had not been repainted at his garage.

24. On 12 May 1952 records checks at the Baltimore City Police Department, Baltimore County Police, and Maryland State Police reflected no records of STEWART.

INCLOSURES

FOR HEADQUARTERS OSI

1. Photostatic reproduction of information obtained from STEWART by CORBIN (with sketch).

2. Photostatic reproduction of information obtained from TYLER by CORBIN.

C L O S E D

10

SECURITY INFORMATION--CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 164

report

This is an interview report from Project Eyeful documenting a UFO sighting by Donald F. Stewart and George Tyler on March 29, 1952, near the Harness Track on Ritchie Highway.

INTERVIEW # 1. -------- THURSDAY --- APRIL 24, 1952 --- PROJECT EYEFUL

NAME: Mr. Donald F. Stewart , ADDRESS : 224 Warren Avenue , Balto. 30, MD.

TELEPHONE NUMBER: SAratoga 1423 , AGE: 23

EMPLOYMENT: B. and O. Railroad ---- Clerical Work

DATE OF OBSERVATION: March 29, 1952 PLACE: Ritchie Highway -- Harness Track

TIME OF OBSERVATION: 10:45 P.M. WEATHER: Clear --- MOON and STARS OUT

APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF OBSERVATION: TWO MINUTES

ESTIMATED ALTITUDE: 200 FEET

DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT:

At approximately 10:45 P.M. on Saturday, March 29, 1952, near the Harness Track on Ritchie Highway, The above in company with a Mr. George Tyler of East Montgomery Street in Baltimore, witnessed the following:
A sound similar to a vacuum cleaner attracted attention.
Upon investigation, while traveling north toward Baltimore, a strange object was proceeding in the sky in an approximate north-south direction. It appeared to be moving very slowly (considerably slower than a commercial airliner).
WITNESS SKETCH ATTACHED -------
This object was estimated to be at least as large as a two motored transport plane. It hovered directly over the highway and over the automobile. After approximately two minutes, it suddenly turned perpendicular with a whirring sound and seemed to roll down the sky with fantastic speed like a rocket.

PAGE 165

transcript

This document is a transcript of an interview regarding a UFO sighting that caused car engines to fail, followed by an appraisal by an individual identified as R.F.

INTERVIEW # 1 --- page 2

When the object was over the highway the car engine died suddenly and remained dead until it departed. A yellow Pontiac convertible traveling south along the highway experienced the same situation. Occupants in all cars were very frightened. The automobile, A British Ford was taken to Griebel Motors on Light St. They over-hauled the entire car. A friend, Mr. Kenny Johnson, an electrician, in a repair shop said something about wiring being magnetized. Mr. Johnson had previously been an aviation Jet mechanic during the war. Mr. Stewart is not sufficiently familiar with the technical situation to recall his exact explanation.

A check with the Glenn Burnie Police on this date April 24th, indicated that several times during this year the Headquarters at Glenn Burnie Police were notified concerning a curious object in the sky. The Police have always considered the source of such objects as being Aberdeen Proving Grounds. In all events the Police have not conducted a detailed investigation as a result of any such call to their headquarters.

****************************************

General summary of an appraisal made by "R.F."

Several checks of the automobile apparently indicated a negative reaction.....safe to conclude that something was observed in the sky. A thorough examination of the witness suggests that it's unlikely he could have made up a story. His reported observations are aero-dynamically possible and fall into a logical sequence. Impossible at the moment to identify object or its origin.....SPECULATION: Possibly "ours".

PAGE 166

diagram

A hand-drawn sketch of a disc-shaped object with handwritten notes describing its light characteristics.

[HANDWRITTEN: Light - Kept FADING - Light sort of A white phosphorous color. - Bright Around the outer rim -]

PAGE 167

transcript

A transcript of a telephone interview with George S. Tyler III regarding a UFO sighting on March 29, 1952, near Ritchie Highway, where he and a friend observed a slowly-moving, glowing object that caused their car engine to die.

INTERVIEW # 2. ----- SUNDAY ---- APRIL 27, 1952 --- "PROJECT EYEFUL".

NAME: MR. George S. Tyler III ADDRESS: 122 East Montgomery St. Balto.,

TELEPHONE NUMBER: BLaza 2119 AGE: 17

EMPLOYMENT : Southern Highschool ---- Third Year.

DATE OF OBSERVATION March 29, 1952 PLACE: Ritchie Highway --- Harness Track

TIME OF OBSERVATION : 10:45 P.M. WEATHER: Clear

APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF OBSERVATION : A Minute or so!

ESTIMATED ALTITUDE: Maybe a hundred feet or so

DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT:

(THIS WAS A TELEPHONE INTERVIEW ---- THE YOUNG MAN WAS REQUIRED TO REMAIN AT HOME TO WATCH HIS SISTER. HE WAS UNABLE TO COME TO STUDIO AS PLANNED EARLIER.)

Attention was first attracted while driving north along Ritchie highway toward Baltimore. In company with Mr. Donald Stewart, a friend, a slowly-moving object was observed just ahead of the automobile. It was approximately 10:45 P.M. The engine in the car seemed to die and car drifted to a stop, the driver pulling slightly off the road. The object was approximately over the car and had no forward motion. It seemed to be tilted slightly and was giving off a yellowish-greenish light which faded and then grew intense and then fade again. The outer edges of this object which seemed to be round with a thickness toward the center, seemed to have what Mr. Tyler described as St. Elmos fire. He said that he could not say for sure whether he had observed anything that looked like a port hole. He stated he wasn't sure either whether there was another car in the exact location, but there might [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE].

PAGE 168

blank

This is a blank page containing only a handwritten file reference number at the top.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-278]

PAGE 169

transcript

This document is a transcript of an interview with a witness (Mr. Tyler) regarding a UFO sighting, including his observations of the object's behavior and an unexplained incident involving his car engine starting on its own.

INTERVIEW # 2 --- 2

have been one a few yards soth of where he was. He indicated that he was quite "astounded" at what he saw. He indicated that he was slightly scared for fear people would think he and his friend had made up the story just to get some publicity, but felt better when the newspapers had told them that others had reported a strange object in the sky. As a note of interest, the young man confided that since he got home rather late that Saturday evening his parents had confined him to the premises. He wasn't allowed to go out with the boys for awhile. PERSONAL OBSERVATION ---- Mr. Tyler seemed a good deal more conservative than his friend, Mr. Stewart. He is on the LaCrosse Team at Southern Highschool. He seemed (at least over the phone) to be fairly intelligent. He stated that Mr. Stewart was in his opinion a great deal more excited about it than he was.

There were several after-thoughts occuring to him during the conversation. Some of these are as follows: The object when it departed increased in altitude and then sped off with a dazzling speed....faster than anything he had ever seen before. He also said that its highest altitude was still considerably lower than most commercial planes he has seen over his home. As it was increasing in height just prior to leaving he thought he could detect a highly polished surface which resembled a chrome plate. As it sped away it seemed also to have a short yellowish-greenish exhaust. All the time it was hovering, he stated the object was wavering slightly.

He add this toward the end of his story.......I know this doesn't make sense, but I'd swear the engine on that car started up on its own. To him the car seemed to run all right the rest of the way into Baltimore. He admits the car engine starting up has him baffled. But he said definitely that it wasn't started by his friend. He added....it doesn't make sense. In closing the conversation he added again.....I'll stick to my story....we saw something and you can be sure we didn't make this up to get publicity.

PAGE 170

memo

This FBI memorandum discusses the history of photographs of a flying disc taken by William Albert Rhodes in 1947 and the subsequent handling of the negatives by the FBI and the Army Air Force.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : A. H. Belmont DATE: June 10, 1952
FROM : W. A. Branigan
SUBJECT: WILLIAM ALBERT RHODES
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING
FLYING DISCS

PURPOSE
To recommend that Bureau Liaison contact OSI to determine whether photographs allegedly taken by the captioned individual of a flying disc in 1947 were furnished by OSI to the office of Drew Pearson.

BACKGROUND
Bureau files reflect that on August 29, 1947, a Mr. George Fugate, Jr., called at the Phoenix Office exhibiting credentials reflecting he represented A-2, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California. He asked an Agent to accompany him to interview William Rhodes who previously reported the photographing of a flying disc in Phoenix on the afternoon of July 7, 1947.

The Phoenix Office contacted SAC Harry Kimball of the San Francisco Office and Mr. Kimball verified the fact that Fugate came to Phoenix as a representative of Colonel Donald Springer of Hamilton Field, and it was suggested the Phoenix Office assist Fugate not in investigating the matter, but in simply talking with Dr. Rhodes.

By letter dated September 4, 1947, the Phoenix Office set forth in four pages the results of this interview and stated Fugate had requested the negatives from Rhodes who did not have them in his immediate possession. Rhodes stated, however, he would deliver them to the FBI the following morning for transmittal to Fugate at Hamilton Field, California.

On the morning of August 30, 1947, Rhodes delivered the negatives to the Phoenix Office at which time they were accepted with the understanding they were being given to Mr. Fugate, a representative of the Army Air Force Intelligence, United States Army, and that there was little, if any, chance of his getting the negatives back. Mr. Rhodes turned the negatives over to the FBI with the full understanding they were being given to the Air Force and he would not get them back. (62-83894-80, page 4)

[HANDWRITTEN: 108] [HANDWRITTEN: 61 JUN 1952] EHM:elw [HANDWRITTEN: memo from mr. Keay 6/17/52] [HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED INDEXED] [HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894] [HANDWRITTEN: JUN 18 1952] [HANDWRITTEN: 5-8-52]

PAGE 171

memo

A memorandum from A. A. Rosen to A. H. Belmont regarding the review of FBI files for photographs of flying discs and the historical involvement of the FBI in investigating such sightings.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

TO : A. H. Belmont
FROM : A. A. Rosen
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

DATE: June 10, 1952

To recommend that Bureau files be reviewed to determine whether photographs of flying discs are available in the files of the Bureau.

Bureau files reflect that on June 29, 1947, the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2, Department of the Army, requested that the FBI assist in the investigation of flying discs. It was suggested that the FBI alert its field offices to report any information concerning such sightings.

The field offices contacted the military and the FBI and it was suggested that the Bureau of Aeronautics of the Department of the Navy be contacted to ascertain if they had any information concerning flying discs. It was noted that the Department of the Navy had no information on this subject.

PAGE 172

memo

This document details correspondence and inquiries regarding photographs taken by Mr. Rhodes of flying discs in 1947, clarifying that the FBI does not possess the negatives and that they were transferred to Air Force Intelligence.

On April 17, 1950, Mr. Rhodes advised the Phoenix Office that True Magazine would like to secure the photographs which he had made available to Air Force Intelligence. At that time Rhodes was referred to OSI, Fourth Air Force Base, San Francisco, California, since they had been made available to this agency by the Phoenix Office on August 30, 1947.

By letter dated June 8, 1949, the Phoenix Office advised the Bureau that on the previous day Mr. Lynn C. Aldrich, OSI representative, Phoenix, Arizona, called the Phoenix Office stating he had been requested by his superiors in San Francisco to obtain detailed information concerning the negatives since Rhodes had requested their return. Aldrich pointed out that Fugate's recollection on the matter was "hazy." OSI requested and was given with Bureau approval a memorandum setting out essentially the information related above concerning this matter. (62-83894, Serials 80, 184, and 225)

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On June 4, 1952, Mr. Fred Blumenthal, in the office of Drew Pearson, called and talked with Special Agent Wick. Blumenthal stated Pearson had been in contact with the captioned individual concerning photographs which Rhodes had taken of flying discs in the Phoenix area in July of 1947. Blumenthal stated the subject told Pearson the FBI borrowed his negatives and when he asked for their return the FBI told him the negatives were not available. Blumenthal inquired whether there was any truth to Rhodes' statement and what the Bureau knew concerning him. It appeared that Pearson was interested in using the photographs on his television program and was desirous of borrowing them from the Bureau or having them returned to the subject.

Mr. Blumenthal was advised by Wick that the FBI did not have in its possession the negatives referred to by Mr. Rhodes and in fact Rhodes knew full well the FBI turned them over to Air Force Intelligence representatives, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California, on August 30, 1947, with the understanding he might never have them returned.

Blumenthal was advised the FBI did not investigate this matter, did not investigate Rhodes, and had no interest whatsoever in the matter other than to accompany the representative from Hamilton Field while interviewing Rhodes. Blumenthal was told that for these reasons, of course, we had no information concerning the reliability of Rhodes.

- 2 -

PAGE 173

memo

This memo discusses the FBI's interaction with Blumenthal regarding photographs of flying discs that were allegedly shown on Drew Pearson's television program on June 8, 1952, and recommends contacting the OSI to verify the source of those photographs.

Blumenthal was most appreciative for receiving this information and said he would contact the office of Special Investigations of the Air Force for what assistance they might be to him. He said also he would straighten out Rhodes, informing him the FBI only as a courtesy to the Air Force representatives received the negatives from him and transmitted them.

It has been reported that Drew Pearson, on his television program of June 8, 1952, demonstrated photographs of flying discs. It is not known whether the photographs displayed by Pearson on his television program are those referred to in the captioned case.

RECOMMENDATION

In order to bring our file in this matter to an up-to-date status and to resolve the question raised by the subject, it is recommended liaison contact OSI and determine whether the photographs displayed by Pearson on his television program of June 8, 1952, are the photographs obtained from the subject in this case. Inasmuch as Blumenthal indicated he would contact the OSI concerning this matter it is believed highly probable that is where the photographs of flying discs were obtained by Pearson's office.

- 3 -

PAGE 174

memo

This memorandum documents an investigation by the FBI into whether Fred Blumenthal, an employee of Drew Pearson, had obtained photographs or negatives of flying discs from William Albert Rhodes. OSI and Air Force Intelligence confirmed that no such inquiries or materials had been received from Blumenthal or Pearson's office.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : MR. A. H. BELMONT [HANDWRITTEN: AB]
FROM : V. P. KEAY [HANDWRITTEN: X]
SUBJECT: WILLIAM ALBERT RHODES
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING
FLYING DISCS
DATE: June 17, 1952

Reference is made to the memorandum captioned
as above dated June 10, 1952, from Mr. Branigan to Mr. Belmont, [HANDWRITTEN: Branigan]
which requested that OSI be contacted to determine if they
turned over negatives of photographs of flying discs taken
by the above-captioned individual to Mr. Fred Blumenthal
who works for Drew Pearson.

Lieutenant Colonel Leroy Barnard and Lieutenant
Colonel E. M. Neville of OSI were both contacted and both
advised that no inquiries had been received by OSI from
Blumenthal.

The Bureau's Air Force Liaison Representative then
contacted Colonel C. M. Young of Air Force Intelligence (A-2)
who likewise advised that no inquiries had been received by
the Office of the Director of Intelligence from Blumenthal or
anyone in Pearson's office. It is noted that matters involving
flying discs are handled by A-2. Colonel Young advised that
it was possible that any inquiries made by Drew Pearson's office
would be made in the Office of the Public Information Officer
of the Air Force. However, Colonel Young contacted the [HANDWRITTEN: A]
Public Information Office, and he was advised that no inquiries
had been received from Drew Pearson's office regarding
flying discs and no photographs or negatives of photographs
of flying discs had ever been furnished to Drew Pearson's
office.

Colonel Young advised that ordinarily when information
regarding flying discs is received by Air Force representatives
in the field, the information is referred to the Air Technical
Intelligence Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton,
Ohio, for research and correlation.

ACTION:
None. The foregoing is for your information.

[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 78] [HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED - 78] [HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-280] [HANDWRITTEN: JUN 18 1952] [HANDWRITTEN: NWP:hke] [HANDWRITTEN: 108] [HANDWRITTEN: 61 JUN 27 1952] [HANDWRITTEN: EX. - 15] [HANDWRITTEN: 5] [HANDWRITTEN: Moseburg] [HANDWRITTEN: 5-Ettn]

PAGE 175

memo

This memo documents an inquiry regarding whether the FBI possessed photographs of flying discs to provide to the U.S. Air Force, concluding that no such inquiries or photographs were on record.

Reference is made to the memorandum dated June 2, 1952, from Mr. A. H. Belmont, which requested that FBI be contacted to determine if [REDACTED] had any photographs of the above-captioned matter to furnish to the U.S. Air Force.

Assistant Director [REDACTED] noted that Colonel [REDACTED] had been contacted and that no inquiries had been received by him.

The Assistant Director's Representative [REDACTED] contacted Mr. [REDACTED] of the U.S. Air Force, who advised that no inquiries have been received by his office from the public concerning these matters. It is noted that flying discs are handled by Colonel [REDACTED] and that it would be possible for the office of the Assistant Director to make inquiries in the office of the Public Information Officer and he was advised that no inquiries had been received from Mr. [REDACTED] regarding flying discs and no photographs of [REDACTED] had been furnished to the U.S. Air Force.

Colonel [REDACTED] advised that inquiries regarding flying discs is received by the [REDACTED] and that the information is referred to the [REDACTED] for review and comment.

[HANDWRITTEN: REC'D ESPIONAGE DEPT. OF JUSTICE JUN 17 1:13 PM '52]

[HANDWRITTEN: REC'D BELMONT F.B.I. DEPT. OF JUSTICE JUN 17 11:45 AM '52]

PAGE 176

cover-page

This is a cover page for a file folder containing handwritten administrative notes, including a case number, recording date, and a name.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-781] [HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED] [HANDWRITTEN: 18 JUN 25 1952] [HANDWRITTEN: Esther Mossburg] [HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED-101]

PAGE 177

other

A front page of the Sunday Graphic newspaper dated July 6, 1952, featuring a story about Oskar Linke, an ex-mayor who claimed to have seen a flying saucer in the Soviet zone.

SUNDAY GRAPHIC
No. 1,943. July 6, 1952

GREAT NEW CHURCHILL SERIES PAGE 8

The most amazing Flying Saucer story of them all
BY THE MAN WHO SAW IT TAKE OFF

[IMAGE: A drawing of a saucer-shaped craft in a forest clearing.]
[IMAGE: A photograph of a man and a young girl looking at a drawing.]

Eye-witness Herr Linke himself directed the artist to produce this vivid impression of the flying saucer as he saw it in the clearing: beside it stand the two members of the crew, who took off in it shortly after.

They saw the Flying Saucer: Oskar Linke and his 12-year-old step-daughter.

[IMAGE: A legal document with a seal and signature.]

Gegenwart abgegeben hat.
Berlin, den 1. Juli 1952
[SIGNATURE: Oskar Linke]
Notar
im Bezirke des Kammergerichts Berlin
Nr. 70 der Urkundenrolle für 1952
Kosten:
Geschäftswert 20.000 DM
(§ 24 RKO)
Gebühr §§ 144, 26, 43 RKO 52.-- DM
Umsatzsteuer 4% 2.08 DM
Zusammen 54.08 DM
Der Notar:
[SIGNATURE: Illegible]

Here is part of the signed, sealed, official deposition which Herr Linke made in Berlin, telling the whole story of his fantastic experience.

Are ‘Flying Saucers’ a Russian invention? Western intelligence officers are now trying to answer this question following sensational reports by 48-year-old ex-Mayor Oskar Linke, who escaped from the Soviet zone. Linke has sworn an oath before a judge that he and his daughter saw two metal-clad figures and a ‘50ft saucer with a 10ft conning tower’ take off from a forest clearing four miles inside the Russian zone.
FULL STORY PAGE 2

PAGE 178

press-release

A newspaper article from the Sunday Graphic reporting on an eyewitness account by Oskar Linke regarding a 'flying saucer' sighting in the Soviet zone of Germany.

2 SUNDAY GRAPHIC, JULY 6, 1952
50 YARDS AWAY - IT TOOK OFF IN A 'FLYING SAUCER'
From ANTONY TERRY, Berlin, Saturday
ARMED with a sensational affidavit sworn by an eye-witness, intelligence officers in West Berlin are to-day investigating one of the most amazing "flying saucer" stories ever reported.
Evidence that a weird contraption--like a 30ft. saucer with a conning tower--took off with a crew of two from a forest clearing in the Soviet zone is being studied at the highest level. It is hoped to answer the big question: Are "flying saucers" a secret new Russian invention?
Man who first brought to light this remarkable story (reported briefly in later editions of the Sunday Graphic last week) is grey-haired, 48-year-old ex-Mayor Oskar Linke, of Glei mershausen, near Meiningen. He escaped from the Russian zone with his wife and six children.
Men in metal
I can now reveal that in the company of West Berlin officials, Herr Linke, with his 11-year-old step-daughter Gabriele, last week swore this solemn and formal affidavit before a judge:-
"I was riding home on my motor-cycle, with Gabriele on the pillion, when a tyre burst near the village of [REDACTED].
"The saucer began to rise: the outer disk whirls faster and faster, rising up the centre "conning-tower," which remains stationary.
machine toward Hasselbach. Gabriele pointed to something about 150 yards away. At first sight, in the half light, I took it for a young deer.
"The deer cautiously, was to now about 60 yards from it.
"I then realised that my first impression had been incorrect. The thing I had seen was really two [REDACTED] roughly a foot and a half the next.
"Out of the metallic object rose a black cylindrical 'conning tower,' about ten feet high.
Linke went on. I was now alarmed by a call from my daughter, who had remained some distance back. The sound must have reached the two figures, for they rushed back to the object, clambered rapidly up the side of the 'conning tower,' and disappeared inside.
"The outer edge of the [REDACTED] that one appeared to be carrying a lamp on his chest. The lamp flashed on and off at regular intervals.
"The outer edge of the 'warming pan,' in which the holes were sunk now started to glow.
"The colour at first seemed green. Then changed to red.
"At same time I heard a slight hum. As the glow and the 'flowing' exhaust, the 'conning tower' was retracting into the centre of the 'warming pan,' and the whole object was rising from the ground.
"From the swirling effect of the glowing 'exhaust' I got the impression that the whole thing was spinning like a top.
"It seemed to be resting on the circular rim-piece, which had sunk through the centre of the object and was now protruding from the bottom and standing on the ground.
"The warming pan, with its glowing outside ring of flame, was now some feet off the earth.
"Then I noticed that the whole object was rising slowly from the earth. The cylinder on which it had rested had now disappeared inside the centre and reappeared again through the top.
"The rate of ascent now became much greater, and at the same time my daughter and I heard a whistling sound, rather like a jet-plane engine warming.
"The object rose in a horizontal position, swerved away towards a nearby village and disappeared, silent, at terrific speed, soon to be out of sight. As it left the ground the central tower rose again."

PAGE 179

other

A newspaper sports page from the Sunday Graphic dated July 6, 1952, featuring cricket match reports and scores.

ROBERTSON'S CRICKET ROUND-UP

EVEN the gasometers winked broadly and the bars buzzed with hilarious bowler-hatted gentlemen of South London as the mighty Yorkshire crashed with an unholy crash at the Oval.

Latecomers could not believe that the cocky, so-often omnipotent Yorkshire could be out for a meagre 137, and among them, their main England captain, Len Hutton.

The crowd of test match proportions—over 25,000 people crammed into the ground—were happy with the sunshine, the thirst it engendered, and Surrey's magnificent bowling achievement.

The toast over the tinkling glasses was the Bedser twins, who had celebrated their 34th birthday the previous day.

Test-match style

Brother Alec, in his fiercest days, will never lose match style, took five Yorkshire wickets for just over ten runs apiece, and the crowd, mostly men, who has come into his own as an opening batsman, scored 67 and is still there to worry the Yorkshire attack to-morrow.

Bedser—the far force at the close—could not in their wildest dreams have believed that they would be only three runs behind Yorkshire on the first innings in one hour and an hour, and the Oval wicket, though it needed watching, was never anything worth wickets.

Yorkshire have a job on to save this match but Yorkshire determination needs only such a captain's left-hander delivers all over the place.

In a memorable day for Surrey the captain, Stuart Surridge, deserves a meed of praise. He took three cheap wickets and the slip catch by which he dismissed Halliday was a "gem of purest ray serene." He held it one-handed and they low down.

Catch disallowed

Yorkshire left-handers, slow-bowler Wardle, and tall Wilson, saved the side from dire disgrace though Wilson, who scored 50 exactly, was lucky not to be out when seven.

Constable made a wonderful attempt to catch him with his hand on the ground. Wilson was walking to the pavilion until recalled. The umpire had disallowed the catch.

Was Denis Compton's hand-some form flushed and hot under the sunburn at Colchester as Essex ran to 402 for 8—and then declared—after he had put them in?

It was the biggest cricketing gaffe of the season for the pitch was never anything but docile. Young amateur Colin Griffith rubbed salt into the wounds by bowling with clouting the Middlesex [HANDWRITTEN: 62 HQ 83894 Section 6]

PAGE 180

memo

This memorandum details an inquiry from Fred Blumenthal (working for Drew Pearson) regarding Dr. W. A. Rhodes' claim that the FBI had borrowed and failed to return his photographs of flying discs from 1947. The document provides background on the 1947 investigation involving George Fugate, Jr. and the Phoenix FBI office.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Mr. Tolson
FROM : L. B. Nichols
SUBJECT: WILLIAM ALBERT RHODES
INFORMATION CONCERNING
FLYING DISCS
BUREAU FILE 62-83894, Serials 80, 184, and 225
DATE: June 4, 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: RA]
[HANDWRITTEN: 9-1]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

During my absence at 11:50 A.M. today, Fred Blumenthal, in the office of Drew Pearson, called and talked with Wick. Blumenthal stated Pearson has been in contact with Dr. W. A. Rhodes (Phoenix telephone number 5-0048) concerning photographs which the above captioned took of flying discs in the Phoenix area in July of 1947.

Blumenthal states that Dr. Rhodes told Pearson today that the FBI borrowed his negatives of the flying discs and when asked for their return the FBI told Rhodes the negatives were not available.

Blumenthal asked whether there is any truth to this statement of Rhodes and what the FBI knew about him.

It appears that Pearson is interested in using the photographs on his television program and is desirous of borrowing them from the Bureau or having them returned to Dr. Rhodes.

BACKGROUND:

Bureau files reflect that on August 29, 1947, a Mr. George Fugate, Jr., called at the Phoenix Office exhibiting credentials reflecting he represented A-2, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California. He asked an Agent to accompany him to interview William Rhodes who previously reported the photographing of a flying disc in Phoenix on the afternoon of July 7, 1947.

The Phoenix Office contacted SAC Harry Kimball of the San Francisco Office and Mr. Kimball verified the fact that Fugate came to Phoenix as a representative of Colonel Donald Springer of Hamilton Field, and it was suggested the Phoenix Office assist Fugate not in investigating [HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED], but in simply talking with Dr. Rhodes.

By letter dated September 4, 1947, the Phoenix Office set forth in four pages the results of this interview and stated Fugate had requested the negatives from Rhodes who did not have them in his immediate possession. Rhodes stated, however, he would deliver them to the FBI the following morning for transmittal to Fugate at Hamilton Field, California.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-282]
[HANDWRITTEN: 36]
[HANDWRITTEN: JUN 18 1952]
cc - Mr. Tolson
cc - Mr. Ladd
cc - Mr. Belmont
REW:md

PAGE 181

memo

A memorandum regarding William H. Mummler and information concerning flying discs, noting a meeting between Mr. Tolson and Mr. Belmont regarding FBI involvement with negatives.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

TO : Mr. Tolson
FROM : A. H. Belmont
SUBJECT: WILLIAM H. MUMMLER
INFORMATION CONCERNING
FLYING DISCS
BUREAU FILE 62-83894, Section 6, 181 and 228

Meeting at 11:20 A.M. today, Mr. Belmont
in the Office of Mr. Tolson and stated
that [REDACTED] (telephone number [REDACTED])
called and stated that he had been in contact
with [REDACTED] who mentioned that flying discs
were seen in July of 1947.

[REDACTED] states that Mr. [REDACTED] today
that the FBI borrowed the negatives of the
asked for their return and FBI told [REDACTED]
[ILLEGIBLE].

[REDACTED] asked whether the
statements of Rhodes and the FBI knew about

If [REDACTED] is interested in the
proceedings on the television program and to
them from the Bureau of their return.

[HANDWRITTEN: out cono - 7-1]

Bureau files reflect that on [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] called the Bureau of
[REDACTED] S-A [REDACTED] and
[REDACTED] stated that he had
returned William Mummler who reported the
[REDACTED] of the flying discs on the occasion of
[REDACTED].

PAGE 182

memo

This memorandum details the history of negatives provided by Mr. Rhodes to the FBI and subsequently transferred to Air Force Intelligence, as well as the FBI's communication with Mr. Blumenthal regarding the matter.

Memorandum to Mr. Tolson                                     June 4, 1952

On the morning of August 30, 1947, Rhodes delivered the
negatives to the Phoenix Office at which time they were accepted
with the understanding they were being given to Mr. Fugate, a
representative of the Army Air Force Intelligence, United States
Army, and that there was little, if any, chance of his getting the
negatives back. Mr. Rhodes turned the negatives over to the FBI
with the full understanding they were being given to the Air Force
and he would not get them back. (62-83894-80, page 4)

On April 17, 1950, Mr. Rhodes advised the Phoenix Office
that True Magazine would like to secure the photographs which he
had made available to Air Force Intelligence. At that time Rhodes
was referred to OSI, Fourth Air Force Base, San Francisco, Cali-
fornia, since they had been made available to this agency by the
Phoenix Office on August 30, 1947.

By letter dated June 8, 1949, the Phoenix Office advised
the Bureau that on the previous date Mr. Lynn C. Aldrich, OSI
representative, Phoenix, Arizona, called the Phoenix Office stating
he had been requested by his superiors in San Francisco to obtain
detailed information concerning the negatives since Rhodes had requested
their return. Aldrich pointed out that Fugate's recollection on the
matter was "hazy." OSI requested and was given with Bureau approval
a memorandum setting out essentially the information related above
concerning this matter.

ACTION TAKEN:

Mr. Blumenthal was advised by Wick that the FBI did not
have in its possession the negatives referred to by Mr. Rhodes and
in fact Rhodes knew full well the FBI turned them over to Air Force
Intelligence representatives, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field,
California, on August 30, 1947, with the understanding he might
never have them returned.

Blumenthal was advised the FBI did not investigate this
matter, did not investigate Rhodes, and had no interest whatsoever
in the matter other than to accompany the representative from
Hamilton Field while interviewing Rhodes. Blumenthal was told
that for these reasons, of course, we had no information concerning
the reliability of Rhodes.

Blumenthal was most appreciative for receiving this infor-
mation and said he would contact the office of Special Investi-
gations of the Air Force for what assistance they might be to him.
He said also he would straighten out Rhodes, informing him the FBI
only as a courtesy to the Air Force representatives received the
negatives from him and transmitted them.

[HANDWRITTEN: 6/11/52 Lt. Col. Bernard, OSI advised him.]
- 2 -

PAGE 183

memo

This memorandum discusses the status of photographs delivered by an individual named Rhodes to the Air Force Intelligence in 1951, noting that the Air Force claimed they were required for an investigation into a UFO report.

June 4, 1952
Memorandum to Mr. Tolson

On August 30, 1951, Rhodes delivered the
memorandum to the Office of the Air Force Intelligence
with the understanding they were being sent to Mr. [REDACTED].
Representatives of the Air Force Intelligence, United States
Army and Navy were present at the time of his getting the
memorandum. Mr. Rhodes turned over to the FBI
what he was understanding were being given to the Air Force
(65-58968-10).

On October 19, 1951, Rhodes advised the Special Agent in Charge
that he would like to secure the photographs which he
had turned over to the Air Force. This matter was
referred to the Air Force Intelligence, [REDACTED], and
Rhodes had been made available to the Air Force
Intelligence Office on August 30, 1951.

By letter dated June 2, 1952, the Special Agent in Charge
advised that the Air Force Intelligence, [REDACTED],
reported that the photographs were not available to
be returned as they had been requested by the Air Force
Intelligence in the course of their investigation of the
"UFO" report and was required. The Air Force
Intelligence advised that the information was needed concerning
[REDACTED].

[HANDWRITTEN: LIAISON]
[HANDWRITTEN: F.B.I.]
[HANDWRITTEN: S. DEPT OF JUSTICE]
[HANDWRITTEN: JUL 25 04 PM '52]

Air Force Intelligence advised that they did not
have the photographs in their possession. They referred
Rhodes to the Air Force Intelligence, [REDACTED],
United States Air Force, [REDACTED].

Rhodes did not investigate this
matter and did not investigate Rhodes. Neither
did he have any connection with the Air Force
Intelligence. Rhodes had no reason to believe
that he had any connection to the [REDACTED].

Rhodes did not have any connection to the
[REDACTED] and could not have been involved
in the matter. He had no connection to the
Air Force Intelligence, and he would also be
[REDACTED] in the [REDACTED] of the Air Force
Intelligence.

[HANDWRITTEN: F.B.I.]
[HANDWRITTEN: INTERNAL SECURITY SN]
[HANDWRITTEN: JUL 2 9 51 AM '52]

PAGE 184

memo

An FBI internal memo regarding an inquiry from Drew Pearson's office about photographs of flying discs taken by Dr. W. A. Rhodes in 1947, including background on the FBI's previous involvement with the negatives.

Mr. Tolson                                          June 4, 1952
L. B. Nichols
WILLIAM ALBERT RHODES
INFORMATION CONCERNING
FLYING DISCS
BUREAU FILE 62-83894, Serials 80, 184, and 225

During my absence at 11:50 A.M. today, Fred Blumenthal, in the office of Drew Pearson, called and talked with Wick. Blumenthal stated Pearson has been in contact with Dr. W. A. Rhodes (Phoenix telephone number 5-0048) concerning photographs which the above captioned took of flying discs in the Phoenix area in July of 1947.

Blumenthal states that Dr. Rhodes told Pearson today that the FBI borrowed his negatives of the flying discs and when asked for their return the FBI told Rhodes the negatives were not available.

Blumenthal asked whether there is any truth to this statement of Rhodes and what the FBI knew about him.

It appears that Pearson is interested in using the photographs on his television program and is desirous of borrowing them from the Bureau or having them returned to Dr. Rhodes.

BACKGROUND:

Bureau files reflect that on August 29, 1947, a Mr. George Fugate, Jr., called at the Phoenix Office exhibiting credentials reflecting he represented A-2, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California. He asked an Agent to accompany him to interview William Rhodes who previously reported the photographing of a flying disc in Phoenix on the afternoon of July 7, 1947.

The Phoenix Office contacted SAC Harry Kimball of the San Francisco Office and Mr. Kimball verified the fact that Fugate came to Phoenix as a representative of Colonel Donald Springer of Hamilton Field, and it was suggested the Phoenix Office assist Fugate not in investigating the matter, but in simply talking with Dr. Rhodes.

By letter dated September 4, 1947, the Phoenix Office set forth in four pages the results of this interview and stated Fugate had requested the negatives from Rhodes who did not have them in his immediate possession. Rhodes stated, however, he would deliver them to the FBI the following morning for transmittal to Fugate at Hamilton Field, California.

cc - Mr. Ladd
cc - Mr. Belmont
[HANDWRITTEN: R.W.C.]

PAGE 185

memo

This memorandum details the history of photographic negatives provided by Mr. Rhodes to the FBI and subsequently transferred to Air Force Intelligence in 1947, noting that the FBI did not investigate the matter.

Memorandum to Mr. Tolson June 4, 1952

On the morning of August 30, 1947, Rhodes delivered the negatives to the Phoenix Office at which time they were accepted with the understanding they were being given to Mr. Fugate, a representative of the Army Air Force Intelligence, United States Army, and that there was little, if any, chance of his getting the negatives back. Mr. Rhodes turned the negatives over to the FBI with the full understanding they were being given to the Air Force and he would not get them back. (62-83894-80, page 4)

On April 17, 1950, Mr. Rhodes advised the Phoenix Office that True Magazine would like to secure the photographs which he had made available to Air Force Intelligence. At that time Rhodes was referred to OSI, Fourth Air Force Base, San Francisco, California, since they had been made available to this agency by the Phoenix Office on August 30, 1947.

By letter dated June 8, 1949, the Phoenix Office advised the Bureau that on the previous date Mr. Lynn C. Aldrich, OSI representative, Phoenix, Arizona, called the Phoenix Office stating he had been requested by his superiors in San Francisco to obtain detailed information concerning the negatives since Rhodes had requested their return. Aldrich pointed out that Fugate's recollection on the matter was "hazy." OSI requested and was given with Bureau approval a memorandum setting out essentially the information related above concerning this matter.

ACTION TAKEN:

Mr. Blumenthal was advised by Wick that the FBI did not have in its possession the negatives referred to by Mr. Rhodes and in fact Rhodes knew full well the FBI turned them over to Air Force Intelligence representatives, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California, on August 30, 1947, with the understanding he might never have them returned.

Blumenthal was advised the FBI did not investigate this matter, did not investigate Rhodes, and had no interest whatsoever in the matter other than to accompany the representative from Hamilton Field while interviewing Rhodes. Blumenthal was told that for these reasons, of course, we had no information concerning the reliability of Rhodes.

Blumenthal was most appreciative for receiving this information and said he would contact the office of Special Investigations of the Air Force for what assistance they might be to him. He said also he would straighten out Rhodes, informing him the FBI only as a courtesy to the Air Force representatives received the negatives from him and transmitted them.

- 2 -

PAGE 186

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mr. Thad W. Culmer II, informing him that his inquiry does not fall under FBI jurisdiction and has been referred to the Secretary of the Air Force.

July 15, 1952

Mr. Thad W. Culmer II
Post Office Box 99
Robinson, Illinois
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83874-28]
Dear Mr. Culmer:

Your letter of July 8, 1952, has been received.

While I would like to be of service, the subject matter of your communication does not relate to an activity within the investigative jurisdiction of the FBI. I have, however, taken the liberty of referring a copy of your letter to The Honorable, The Secretary of the Air Force, Department of Defense
Building, The Pentagon, Washington 25, D. C., who may be able to be of assistance.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

Copy of incoming to Secretary of the Air Force by form letter.

[HANDWRITTEN: 319]
[HANDWRITTEN: 53 AUG 1 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 91]
[HANDWRITTEN: TEB:pa]
[HANDWRITTEN: TEB]

PAGE 187

other

This page contains administrative stamps and handwritten notes indicating the receipt and processing of a document by the FBI Mail Room in July 1957.

RECORDED 81

[ILLEGIBLE] of records to [ILLEGIBLE] of the FBI

RECEIVED MAIL ROOM
F B I
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
JUL 16 3 58 PM '57

[HANDWRITTEN: 23 JUL 1957]
[HANDWRITTEN: JUL 1957]
[HANDWRITTEN: MAILED 18]

PAGE 188

letter

A letter from Thad W. Culmer II to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover inquiring about information regarding 'flying saucers' and expressing skepticism about official explanations for sightings.

July 8, 1952

Thad W. Culmer II
Post Office Box 99
Robinson, Illinois

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, District of Columbia

Dear Mr. Hoover:

Perhaps this is a little out of your line of endeavor, however, I feel that perhaps you or your organization might be able to give me some information concerning the following matter.

From the first time it was written up in the press I have been keenly interested in strange celestial phenomena such as the flying disks popularly called "flying saucers."

Now out of all the thousands of people who have reported sightings not all of them have had too much to drink, nor could they have been victims of optical illusions, retinal retention, or hallucinations. Some of the objects sighted could not have been jet craft, guided missiles, or rockets, neither could they all have been weather instruments. Unretouched and undoctored photographs have given evidence that someone must have seen something.

It seems that both civil and military authorities are most willing to proclaim what the objects are not. I feel there is more to the matter than meets the eye. My decision to write you was based on the thought I would get straight answers.

Do you have any ideas or data on this subject? What are your opinions? If not, where might I write for such information? Any kindness, consideration, or information which you can extend toward me concerning this matter will certainly be most sincerely appreciated.

Very truly yours,
Thad W. Culmer II

[HANDWRITTEN: Mr. Tolson, Mr. Ladd, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Belmont, Mr. Clegg, Mr. Glavin, Mr. Harbo, Mr. Rosen, Mr. Tracy, Mr. Laughlin, Mr. Mohr, Tele. Room, Mr. Holloman, Miss Gandy]
[HANDWRITTEN: Nml ack 7/15/52 JEB]
[HANDWRITTEN: es]
[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-283]
[HANDWRITTEN: JUL 24 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-164]

PAGE 189

cover-page

This page is a blank cover sheet containing multiple FBI date-received stamps from July 1952.

RECEIVED-NICHOLS
F.B.I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
JUL 31 11 37 AM '52

RECEIVED-LAD
F.B.I.
S. DEPT. OF JUSTIC
JUL 10 2 40 PM '52

MR. JONES
RECEIVED
F.B.I.
S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
JUL 10 5 28 PM '52

RECEIVED-NICHOLS
F.B.I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
JUL 10 3 35 PM '52
[HANDWRITTEN: JUL 7 1952]

PAGE 190

memo

This FBI memorandum documents a request from the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) for the FBI to immediately report any incoming information regarding 'Flying Saucer' sightings to Captain William Deegan's office.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: July 29, 1952
FROM : SAC, WASHINGTON FIELD 62-0
SUBJECT: AERIAL OBJECTS
"FLYING SAUCERS"
INFORMATION CONCERNING

[HANDWRITTEN: G. I. R. 1-2]
[HANDWRITTEN: Kept L. M. P. Photostat]

On July 28, 1952, at the Weekly Intelligence Conference, Captain WILLIAM DEEGAN, Office of Special Investigations, 4th Air Force Base, Bolling Field, advised the representative of the FBI, Washington Field Office, over the prior weekend, his office had received reports concerning the observation of aerial objects. Captain DEEGAN referred to a phone call made to his office by Special Agent LEONARD E. WEBSTER of the Washington Field Office, furnishing to OSI the identity of a woman who reportedly had observed an aerial object. DEEGAN praised the WFO for the expeditious notification of this instance.

Captain DEEGAN, Colonel COLLINS, DEEGAN's superior office, and Special Agent JOHN M. DEBETTENCOURT, in a conference on July 28, 1952, discussed the matter of immediate notification of OSI. This conference resulted in the request by Colonel COLLINS and Captain DEEGAN that in the event, whenever information is received by the FBI, in which it is alleged that someone has observed a "Flying Saucer", this information be immediately relayed to Captain DEEGAN's office. It is to be noted that this office may be reached by dialing Code 1261 and asking for Extension 509. Captain DEEGAN said this number should be called under these circumstances at any time, day or night.

Captain DEEGAN stated that the Air Force is greatly concerned about this matter of aerial objects and said that the Air Force Intelligence would appreciate the execution of the requested procedure, mentioned above. It is suggested that the Bureau bring this matter to the attention of its night supervisors, since these night supervisors also receive complaints from persons outside of the Bureau and may receive information concerning the observation of aerial objects.

JMD:NPB
[HANDWRITTEN: Martin orally advised 8/6/52 WAKS]
[HANDWRITTEN: Memo for notes 8/15/52 CO EHM]
RECORDED - 59 62-73894-284
JUL 31 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: Let Bureau bullet typed 8-28-52 EHM/dry]
SEP 24 1952
SEP 15 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: EX 69]
[HANDWRITTEN: UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN 62-85357]

PAGE 191

memo

This memo documents a request from Captain [REDACTED] of the Air Force to the FBI to establish a procedure for immediate notification regarding reports of 'flying saucers' observed in the Washington area.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI DATE: July 29, 1952
FROM: SAC, WASHINGTON FIELD
SUBJECT: FLYING DISCS
INFORMATION CONCERNING

On July 29, 1952, at the Weekly Intelligence Conference, Captain [REDACTED] advised the representatives of the FBI that certain reports concerning the observation of aerial objects Washington Field Office, over the past weeks, had been received by his office. A phone call made to him by Special Agent [REDACTED] of the Washington Field Office, furnishing to FBI the identity of a woman who reported receiving an aerial object, raised the UFO for the attention of [REDACTED] in this instance.

Captain [REDACTED] requested a conference concerning [REDACTED].

In a conference with Mr. JOHN [REDACTED], Special Agent, the matter of immediate notification of FBI was discussed. Captain [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] requested that in the event any information is received by the FBI in which it is alleged that someone has observed a "flying saucer", this information be immediately relayed to Captain [REDACTED] office. It is to be noted that this office may be dialed by dialing [REDACTED] and asking for Extension [REDACTED]. Captain [REDACTED] should be called under these circumstances at the time of day or night.

Captain [REDACTED] stated that the Air Force is merely concerned about this matter of aerial objects and that the Air Force would appreciate the execution of requested procedures mentioned above. It is suggested that the Bureau bring this matter to the attention of the night supervisors since these reports are also received from persons outside of the [REDACTED] regarding the observation of [REDACTED].

PAGE 192

memo

An FBI memorandum detailing a report from Dr. R. E. McINDOO regarding a sighting of bombing planes and unidentified objects over Thessalon Lake, Ontario, on July 27, 1952.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Director, FBI DATE: July 31, 1952
FROM : SAC, Indianapolis (62-0)
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS SEEN NEAR THESSALON LAKE,
ONTARIO, CANADA, JULY 27, 1952
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

[HANDWRITTEN: GDK] [HANDWRITTEN: emp]

Dr. R. E. McINDOO, 820 West Walnut Street, Kokomo, Indiana, on July 30, 1952 advised Special Agent JOHN F. GERDIS that on July 27, 1952 at approximately 10:00 A.M. while fishing in the back waters of Thessalon Lake, Ontario, Canada, he noticed a formation of bombing planes, sixteen to twenty in number, in two groups flying south at a height estimated by him to be four or five miles.

Dr. McINDOO stated that the planes went over the lake, suddenly dropped objects at first thought by him to be parachutes. He continued that these objects fell straight down for a short time, then suddenly spurted vapor and at a high rate of speed flew off in a southwesterly direction.

Dr. McINDOO was unable to identify the nationality of the planes, but stated that they had twin trails of bluish smoke. He further stated that the objects which had been dropped from the planes had a single trail of bluish smoke.

He stated that he had been accompanied on his fishing trip by PAUL GADDIS, Kokomo, Indiana. Dr. McINDOO had no further information concerning instant planes or the objects dropped by them.

Dr. McINDOO was referred to the FBI by DONALD D. SMITH, President of the First National Bank of Kokomo, Indiana, who advised that Dr. McINDOO enjoyed a good reputation in Kokomo.

UACB, no further action will be taken in this matter. The above is being forwarded for the information of the Bureau in the event they desire to communicate this information to the Air Force.

[HANDWRITTEN: Let to OSI 8/11/52 EAB: med] RECORDED - 45 [HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-285] INDEXED - 45 AUG 4 1952
HSK:bjk
AIR MAIL SPECIAL DELIVERY [HANDWRITTEN: EX - 28]

PAGE 193

memo

A memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police regarding a report from Dr. R. E. McIndoo about sighting a formation of planes and falling objects near Thessalon Lake, Ontario, on July 27, 1952.

62-83894 [HANDWRITTEN: 285]
RECORDED-30
EX. - 69
REGISTERED AIR MAIL

Date: August 11, 1952
To: Mr. Glenn H. Bethel
c/o The Commissioner
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

From: John Edgar Hoover - Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Subject: FLYING SAUCERS SEEN NEAR THESSALON LAKE,
ONTARIO, CANADA, JULY 27, 1952
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

Dr. R. E. McIndoo, 820 West Walnut Street, Kokomo,
Indiana, on July 30, 1952, advised that on July 27, 1952,
at approximately 10:00 A.M. while fishing in the back
waters of Thessalon Lake, Ontario, Canada, he noticed a
formation of bombing planes, sixteen to twenty in number,
in two groups flying south at a height estimated by him to
be four or five miles.

Dr. McIndoo stated that the planes went over the
lake and suddenly dropped objects, at first thought by him
to be parachutes. He continued that these objects fell
straight for a short time, then suddenly spurted vapor
and at a high rate of speed flew off in a southwesterly
direction.

Dr. McIndoo was unable to identify the nationality
of the planes, but stated that they had twin trails of bluish
smoke. He further stated that the objects which had been
dropped from the planes had single trails of bluish smoke.

EAB:mes [HANDWRITTEN: mes]
cc - Foreign Service Desk [HANDWRITTEN: VPI]
68 AUG 13 1952 OMM - FBI
AUG 11 1952
MAILED 30

PAGE 194

other

This page is a mostly blank document containing only a record stamp and a date-received stamp from the FBI Mail Room.

RECORDED-30

RECEIVED-MAIL ROOM
FBI
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Aug 11 6 10 PM '52

PAGE 195

PAGE 196

PAGE 197

PAGE 198

PAGE 199

memo

This page contains a brief observation regarding the difficulty of approaching unidentified objects with jet aircraft and states that no recommendation is provided.

obtain a better view of these objects. However, recent attempts in this regard have indicated that when the pilot in the jet approaches the object it invariably fades from view.

RECOMMENDATION:

None. The foregoing is for your information.

- 3 -

PAGE 200

memo

An FBI memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Air Force regarding a letter received from Florence Whitish about flying saucers, stating that no investigation will be conducted by the FBI.

62-83894
RECORDED - 122
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-287]
Date: August 8, 1952
EX-129
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.
From: John Edgar Hoover - Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Subject: AERIAL OBJECTS;
"FLYING SAUCERS"
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

There are attached two copies of a letter dated
August 1, 1952, from Florence Whitish, Post Office Box 526,
Charleston, South Carolina, regarding "Flying Saucers."

Miss Whitish's communication has been acknowledged
and she has been informed of this referral.

No investigation is contemplated with regard to this
matter.

Attachment

KWD:mes
[HANDWRITTEN: mes]
APPROPRIATE AGENCIES
AND FIELD OFFICES
ADVISED BY ROUTING
SLIP(S) OF [HANDWRITTEN: 2040 8/31/77 9/1/77]
[HANDWRITTEN: (signature)]
[HANDWRITTEN: (signature)]
[HANDWRITTEN: WAB 78]
[HANDWRITTEN: (signature)]
[HANDWRITTEN: 66 AUG 14 1952]

PAGE 201

PAGE 202

letter

A handwritten letter from Florence Whitish to J. Edgar Hoover expressing her personal opinion on the origin of flying saucers, suggesting they may be related to television rays.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894] [HANDWRITTEN: 8/1/52]
P.O. Box 524,
Charleston,
S.C.
J. Edgar Hoover
Would like to express
my opinion on the flying
saucers, and guess it will
be as good as some I've
read. [HANDWRITTEN: OF FLYING SAUCERS]
I can't remember of hearing
any thing about them
until television come
into existence
I wondered if the rays [HANDWRITTEN: li]
could be strong enough
to give off a bright
object looking apparition
No, special reason for
sending you my idea
just could'nt think of any
one else to send it to.
Sincerely
Florence Whitish
[HANDWRITTEN: Let ack. Let to Savanna cc. incoming 8/1/52 KWB:med]
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-28]
[HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED-50]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED-50]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-27]
[HANDWRITTEN: AUG 4 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: Florence Whitish]

PAGE 203

other

This page contains a date stamp and receipt information from the U.S. Department of Justice.

AUG 6 3 49 PM '51
REC'D ESPIONAGE
B
U S DEP OF JUSTICE

PAGE 204

memo

An FBI memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Director of Special Investigations at the Air Force, forwarding a letter from Mrs. Ora A. Tygrett regarding flying saucers.

Date: August 12, 1952
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington, D. C.
From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Subject: FLYING SAUCERS

Attached are two copies of a letter from
Mrs. Ora A. Tygrett dated July 31, 1952, addressed to
the War Department, c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation,
the contents of which are self-explanatory.

Mrs. Tygrett's letter has been acknowledged
and she has been advised of this referral.

Enclosure

Note On Yellow Only:

Previous material concerning flying saucers
furnished OSI. (62-83894)

[HANDWRITTEN: CONFIDENTIAL Declassified 2040 8/31/77 HM mb]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-288]
[HANDWRITTEN: APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND FIELD OFFICES ADVISED BY ROUTING SLIP(S) OF 2040 DATE 9/1/77]
[HANDWRITTEN: 313]
[HANDWRITTEN: 66 AUG 15 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: MAILED 14 AUG 12 1952 FBI]

PAGE 205

memo

A brief memo from the Washington Field office to the FBI Director regarding Unidentified Flying Objects, dated August 18, 1955.

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] 8/18/55]

August 18, 1955

Director, FBI
SAC, Washington Field

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
INFORMATION CONCERNING

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]

RECEIVE MAIL ROOM
F B I
U.S DEPT OF JUSTICE
AUG 12 5 28 PM '55

PAGE 206

letter

A handwritten letter from a resident of New Palestine, Indiana, to the FBI expressing a personal theory that 'flying saucers' are films from a secret camera operated by something like television.

[HANDWRITTEN: R#1.]
New Palestine Indiana
July 31/52
[HANDWRITTEN: 65-83894]
To Federal Bureau of Investigation
The War Dept
Washington D.C.
[HANDWRITTEN: AWK]
[HANDWRITTEN: any] Gentlemen: [HANDWRITTEN: FLYING SAUCERS]
Since reading & hearing
over Radio about the
"flying saucers";
I am compelled to write
to you.
[HANDWRITTEN: MRS. ASA A. TYRATT]
[HANDWRITTEN: MRS. ASA A. TYRATT]
[HANDWRITTEN: EAM]
[HANDWRITTEN: Moseburg]
I am a strong believer in
our almighty God & Christ
I have had.
I feel that these saucers are
films from a secret camera
operated by something like
T.V. I do believe [ILLEGIBLE]

PAGE 207

other

This page is a blank sheet containing only FBI date stamps indicating receipt of the document.

AUG 14 9 23 AM '52
REC'D ESPIONAGE
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED
AUG 7 | 22 PM '52
INTERNAL SECURITY SN
F B I
U S DEPT OF JUSTICE

PAGE 208

other

A handwritten note speculating that unidentified flying objects are operating through the Communist Party in the United States and possess the ability to become invisible.

They are operating through the Communist Party right here in the or our United States. By radar Every Group of saucers has a picture, the best picture are kept for bombing purposes. Why we see them just once & a while; They dont want the U.S. to Catch on. To my opinion they have a way of causing them to be invisible.

PAGE 209

letter

A handwritten letter from Mrs. Asa A. Tyggett speculating on the origin of unidentified aerial objects, suggesting they could be from enemy planes or cameras operated from tall buildings, and requesting confidentiality.

3
They can lower them or send them high; When high they are invisible;
It could be from an enemie plaine or from a tall building in the United States
It could be the camera is carried in to cities and operated from tall building the ones that some one seen with a tail of fire is the picture that is kept.
So let's be on the look out for the next one and follow their path.
Please keep my name confedently.
Mrs. Asa A. Tyggett.
(over)

PAGE 210

other

A handwritten note referencing unidentified objects over Washington D.C. and religious advice regarding secrecy.

[HANDWRITTEN: DS, When they were over Washington D.C. it could a been from the tallest building there. You might start from the first place they were ever seen. Trace back you might find the secret place. And pray with out sceaing "And have faith". Our good Bood. says do not let our secrets be known, when praying & trusting in God, pray secretly into him.]

PAGE 211

letter

A letter from Mrs. Ora A. Tygrett to the FBI expressing her belief that 'flying saucers' are secret camera projections operated by the Communist Party for the purpose of bombing.

TRUE COPY

R #.1,
New Palestine Indiana
July 31,/52

c/o Federal Beaura of Investigation
The War Dept
Washington D.C.

Gentlemen:

Since reading & hearing over Radio about the "flying
saucers," I am compelled to Write to you -

I am a strong believer in our almight God & Christ our Lord.
I have the faith Daniel had.

I feal that these Saucers are films from a secret Camera operated
by something like T.V. I do believe, They are operating through
the Comuniest Party right here in the, or our Unitid States, by
radar Evey Group of Saucers has a picture, the best picture
are kept for bombing purposes.

Why"we see them just once & a while; They dont want the U.S. to
catch on. To my opinion they have a way of causing them to be
invisible.

They can Lower them or send them high; When high they are
invisible; It could be from an enemie plaine, or from a tall
building in the United States. It could be the Camera is
carried, in to cities and operated from tall buildings the
ones that some one seen with a tail of fire is the picture that
is Kept;

So lets be on the look out for the next one and follow their path.
Please Keep my Name confidently.
/s/ Mrs. Ora A. Tygrett

P.S.
When they were over Washington D.C. it could a been from the
Tallest building there. You might Start from the first place they
were ever seen - trace back you might find the secret place.

And pray with out sceasing "And have faith" Our good Bood - says
do not let our seerets be known, when praying & trusting in God
pray secretly into him.

PAGE 212

memo

An FBI memorandum regarding a report from Harry H. Winchester of Jersey Shore, PA, who claimed to have seen seven unusual flashes in the sky during an electrical storm on July 28, 1952.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : A. H. Belmont [HANDWRITTEN: the] DATE: July 31, 1952
FROM : J. R. Higgins
SUBJECT: UNUSUAL FLASHES DURING
ELECTRICAL STORM, JERSEY SHORE, PA.,
JULY 28, 1952
HARRY H. WINCHESTER, COMPLAINANT
[HANDWRITTEN: Flying Saucers]
[HANDWRITTEN: W. A. W. C.]
At 2:15 AM on July 31, 1952, Harry H. Winchester, 315 Cemetery Street, Jersey Shore, Pa., telephonically advised that in the early morning of 7-28-52, during a severe electrical storm in the area of his residence, he had observed seven unusual flashes in the sky, each flash being accompanied by a loud report.
Complainant, who appeared to be under the influence of intoxicants, called as a result of recent newspaper stories regarding phenomena allegedly observed during past week in this country.
Bureau indices contain no information identifiable with the complainant.
Action:
File.
JRH:dmd [HANDWRITTEN: dmd]
RECORDED - 34
EX - 6
INDEXED - 34
[HANDWRITTEN: 162-83894-289]
JUL 31 1952
65 AUG 7 1952 [HANDWRITTEN: 76]

PAGE 213

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mr. Benedicto Romero informing him that his inquiry is outside the FBI's jurisdiction and has been forwarded to the Department of the Air Force.

August 13, 1952

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-270]
RECORDED - 36
EX-25
Mr. Benedicto Romero
1647 Park Avenue
New York City

Dear Mr. Romero:

I have received your letter of
July 31, 1952. The matter referred to in your
letter is not within the jurisdiction of this
Bureau and I have taken the liberty of forwarding
a copy of your letter to the Department of the
Air Force for appropriate action.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

EHM:kc
cc - 1 - New York (Attachment)

NOTE:
Bureau files fail to reflect any information
that can be identified with Mr. Romero.

PAGE 214

PAGE 215

form

This is an FBI search slip form for an individual named Benedicto Romero, marked with 'NR' (No Record).

[REDACTED] ICE UNIT 4-22a
SEARCH SLIP
Supervisor [HANDWRITTEN: Mossing] Room [HANDWRITTEN: 3708]
Subj: [HANDWRITTEN: Benedicto Romero]

Exact Spelling Searcher [HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
All References Initial [HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
Subversive Ref. Date [HANDWRITTEN: 8/12]
Main File
Restricted to Locality of

FILE NUMBER SERIALS
[HANDWRITTEN: NR]

[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
Initialed

PAGE 216

other

A page containing only a handwritten note.

[HANDWRITTEN: File for file]

PAGE 217

letter

A handwritten letter from Benedicto Romero to the Department of Investigations in Washington D.C. regarding the mystery of 'Flying Plates' (UFOs), dated July 31, 1952.

4.
about some others things
I talk in the same letter.
Ja!!! Ja!!! Ja!!!
I have to laugh because
I know that the peace comes
very soon after I explain
this mystery to my lovely
government of the United
States of America.
Nobody can explain the
mystery of the "Flying Plates"
in a sincerely truth before
me. Just make a try with
the scientific people; and
after call for me.
Sincerely with all my
Benedicto Romero
47 Park ave N.Y.
City

[HANDWRITTEN: RA.]
Flying Saucers
New York City
July 31/52
Department of Investiga-
tions
Washington D.C.

Dear sirs:
[HANDWRITTEN: Benedicto Romero B]
Am sorry hearing
and reading too much
noice about the mistery
of they "Flying Plates"
RECORDED - 94 162 83894-290
INEDXED [HANDWRITTEN: AUG 5 1952] [ILLEGIBLE] [HANDWRITTEN: 8-13-52 Lesto Romero C/W OST- EHNKE]
said EX-31 bout of [ILLEGIBLE]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECEIVED FBI INTERNAL AUG 11 2 48 PM 52]

PAGE 218

letter

A handwritten letter expressing amusement regarding the government's inability to capture images of 'flying plates' and referencing a previously refused letter sent to the United Nations.

3. 
and may excuse me again 
because I laugh of this. 
Mistery that put in 
troubles my goverment. 
Just I was waiting for 
this to write to you again 
Now you are in the line 
because you don't know 
what hapen. 
The letter that you 
"reffused" from Wpeshington 
to me; was sended again 
to the Organization of 
the United Nations 
at the New York State. 
So if you like to know 
about the "flying plates" 
look for that letter that 
should be there. And also 

2. 
goverment of U.S. is going 
to catch a picture of the 
Misteriously 
"Flying Plates" 
by the radar detectors. 
I say impossible !!!! ??? 
Ja !!! Ja!!! You please 
and excuse me, for my 
laughing. 
If you would hear me 
when I wrote to you about 
sixth months before. Now 
you would not be in 
troubles with what 
hapens in the atmosphere 
Ja!!! Ja!!! Ja!!! 
I say if you please

PAGE 219

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mrs. Fred Haufe acknowledging receipt of her letter and informing her that the matter has been referred to the Department of the Air Force as it falls outside FBI jurisdiction.

RECORDED-29

August 14, 1952

62-83894-291

Mrs. Fred Haufe
606 Walnut Avenue
Fairmont, West Virginia

Dear Mrs. Haufe:

I have received your letter of August 1, 1952, and want to thank you for making the information contained therein available to this Bureau.

The matter referred to in your letter is not within the jurisdiction of this Bureau and I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your letter to the Department of the Air Force for appropriate action.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

EHM:kc
cc - 1 - Pittsburgh (Attachment)

NOTE:
Bureau files fail to reflect any information that can be identified with Mrs. Haufe.

[HANDWRITTEN: initials and signatures]

PAGE 220

other

This page consists entirely of various FBI date and office receipt stamps.

REGIO-TAI SEN'S OFFICE
AUG 13 5 37 PM '52
F. B. I.
U.S DEPT OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED-LA
F. B. I.
DEPT OF JUST
AUG 13 12 46 PM '52

AUG 14 5 15 AM '52
U.S DEPT OF JUSTICE

RECEIVED
F. B. I.
MAIL ROOM
AUG 13 9 26 AM '52

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
JUSTICE

RECEIVED-LA
F. B. I.
DEPT OF JUST
AUG 13 5 09 PM '52

PAGE 221

letter

A letter from Mrs. Fred Haufe to J. Edgar Hoover expressing concern about 'Flying Saucers' and suggesting that publicizing sighting locations is unwise as it may aid enemies.

606 WALNUT AVENUE
FAIRMONT, W. VA.
PHONE 3765

August 1, 1952

Hon. J. Edgar Hoover
Dept. F.B.I.
Washington, D.C.

Dear Sir:

I have been hearing so much about the objects called Flying Saucers that I begin to speculate as to whether we are the only Nation or county to witness such a display.

Of course it could be that those odd objects are pest filled Radar controlled waiting to be punctured. We have been so accused by another Nation that no doubt they have devised some diabolical plan to test on us.

I am not inclined to pass those over lightly, because I believe that those gadgets can be made and controlled to the extent of great numbers in groupings.

Also, I believe it is very unwise to make public the locations of sightings as many folk are prone to worry, and a state of mind like this is exactly what our enemy is seeking.

Any one wise enuf to perfect such would not only know their travel distance but also their location, therefore no talk or publications could benefit us in that.

I hope that someone has had the integrity and foresight to learn where if in any other country these 'things' have been seen.

Thanking you in advance for the courtesy of a reply, I remain

Respectfully yours,
[HANDWRITTEN: Mrs. Fred Haufe]

[HANDWRITTEN: 8-13-52
Let to Mrs. Haufe
Let to OSI
EHM:kc]

[HANDWRITTEN: EX. 69 RECORDED 62-83894-291]
[HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED 36]
[HANDWRITTEN: AUG 5 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: FIVE]

PAGE 222

letter

A letter addressed to J. Edgar Hoover requesting information on whether certain reports (implied to be UFO-related) are being investigated by the FBI.

Hon. J. Edgar Hoover
F.B.I.
Washington, D.C.

Dear Sir:

I have been so much concerned about the reports I have received that I am writing to you in the hope that you might be able to tell me whether or not such reports are being investigated.

Of course it could be that these reports are just the product of over-active imaginations, but I am writing to you because I feel that if there is any truth to them, they should be investigated by your office.

I have not been able to find out if these reports are true, but I believe that they can be checked and controlled to some extent.

I feel it is very unfair to the public to have these reports circulating without any official statement as to their truth or falsity.

I am not asking for any information that would be a violation of your security regulations, but I would like to know if these reports are being investigated or if there is any other reason why they are not being investigated.

[HANDWRITTEN: 14]

PAGE 223

memo

An FBI memorandum from the Cincinnati SAC to the Director regarding an anonymous letter written in German about flying saucers, which was received by the Cincinnati Enquirer.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Director, FBI DATE: August 6, 1952
FROM : SAC, Cincinnati (100-0) [HANDWRITTEN: cut]
SUBJECT: ANONYMOUS COMMUNICATION WRITTEN
IN GERMAN LANGUAGE RECEIVED BY
"CINCINNATI ENQUIRER" PERTAINING
TO "FLYING SAUCERS"
SECURITY MATTER - X

Mr. K. DORIS of the staff of the "Cincinnati Enquirer" furnished [HANDWRITTEN: P] the Cincinnati Office with the enclosed letter and envelope received anonymously at the "Cincinnati Enquirer" in an envelope postmarked 7-3-52 at Cincinnati, Ohio.

It will be noted that the enclosed letter is written in the German language, and I am also enclosing a rather loose translation of the letter as furnished by the "Cincinnati Enquirer."

In view of the widespread interest in so-called "flying saucers," [HANDWRITTEN: RJ] I am forwarding this material to the Bureau, with the thought in mind that the Bureau may desire to have a careful translation made of the attached letter, and the results, if deemed advisable, made available to other Governmental agencies.

Enclosures (3)

EWY:LM

ENCLO. ATTACHED
[HANDWRITTEN: Memo with attachment of transl. 8/8/52] RECORDED - 78 162-83894-29
12 AUG 7 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: COPY AND SPECIMENS RETAINED IN LAB. FOR LAB. ACTION AND REPORT T-13861 8/8/52] [HANDWRITTEN: 8-13-52 Let to OSI EHM:ke]

PAGE 224

memo

A memorandum from the Cincinnati FBI office to the Director regarding an anonymous letter written in German received by the Cincinnati Enquirer concerning 'flying saucers'.

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO: Director, FBI DATE: August 6, 1952
FROM: SAC, Cincinnati (62-0)
SUBJECT: ANONYMOUS COMMUNICATION WRITTEN
IN GERMAN LANGUAGE RECEIVED BY
"CINCINNATI ENQUIRER"
RE: "FLYING SAUCERS"
SECURITY MATTER - X

M. R. DORS of the "Cincinnati Enquirer" furnished
the Cincinnati office with the enclosed letter and envelope received
anonymously at the "Cincinnati Enquirer" at Cincinnati, O., 7-25-52.

It will be noted that the enclosed letter is written in the German
language, and I am also enclosing a loose translation of the letter
as furnished by the "Cincinnati Enquirer".

In view of the widespread interest in so-called "flying saucers",
I am forwarding this material to the Bureau with the thought in mind that
the Bureau may have a Bureau translation of the attached letter and the results,
if deemed advisable, made available to other governmental agencies.

Enclosures (3)

MY: YWH

LABORATORY DIVISION
F B I
Aug 8 10 57 AM '52

RECEIVED-HARBO

[HANDWRITTEN: 52]

U S DEPT OF JUSTICE
F B I
TECHNICAL
Aug 8 10 11 AM '52

U S DEPT OF JUSTICE
F B I
TECHNICAL
AUG 27 5 23 PM '52

RECEIVED

PAGE 225

memo

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover forwards a German-language anonymous letter received by the Cincinnati Enquirer regarding 'flying saucers' to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

RECORDED-29 [HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-292]
EX-129 Date: August 13, 1952
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.

From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Subject: ANONYMOUS COMMUNICATION WRITTEN
IN THE GERMAN LANGUAGE, RECEIVED
BY THE "CINCINNATI ENQUIRER"
PERTAINING TO "FLYING SAUCERS"
SECURITY MATTER - X

There is attached for your information
and any action you desire to take in this matter
a Photostat of a letter, written in German, received
from an anonymous source, which was addressed to the
"Cincinnati Enquirer." A Photostat of the envelope,
in which the letter was forwarded, is attached and
indicates it was mailed on July 31, 1952, at
Cincinnati, Ohio.

For your further assistance in this matter
a translation of the attached letter from the German
is attached.

Attachment

EHM:kc
[HANDWRITTEN: DECLASSIFIED BY 1259 ON 10-28-78 550160]
[HANDWRITTEN: APPROPRIATE AGENCIES 10/3/78]

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

PAGE 226

cover-page

This is a cover page for an enclosure, marked with a case file number.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-292] ENCLOSURE

PAGE 227

letter

A handwritten German document describing a 'flying saucer' (Fliegende Untertasse) as a V-weapon (V-7) developed since 1944, featuring a disc-shaped body, remote control, and a 30,000-35,000 km range.

Fliegende Untertasse.
Seit 1944- ausprobierte Waffe welche jetzt wohl schon serienmässig hergestellt wird und zur Zeit viel von sich reden macht ist eine V. Waffe, welche einen Diskus ähnlichen Körper hat, der im Durchmesser etwa 42.50 m Durchmesser hat, hat am Aussenring etwa 45-50 automatische Heindüsen, die nach Zündung der Scheibe, um eine im Zentrum befindliche plexiglas Kugel kreisen, in der befinden sich die Mess und Kontrollgeräte für Fernsteuerung befinden. In der Kugel ist nach genug Raum für hoch explosive Atombomben, diese Waffe befindet sich in [REDACTED] Hand und kann einen Aktionsradius von 30-35000 km aufweisen, V. waffen Konstrukteur Riedel Deutschland sagt es ist eine typische V 7 daran er selbst gearbeitet hat. Ich bin sicher das die Wahrheit besser ist als eine Panik unter Volk bei Nichtwissenheit. H. ScH.

PAGE 228

report

A handwritten German document describing a 'flying saucer' (Fliegende Untertasse) weapon, allegedly a V-7 type developed since 1944, featuring a disk-shaped body, remote control, and a 30,000-35,000 km range.

Fliegende Untertasse.
Seit 1944- ausprobierte Waffe welche jetzt wohl schon serienmässig hergestellt wird und zur Zeit viel von sich reden macht ist eine V. Waffe, welche einen Diskus ähnlichen Körper hat, der im Durchmesser etwa 42.50 m Durchmesser hat, hat am Aussenring etwa 45-50 automatische Heisdüsen, die nach Mündung der Scheibe, um eine im Zentrum befindliche [ILLEGIBLE] glaskugel kreisen, in der befinden sich die diese mit Kontrollgeräte für Fernsteuerung befinden. In der Kugel ist nach genug Raum für hoch explosive Atombomben, diese Waffe befindet sich in [REDACTED] Hand und kann einen Aktionsradius von 30-35000 km aufweisen, V. waffen Konstrukteur [HANDWRITTEN: Riedel] Deutschland sagt es ist eine Typische V 7 daran er selbst gearbeitet hat.
Ich bin sicher das die Wahrheit besser ist als eine Panik unter Volk bei Nichtwissenheit. H.Sch.

PAGE 229

letter

A handwritten German document describing a 'flying saucer' (Fliegende Untertasse) weapon, claiming it is a V-weapon developed since 1944, currently in Russian hands, with a 30,000-35,000 km range, and mentioning a designer named Riedel.

Fliegende Untertasse.
Seit 1944- ausprobierte Waffe welche jetzt wohl schon serienmässig hergestellt wird und zur Zeit viel von sich reden macht ist eine V. Waffe, welche einen Diskus ähnlichen Körper hat, der im Durchmesser etwa 42.50 m Durchmesser hat, hat am Aussenring etwa 45-50 automatische Heisdüsen, die nach Zündung der Scheibe, um eine im Zentrum befindliche plexiglas Kugel kreisen, in der befinden sich die Mess und Kontrollgeräte für Fernsteuerung befinden. In der Kugel ist noch genug Raum für hoch explosive Atombomben, diese Waffen befindet sich in Russiche Hand und kann einen Aktionsradius von 30-35000 km aufweisen, V. waffen Konstrukteur Riedel Deutschland sagt es ist eine Aypische V. 7 daran er selbst gearbeitet hat.
Ich bin froher das die Wahrheit besser ist als eine Panik unter Volk bei Nichtwissenheit. H.Sch.

PAGE 230

letter

A letter discussing a theoretical V-Weapon disc-like aircraft, followed by an editorial note assessing the literacy of the author.

FLYING SAUCERS

Since 1944 there have been experimental weapons which should now be in preduction. The one about which there has been so much discussion is a V-Weapon which has a disc-like round body, about 48.50 metres in diameter and has by way of emission 45 to 50 automatic ? ---------- (word not legible). With the setting off of the disc these rotate around a sensitive plexi-glass sphere in the center in which are located the -------- (word not legible) and guiding apparatus for distance flights. Inside the sphere there is also enough space for high explosive atom bombs. These weapons ------- ----- ----- ----- (not legible) and show an effective range of from 30 to 35,000 kilometres. V-Weapon Konstrus (Technician?) Riedel (or Riedet), Germany, says it is a typical V-Weapon on which he himself worked.

I am positive that the truth is better than keeping the people in ignorance .

H. Sch.

This letter is written apparently by a not highly literate person with undeveloped handwriting. It is my opinion that he is not making up what

PAGE 231

memo

A short memo dated August 4, 1952, suggesting that a letter should be turned over to the FBI or another agency for further investigation.

2.

he has written. If I were handling this, I should turn his letter over

to the FBI or some other investigating agency to see if he knows anything

more.

F.Y.

August 4, 1952

PAGE 232

other

An envelope addressed to The Cincinnati Enquirer, postmarked July 3, 1952, with a handwritten note in the margin.

[HANDWRITTEN: Not for the files]

THE

CINCINNATI

ENQUIRER

PAGE 233

other

This page is the back of an envelope containing a handwritten file reference number.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-599]

PAGE 234

other

An envelope addressed to The Cincinnati Enquirer, postmarked July 3, 1952, with handwritten marginalia.

[HANDWRITTEN: How you are]
THE
CINCINNATI
ENQUIRER

PAGE 235

other

This page is an image of a postmarked envelope addressed to The Cincinnati Enquirer, dated July 3, 1952.

[HANDWRITTEN: Not for publication]
THE
CINCINNATI
ENQUIRER

PAGE 236

other

This page contains only a handwritten case file number.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-292]

PAGE 237

letter

A handwritten letter to J. Edgar Hoover from a resident of Winding Gulf, West Virginia, suggesting the government stop media reports on flying saucers because it might be related to Russian inventions.

[HANDWRITTEN: Flying SAUCERS] Winding Gulf WVa. Aug 5 1952
Mr Edgar Hoover
a few lines to
let you know a few
things that the Gover
ment should know.
for all of US sake ps
stop the people from
Broad casting how
far these flying
Saucers are going, and
when they are seeing
them at [RECORDED - 118 INDEXED-118 62-83894-293] [HANDWRITTEN: AUG 7 1952] the
reason, Russia is
inventing some thing
[HANDWRITTEN: 68 AUG 13 1952] [HANDWRITTEN: no Inconye address 8/30]

PAGE 238

other

A handwritten note describing concerns about radio activity, atomic bombs, and suicide planes, signed by Margie M. Taylor.

that is coming over here by radio activity and later they will be sending the atomics bomb over here so try to stop them are now getting the distance and they send out one and then our people tells where they see at and that is all they want to know. Later on they will send suicide planes without air pilots here to bomb. [HANDWRITTEN: Margie M. Taylor]

PAGE 239

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mr. W. H. Jennings acknowledging receipt of his letter regarding flying saucers and informing him that the matter has been referred to the Department of the Air Force.

August 13, 1952

Mr. W. H. Jennings
3096 Hazelmary
Zone 17
Pontiac, Michigan
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-294]
RECORDED-30 Dear Mr. Jennings:

I have received your letter of August 5, 1952, and want to thank you for making the information contained therein available to this Bureau.

FX. - 69

The matter referred to in your letter is not within the jurisdiction of this Bureau and I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your letter to the Department of the Air Force for appropriate action.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

cc - 1 - Detroit
Note for Detroit:

Mr. Jennings advised the Bureau, in his letter, of his theory regarding flying saucers. It was Mr. Jennings' opinion flying saucers are manufactured by General Electric or General Motors Research Laboratories, consist of aluminum tanks filled with helium gas under pressure, and work on magnetic principles.

EHM:kc

[HANDWRITTEN: initials]
[HANDWRITTEN: initials]
[HANDWRITTEN: initials]

PAGE 240

other

This page contains various date stamps from the FBI and Department of Justice, indicating receipt of a document on August 13, 1952.

RECEIVED-LA
F B I
DEPT OF JUST
Aug 13 12 47 PM '52

REC'D-TOLSON'S OFFICE
Aug 13 5 32 PM '52

F. B. I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
JUSTICE
Aug 13 9 26 AM '52

RECEIVED-LA
MAIL ROOM
F B I DEPT OF JUST
Aug 13 5 09 PM '52

PAGE 241

letter

A handwritten letter from a citizen in Pontiac, Michigan, to the FBI expressing a theory that flying saucers are the 'brain child' of a General, rather than extraterrestrial.

Pontiac, Mich
Aug 5 '52
Of flying Discs
F.B.I. Wash D.C.
Gentlemen: Dear Sirs.
I have a theory on the so called flying saucers.
I don't know where to write to express my opinion.
But yours is the best office in the land when it comes to investigations.
If and when I get ready to comit a crime I will expect to get cought but so be it.
If the flying saucers are real then in my opinion they are not from another planet. I would be welling to bet they are the brain child of General [HANDWRITTEN: W. H. Jennings] [HANDWRITTEN: Mossburg] (over)
[HANDWRITTEN: 8-13-52 Left to Jennings & to OSI, EHM:tc]
[HANDWRITTEN: my]
[HANDWRITTEN: ark]

PAGE 242

letter

A handwritten letter speculating that unidentified discs are aluminum tanks filled with pressurized helium and equipped with permanent magnets to repel approaching metal objects.

(21

Electric or General Motors Research
Laboratories.

I am not an electrician all I know
about Elect. is to grab a hold of one
wire at a time on alternating current
and let direct current strictly alone.

It's my opinion that these discs
or what have you are aluminum
tanks filled with Helium gas under
a lot of pressure, and permanent magnets
(power full one) built on the sides
with the north polls outside.

When another metal object approaches
them, they are repulsed at the same
speed as the approaching object.

PAGE 243

other

A handwritten note discussing the flight characteristics of unidentified objects, suggesting they maintain distance from pursuing aircraft, and using a magnet analogy to explain the phenomenon.

(3)

when you look at it from that slant
you can see they can never be caught
no mater how fast the persuing plane
goes they retreat at the same speed.

One good way to check that would
be to have their plane to approach
at the angles [HANDWRITTEN: of] [HANDWRITTEN: not] [HANDWRITTEN: only] [HANDWRITTEN: not]

The retreating [HANDWRITTEN: of]
effect could not cross in front
of any of the plans it would [HANDWRITTEN: of]
have to go straight ahead.

You try and get the north pole of a
magnet and south pole to connect and
you will see what I mean.
(over)

PAGE 244

letter

A handwritten letter from W.H. Jennings proposing a method to capture 'saucers' using magnets mounted on airplanes.

(4)
I've seen a steel bar hang in space
at auto shows. it was nearly two
poles pushing against each other instead
of pulling together.
or push your watch or a piece
of steel through a demagnetizer
and you will see what I mean.
If a plane were equiped with
a magnet of about two or 3 Gs
and the north pole pointed at the
nose of the plane or stuck out ahead
of the propelly a foot or two I think
those saucers would be caught.
Respectfully yours
W.H. Jennings
3096 Hazelmary Pontiac Mich

PAGE 245

form

An FBI Service Unit Search Slip for William H. Jennings, noting file numbers 29-5180, 131-16-321, and 138-36400.

SERVICE UNIT
SEARCH SLIP
4-22a
Supervisor [HANDWRITTEN: Mossburg] Room [HANDWRITTEN: 3708]
Subj: [HANDWRITTEN: W.H. Jennings]
Exact Spelling
Searchers
[HANDWRITTEN: ✓] All References
Initial [HANDWRITTEN: 83]
Subversive Ref.
Date [HANDWRITTEN: 8-11]
Main File
Restricted to Locality of
[HANDWRITTEN: Michigan]
FILE NUMBER
SERIALS
29-5180
William H. Jennings
[HANDWRITTEN: 131-16-321]
William Harry Jennings
[HANDWRITTEN: 138-36400]
[HANDWRITTEN: file 5 Etw]
Initialed

PAGE 246

memo

An FBI memorandum from the Philadelphia SAC office reporting that Major H. B. Eliridge stated that the OSI is no longer interested in receiving reports regarding flying saucers.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : Director, FBI DATE: 8/7/52
FROM : SAC, Philadelphia
SUBJECT: FLYING SAUCERS
[HANDWRITTEN: ac] [HANDWRITTEN: O]
At the weekly liaison conference held in the Philadelphia
Office on August 5, 1952, Major H. B. ELIRIDGE advised that OSI is no longer
interested in receiving reports concerning flying saucers.
[HANDWRITTEN: es]
The above is submitted for the Bureau's information.
[HANDWRITTEN: Phipeox]
[HANDWRITTEN: lh]
JLK:ERG
RECORDED - 76
[HANDWRITTEN: Letter to SAC, Philadelphia 8/15/52 NWP]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-295]
[HANDWRITTEN: AUG 11 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: 34]
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-99]

PAGE 247

memo

An FBI memo from the Director to the SAC in Philadelphia regarding the OSI's stance on receiving flying saucer reports and the procedure for coordinating such information with the Air Technical Intelligence Center.

SAC, PHILADELPHIA August 15, 1952
RECORDED-29 DIRECTOR, FBI (62-83894) [HANDWRITTEN: 295]
FLYING SAUCERS
OSI LIAISON
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-25]
Reurlet August 7, 1952, in which you stated that at a weekly liaison conference held in Philadelphia Major H. B. Eldridge advised that OSI is no longer interested in receiving reports concerning flying saucers.
OSI, as the official Air Force liaison agency, has agreed to accept reports regarding flying saucers and to transmit these reports to the Air Technical Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, where all information pertaining to flying saucers is coordinated. If Major Eldridge still insists that he does not desire to receive reports regarding flying saucers, you should advise the Bureau and the matter will be discussed further with OSI Headquarters in Washington, D. C.
NWP:hke
[HANDWRITTEN: hke]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE]]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
Tolson
Ladd
Nichols
Belmont
Clegg
Glavin
Harbo
Rosen
Tracy
Mohr
Tele. Rm.
Nease
Gandy
[HANDWRITTEN: 247]
MAILED 3
AUG 15 1952
COMM FBI
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] 12 33 625]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] DE 1021CE]
FBI
RECEIVED ROOM
60 AUG 20 1952

PAGE 248

memo

A brief internal FBI memorandum recommending that a copy of an attached document be forwarded to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations.

RECORDED 58 AUGUST 15 1952

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-248]

In view of the fact that the information contained in the attached memorandum is of a nature that might be of interest to the Air Force, it is recommended that a copy of this memorandum be furnished to the Office of Special Investigations, Air Force, for their information and such action as they deem appropriate.

[HANDWRITTEN: 8/15/52]

RECEIVED-MAIL ROOM
F B I
U S DEPT. OF JUSTICE
AUG 15 4 33 PM '52

PAGE 249

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mr. Dewey T. Wilson acknowledging receipt of his letter and informing him that it is being forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force.

August 5, 1952

[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 57]
[HANDWRITTEN: INDEXED - 57]
[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-296]
Mr. Dewey T. Wilson
2727 Maryland Avenue
Baltimore 18, Maryland
[HANDWRITTEN: D. T. WILSON]

Dear Mr. Wilson:

Your letter postmarked July 30, 1952, has been received, and I appreciate the interest prompting you to bring your comments to my attention.

Since your communication may be of interest to another governmental agency, I am taking the liberty of forwarding a copy of it to The Honorable, The Secretary of the Air Force, Department of Defense Building, The Pentagon, Washington 25, D. C.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

DIC:amk:mfo

CoCopy of incoming sent to the Secretary of the Air Force by short form.

PAGE 250

memo

A brief administrative note indicating that a copy of an incoming document was sent to the Secretary of the Air Force by the State Department, with a U.S. Department of Justice mail room stamp.

Copy of incoming sent to the Secretary of the Air Force
by state dept.

[HANDWRITTEN: 65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 6]

[STAMP: RECEIVED MAIL ROOM U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE AUG 3 10 PM '57]

PAGE 251

letter

A letter from a citizen to J. Edgar Hoover proposing a theory that UFOs are atmospheric light phenomena caused by radio/television beams interacting with moist vapor.

2727 Maryland ave
Baltimore 18 Md
July 28-1952
[HANDWRITTEN: OF FLYING SAUCERS]
J. Edgar Hoover
F.B.I.
Washn DC
Dear sir,
I would like to submit a theory
that may lead to a solution of what
the flying saucers really are -
These objects could be Lights.
Caused by Radio Television Beams
illuminating moist vapor, not unlike
phosphorus on rain soaked wood in
certain seasons - The northern lights
"aurora Borealis" have manifested themselves
for years, setting up Electromagnetism
& Earth potential which distorts normal
Telegraph communications. The lights
are somewhat like a fan & can
be seen as far south as Equator
It is my opinion that flying
Saucers are Electrical (small clouds)
currents onto a space
and causing it to glow - this
cloud being charged Electrically &
a Magnetic polarity being same
as the interceptor it can never
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] ack 8-4-52 DDC]
[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED 62-83894-296]
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-25]
[HANDWRITTEN: AUG 1952]

PAGE 252

letter

A handwritten letter from Dewey T. Wilson proposing a test to determine if silencing TV and radio broadcasts affects the appearance of 'saucers'.

be overtaken and would if pursued gradually grow dimmer & disappear giving the impression that it outdistanced the pursuer with a great burst of speed - 
This is submitted as a theory as I do not have the power or facilities to prove or disprove. But I submit a suggestion whereby a test could be made. 
When these saucers appear again have the TV & all broadcasts silenced from the air and check for results - This may not change immediately, as other elements in this [HANDWRITTEN: DEPT OF JUSTICE FBI RECEIVED MR JONES JUL 31 3 41 PM '52] not be turned off or on at a given signal - 
However I believe that, if the idea as set forth in my crude way is submitted to more learned persons then some solution is inevitable - 
Dewey T. Wilson

PAGE 253

letter

A letter from Dewey T. Wilson to J. Edgar Hoover proposing a theory that UFOs are electrically induced lights caused by radio and television beams interacting with moist vapor.

T COPY

2727 Maryland ave
Baltimore 18 MD
July 28-1952

J. Edgar Hoover
F.B.I.
Washn DC

Dear sir,

I would like to submit a theory that may lead to a solution of what the Flying saucers really are-these objects could be Lights. caused by Radio Television Beams illuminating moist vapor, not unlike phosphous on rain soaked wood in certain seasons-the northern lights "aurora Borealus" have manifested themselves for years, setting up Electro magnetism & Earth potential which distorts normal Telegraph Communications. The lights are somewhat like a Fan & can be seen as far south as Equator-

It is my opinion that Flying Saucers are Electrically induced currents onto a space (small clouds) and causing it to glow-this cloud being charged Electrically and a magnetic polarity being same as the interceptor it can never be overtaken, and would if persued gradually grow Dimmer & dissappear giving the impression that it out distanced the persuer with a great Burst of speed.

This is submitted as a theory as I do not have the power or facilities to prove or disprove. But I submit a suggestion whereby a test could be made.

When these saucers appear again Have the TV & all Broadcasts silenced from the air and check for results-this may not change immediately, as other Elements in this Build up can not be turned off or on at a given signal.

However I firmly believe that, if the idea as set forth in my crude way is submitted to more learned persons then I some solution is inevitable.

/s/ Dewey T. Wilson

PAGE 254

memo

An internal FBI memorandum from E. H. Mossburg to W. A. Branigan regarding the filing of a Sunday Graphic article about flying disks received from the American Embassy in London.

STANDARD FORM NO. 64
Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO : W. A. Branigan [HANDWRITTEN: WAB over EHM] DATE: August 12, 1952
FROM : E. H. Mossburg [HANDWRITTEN: EHM]
SUBJECT: FLYING DISKS [HANDWRITTEN: all my]

There is attached a copy of a periodical entitled "Sunday Graphic" dated July 6, 1952, received by the Bureau from the Office of the Legal Attache, American Embassy, London, England.

It is desired that the attached periodical containing an article relating to the captioned matter be filed in the captioned file.

Attachment

EHM:kc

[HANDWRITTEN: ENCL 44]
[HANDWRITTEN: 5-EHM]
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE]]
ENCL. ATTACHED
RECORDED - 44 62-83894-277
INDEXED - 44 AUG 13 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: [ILLEGIBLE] AUG 28 1952]

PAGE 255

cover-page

This is a blank envelope cover page containing a file reference number.

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-297] ENCLOSURE

PAGE 256

press-release

This page is an article from Look magazine titled 'The Truth About Flying Saucers' by Dr. Donald H. Menzel, an astronomer who argues that UFO sightings are misidentified natural phenomena.

Look
VOLUME 16, NUMBER 13
JUNE 17, 1952

[HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-281]

This might be a picture of flying saucers taken at night over Arizona or New Mexico. It was in fact taken in Dr. Menzel's laboratory at Harvard University.

THE TRUTH ABOUT
FLYING SAUCERS

One of America's leading astronomers goes into his laboratory
at Harvard and disposes of the flying-saucer myth. He adds sim-
ple instructions for making flying saucers in your own kitchen

By Dr. DONALD H. MENZEL

Donald H. Menzel is
professor of astrophys-
ics and associate direc-
tor of solar research at
Harvard University.
His work on flying sau-
cers was done in re-
sponse to a request
from LOOK. The Air
Force has expressed a
lively interest in it.

I SUPPOSE that I should be especially well
qualified to write about flying saucers since
I happen to be one of the few persons who has
actually seen one.

My solar studies take me frequently to
Colorado and New Mexico, and I was at the
Holloman Air Base, near Alamogordo, N. M.,
at the height of the flying-saucer scare. That
very morning, I had glimpsed what seemed to
be several saucers moving overhead-until I
focused my eyes more clearly and recognized
the objects as weather balloons. That after-
noon, I expressed my belief that most of the
saucers could be thus explained. But others in
the group-including several well-known sci-
entists-indicated that there was probably more
to the saucer story than that.

Early that evening, I had my second attack
of saucers. I was in the back seat of an auto-
mobile, being driven toward Alamogordo and
admiring the full moon as it rose over Sacra-
mento Peak toward the east. A few degrees
north of the moon, I noticed what seemed to
be a bright star, and then a second star not far
from the first. Casually, I assumed that they
were Castor and Pollux in the constellation of
CONTINUED
35

PAGE 257

other

This page contains an article discussing the Lubbock Lights, providing a scientific perspective on why people misidentify natural phenomena as flying saucers.

FLYING SAUCERS
continued

[IMAGE: A photograph of the Lubbock Lights]

These are the Lubbock Lights, as photographed Aug. 30, 1951, over Lubbock, Texas, by 18-year-old Carl Hart, Jr.

Orderly processes
of natural laws
explain saucers

Gemini. Then, very suddenly, I realized that Gemini was a winter object; the two stars had to be something else.
Like most astronomers, I am always hopeful of finding a nova (exploding star) which can be seen with the naked eye, so I rapidly opened the window of the car for a better look. I could bring neither of these objects into clear focus, although nearby Antares was sharp. Both hazy disks shone with a slightly bluish light. They were, in a sense, "flying" simply because they were elevated. Suddenly, alive to the fact that I was seeing something unusual, I asked the driver to stop. We climbed out of the car just in time to see the saucery literally fade away as mysteriously as they had appeared. I reported the occurrence in detail to the Air Force.
I later found that an English meteorologist, Edward J. Lowe, had recorded a similar phenomenon as long ago as 1838—similar except for the fact he saw four instead of two ghostly images flying near the moon.
Perhaps you expect me to say, at this point, that I can explain exactly what I saw that evening. I am sorry to disappoint you. I cannot. I have certain ideas on the subject, but they are only hypotheses—reasonable but not yet fully confirmed.
I shall explain those ideas, but first let me say what I do NOT believe. I do NOT believe that what I saw, or anything anyone has reported seeing, were missiles or messengers or vehicles from the moon or Mars or space. I do NOT believe they were missiles or messengers or vehicles from Russia or any other foreign country.
Indeed, how simple science and life would be if every time we encountered some seemingly inexplicable fact, we could blame it on some outside force over which we have no control. Such a mode of thought is as old as man himself. Our prehistoric ancestors personalized all the forces of nature. Gods blew the winds, threw lightning bolts and stoked the fires that belch forth from volcanic craters.
Brilliant showers of meteors have made men fear that the end of the world was imminent. The ancients have interpreted a solar eclipse as a dragon devouring the sun and rejoiced when their beating drums and weapons frightened the dragon away.
How simple this type of science. No laboratory experiment to prove or test the hypotheses. No complicated mathematics to study the details of the process. Nothing to argue about here. For each new and unexplained fact, we invent a new god—or assume the existence of a superintelligence.
How simple—and how wrong!
Centuries of civilization have taught us the futility of inventing mysterious forces and superhuman beings. You could explain anything that way. Such explanations, however, are completely useless and nature falls into chaos, subject to the whim of a pagan deity instead of to the orderly processes of natural laws.

"An Uncivilized Attitude"
As a scientist, I am not bothered if I cannot give a complete, iron-clad explanation for every phenomenon I meet. Unraveling the puzzles of science is my business—as well as my pleasure. I find the world still full of unsolved problems. I look for the explanations, but I do not arbitrarily invent forces that make explanation unnecessary.
Why, then, have so many civilized people chosen to adopt an uncivilized attitude toward flying saucers? I think there are three reasons:
First, flying saucers are unusual. All of us are used to regularity. We naturally attribute mystery to the unusual.
Second, we are all nervous. We live in a world that has suddenly become hostile. We have unleashed forces we cannot control; many persons fear we are heading toward a war that will end in the destruction of civilization.
Third, people enjoy being frightened a little. They go to Boris Karloff double features.
But such analysis should concern the psychologist rather than the natural scientist, so let me hasten back to our flying saucers.
First of all, we must recognize that "flying saucers," in the public mind, cover a wide variety of objects and phenomena. Some of them, we can almost immediately dispose of, although the mere fact of their misinterpretation has been one of the chief difficulties men have encountered in getting at the basic truth.
A man sitting in the park on a calm summer afternoon scarcely realizes how intense the winds aloft may be. Perhaps real gales exist, with speeds in excess of 60 miles an hour, different layers moving in opposite directions. Light, flat objects such as newspapers or kites can be caught in an occasional whirlwind and lifted to enormous heights, where they may fly for hundreds of miles before they again reach the ground. Weather balloons, which are often released in groups rather than singly, are not at all uncommon. Indeed, most such objects lose their true identity when viewed against the sky. And it is extremely hard to recognize them.
Occasional reflections from distant planes or even from the backs of high-flying birds account for some of the reports. The planet Venus has, on many occasions, produced its own series of sensations. Few people seem to realize that this planet, when at greatest brilliance, can be plainly seen in the daytime. If floating cirrus clouds overlie it, the planet may give the illusion of being in rapid motion. Men people find it difficult to focus their eyes on distant object; hence, they see a bright blur in the sky and thus give rise to another flying saucer story.

PAGE 258

other

A magazine article describing the Brooks Costume Company, its business operations, and its role in costuming various theater, film, and circus productions.

“costumes executed by BROOKS”
This familiar theater-program credit represents a $2,000,000-a-year gross business, costuming everything from Broadway stars to circus elephants

THE 39-year-old Brooks Costume Company is the biggest in the business. It is responsible for the eye appeal of 80 per cent of Broadway's current musicals. It does a large part of New York's TV-costume business and will open a TV service branch in Hollywood shortly. Brooks' biggest regular customer is the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey circus, with its annual $300,000 wardrobe. And for $400,000, Brooks costumed Cecil B. de Mille's movie about that circus. Arena skating shows like Hollywood Ice Revue, Sonja Henie's Ice Show, Holiday on Ice run about $200,000 for costumes — three times most Broadway show budgets.

The bulk of Brooks' business, however, does not come from its big customers like Roxy and Radio City shows, Guys and Dolls chorus lines, The King and I costumes. It comes from the 175-odd shows Brooks outfits weekly for universities, drama clubs, church societies, junior leagues, civic pageants, summer theaters and municipal operas all over the country. Brooks has 135,000 costumes for rent, from $2000 ball gowns once owned by Mrs. Robert Ogden Goelet to Indian costumes from Annie Get Your Gun. For $10 a night, the lead in a Northwestern University play goes on in a gown once worn by Maude Adams, Bea Lillie or Mary Martin.

This is possible because of suave, silver-haired James E. Stroock's policy of buying back the costumes he was originally paid a fat fee to make. “He's king of his own state,” says producer John Murray Anderson. Famous for his nicknames, he calls Stroock, president of Brooks, “The Pope,” “because he is so omnipotent.”

Produced by PATRICIA COFFIN
CONTINUED

Routine sight at Brooks: a show girl hurrying off to try on her next costume.

A wardrobe is born: designer Irene Sharaff with producers Ben Segal, Chandler Cowles in Stroock's office.

First, costumes are made in drab muslin, tried on for freedom of movement. Later, best materials are used.

Irene Sharaff discusses Paul Hartman's vice-presidential pants for Of Thee I Sing.

PAGE 259

other

An article discussing the theory that flying saucer sightings are caused by atmospheric temperature inversions and mirage phenomena, including descriptions of laboratory experiments to simulate these effects.

conditions exist, flying saucers become likely

spread out horizontally to form a thin layer of smoke and haze. This ceiling occurs at the point of highest temperature. Smoke, dust and all kinds of general haze tend to collect in this layer. From below or above, you may not be aware of its existence. But as you pass through it, you see a fine black line extending from horizon to horizon.

On that famous day in June, 1947, when Kenneth Arnold of Boise, Idaho, spotted from his private plane nine distant saucers moving at "fantastic speeds" along the slopes of Mt. Rainier, he may well have been flying not too far from one of these layers of inversion haze. His was the observation that touched off the saucer scare.

Let us turn to the official Air Force release and quote Arnold himself: "I could see their outline quite plainly against the snow as they approached the mountain. They flew very close to the mountain tops, directly south to southeast down the hog's back of the range, flying like geese. I watched for about three minutes -a chain of saucerlike things at least five miles long, swerving in and out of the high mountain peaks. They were flat like a pie pan and so shiny they reflected the sun like a mirror."

In Arnold's own story, there are several clues that should have pointed out the answer long ago. Anyone familiar with mountains knows that the ridges, where ascending currents of air from opposite sides meet and mix, are subject to the most violent drafts. From the Harvard and University of Colorado observatory at Climax, Colo., I have observed with a telescope the blowing snow on the ridges of 14,000-foot peaks, and have noted the billowing gusts rage along the "hog's back." It is indeed highly probable that the slopes of Mt. Rainier are equally turbulent. And, if their turbulence reaches upward into the haze, the warped layers would reflect sunlight and a progression of moves would make the crests seem to move with phenomenal speed.

And if you doubt whether mere bending or crinkling of a hazy layer could cause the bright reflection, note how a fold of a lace curtain-or piece of cheesecloth-similarly reflects the light. The reflection is brightest when the curvature is sharpest. Most daytime saucers are a variant of this phenomenon. The mirage effect is here of secondary importance.

The "ghost" balloons are perhaps the simplest of all mirage phenomena. The balloon itself is responsible. As it "punctures" some fairly high inversion, a large bubble of colder air settles down from above, forming in effect a sort of supermagnifying lens or telescope. This imperfect lens of air forms an image of the balloon. And, as the lens changes its size and shape, the distorted image darts wildly around, with phenomenal speed-like a reflection of the sun from a hand mirror.

To demonstrate some of these effects-chiefly those associated with the luminous night saucers-I prepared a simple laboratory experiment, as follows: I filled a cylindrical jar half full of benzene and carefully floated a layer of acetone on top. Gentle stirring produced a narrow region where the chemical composition changed slowly upward. Benzene has optical qualities analogous to those of cold air and acetone to those of warm air. I thus reproduced in a small space what would ordinarily require miles of terrestrial atmosphere. The liquids produce remarkable effects.

A beam of light, focused diagonally upward from a small slide projector, would ordinarily strike the ceiling. But caught in the "inversion layer," the beam obediently curved downward. Tiny globules of glycerine emulsified in the benzene scattered the light and made the beam visible. The original circular pinhole used in the projector was distorted into an oval shape and clearly marked with some pattern suggesting a surface structure.

Laboratory "Saucers"

Any motion of the liquid-produced as the result of a rocking-made the saucer slip about. Turbulence, caused by a delicate stirring of the medium near the light beam, gave dozens of flying disks. The color effects, resulting in part from the glycerine globules, were startling and beautiful. Finally, when I replaced the single pinhole with a row that simulated distant street lights, the resulting images behaved and looked like the Lubbock Lights.

These considerations do not explain everything. The green fire balls are still something of a mystery, though many will prove to be meteors. Prof. Fred L. Whipple of Harvard has called my attention to the fact that the color probably arises from the presence of magnesium in the meteor itself. This metal, well known to be an abundant constituent of the rock meteors, emits green light when incandescent. The reported slowness of motion may be due to great distance, associated with the clarity of the desert skies.

This mirage-phenomena theory includes the flying saucers seen on radarscopes. The same sort of conditions which cause optical mirages cause radar mirages as well, as any radar expert will hasten to tell you. They cause television mirages too. Everyone knows cases where a television station, normally miles out of range, suddenly comes in powerful and steady.

Also, the stress laid on the optical peculiarities of air over deserts should not be misleading. The temperature inversions of which I speak are common over the desert (and over coastal waters) but they are not limited to such areas. They can appear anywhere, and do. A bad smog, for example, is usually a sign of a temperature inversion. But they are more frequent over deserts, which explains in part the fact that saucer reports are more frequent over deserts.

You, too, can have flying saucers in your home. Perhaps not as elaborate as the ones I have just described, but nevertheless adequate to demonstrate some of the effects. You may simulate the gradual bending that causes a mirage by using a sharp reflection at a water surface.

Fill the kitchen sink to the brim and set up a candle or row of candles close to the edge along one side. A box with a series of pinholes illuminated by a light or candle is even better. Now face the lights from the opposite side of the sink, keeping your eye close to the water surface and see the bright reflections. Now have someone gently stir the water and produce waves. The lights will float and travel-and even show the disklike form characteristic of a reflection from the trough of a wave. One can even reproduce the saucers with light reflected from the surface of coffee in a cup.

As I have said earlier, these experiments are suggestive rather than definitive. More work is necessary to prove the phenomenon. The analysis indicates, however, a clear plan for future study and research. I believe that these experiments will eventually cause the saucer scare to vanish-most appropriately, into thin air, the region that gave birth to it.
END

The forces entrusted with the defense of the U. S. from the skies must look for "flying saucers." In its next issue, Look will tell the story of this secret hunt by our aerial defenders.

In normal air, light from the ground simply spreads out into space. Outside its range, where the earth curves away, there is darkness and no strange phenomena.

With a temperature inversion, light bends in refracting layer of air. A ray of light will thus be seen in areas far distant from its source.

WARM AIR
REFRACTING AIR LAYER
COLD SURFACE

PAGE 260

other

This page discusses the possibility that UFOs (saucers) are optical phenomena, specifically mirages caused by temperature inversions in the atmosphere, and compares desert conditions to city conditions regarding visibility.

FLYING SAUCERS continued

Wherever certain well-known ai

luminous by night. They may appear singly, in clusters or fly in precise geometrical formation. The best-defined patterns of this type have been called the Lubbock Lights, since their best-known appearance was in Lubbock, Texas. They have, however, appeared elsewhere. Next, we have the mysterious balls of green fire. Are they or are they not related to the luminous “Foo Fighters” that occasionally seem to accompany a plane or even engage it in a mysterious sort of shadowboxing? Finally, there are the “ghost” saucers that seem to hover suspiciously around a freshly launched balloon, and rush off at some unprecedented speed—presumably to report their findings. At least four such ghosts have been reliably reported.

Many of the records refer to some tremendous distance or speed. And here I ask this question: How can an observer on the ground, from a single station and with his eyes alone, give a reliable estimate of all three figures: distance, size and speed? If you think that this is easy, try it sometime—on the moon, for example.

The reported saucers move at varied angular speeds, either sideways or vertical. Their unknown actual speed depends on how far away they actually are. They may “veer” sharply at any given moment. At times, the images are extremely brilliant. Sometimes, they show a trace of structure, which some observers have associated with “windows” or “portholes” of a space craft.

They move without sound and hence seem to be controlled without any normal forces of power that we would ascribe to a craft on earth. The objects are generally round or oval and bear no resemblance to any known aircraft already built or being built on earth.

But are we justified in reversing these arguments and saying that, since no terrestrial craft could have such properties and since no human beings could withstand the tremendous buffeting that the flying saucers seem to get, the objects must perforce be space ships manned by beings of decidedly nonhuman characteristics? I ask again: Is this sweeping conclusion justified? Or shall we accept temporarily what seems to be a much more reasonable alternative: that the flying saucers are not material objects at all?

The one thing that can respond instantaneously to force is a light beam. You can stand at the foot of a high mountain and with a hand mirror flash a signal from base to peak and back again, a distance of more than 10 miles, in a tenth of a second or less. But, if we see something flashing over cliff and forest with a speed of 100 miles a second or accelerating with a force 1000 times greater than that of gravity, must we conclude that it is a manned craft?

An Optical Phenomenon?

Let us, then, accept as a working hypothesis the idea that saucers may be an optical phenomenon—though nonetheless real.

To me as a scientist, this was the only course along which to proceed. And the hypothesis that these were optical phenomena, taking place primarily in desert regions, inevitably brought the next logical consideration to my mind.

In the science of atmospherics, there is a well-known condition known as “temperature inversion.” It is simple enough. Normally, the air grows colder as one goes farther up from the surface of the earth. But sometimes the reverse is true, and a layer of warm air overlies layers of colder air.

During the year, I was a member and later chairman of the Wave Propagation Committee of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which conducted a series of tests on the desert. We were studying radar images; but light behaves, in many ways, like radar. What we learned about the desert applies as much to light as to radar.

We learned that temperature inversions were, as we had expected, extremely common on the desert. During the day, the desert is extremely hot. At night (or even during the day under certain cloud conditions), the ground rapidly cools off. But the air cools more slowly. Thus, the air cools more quickly where it actually is in contact with the ground, but for some distance continues to get warmer with height. Then, well away from the ground, it begins to become cooler again.

Scientists have long known that regions of the atmosphere wherein the temperature changes rapidly with height can cause a mirage. That is the key to the whole problem of saucers. And, working on that assumption, I have been able to reproduce in the laboratory most of the essential features of the saucers. Much more study, both theoretical and experimental, is necessary before we shall understand this complicated problem in all its details. I am confident, however, that we can eventually produce and observe the phenomenon at about any time we wish to.

Mirage. A mirage is fundamentally an image caused by a lens of air. Since air lenses are almost never perfect, the world we see through them is distorted and unreal. Like seeing through spectacles that do not fit your eyes. Or looking in one of those highly curved mirrors in an amusement park.

And yet you see mirages every day, without really knowing it. As you drive along a highway on a hot day, the dark asphalt in the distance seems to be covered with water—a film that evaporates as the car advances. This is the ordinary mirage we familiarly associate with the desert: the thirsty traveler, the vision of a receding lake, and only sand. The water, of course, is an image of the sky, projected against the distant landscape. The light rays that produce the illusion traverse a path that is concave upward.

But give us a cool layer of air at the ground, as in the desert at night, and light rays will curve in the reverse direction, following along the surface of the earth.

City Lights Become “Saucers”

Where the daytime mirage projects the image of the sky against the earth, the nighttime desert variety projects the image of the earth against the sky. And hence, if we have distant lights—such as those of a city—these lights will appear to float in the sky. Moreover, if the intervening air contains waves or is turbulent to any degree, the lights will appear to move, riding in on the crest of a wave, like ripples of moonlight on the ocean. If the source is a line of distant street lamps, the images appear to fly in formation—the Lubbock Light phenomenon.

One further property of these temperature inversions serves to emphasize the effect and undoubtedly contributes to the daytime saucers. They usually lie higher than the ones that occur at night on the desert. You can often see them—or at least recognize their existence.

A column of smoke from a distant chimney will sometimes rise smoothly upward and then

The clear air of the desert, and the lack of buildings or of hills, make it possible to see long distances, increase the number of observed events.

In the city, the angle of vision is small and the sky is full of smoke and dust. Thus, even if conditions were perfect for “saucers,” fewer would be observed over cities.

ANGLE OF VISION

ANGLE OF VISION

PAGE 261

report

This page discusses historical reports of UFOs, specifically the Lubbock Lights and an 1893 sighting from H.M.S. Caroline, while providing a scientific explanation for the phenomena using laboratory experiments conducted by Dr. Menzel.

Photographed by Arthur Rothstein
Dr. Menzel begins setting up his apparatus, using a large glass jar, benzene and acetone.
These “lights” were one of many sets of “saucers” made by Dr. Menzel in his laboratory. Note the “mother ship.”

Acetone floating on benzene simulates air levels; lens effect distorts Dr. Menzel’s face.

But by no means all of the objects can be so dismissed. After we have eliminated the false saucers and the erroneous reports that we trace to misidentification, there do remain a number that we cannot completely write off. Such as the ones I saw myself.

The first question we are called upon to answer is this: If these objects are natural objects, why did they suddenly appear for the first time in 1947? An honest question and a basic one; for if it cannot be answered, we are in difficulties. But the answer is simple: They were seen in the skies long before 1947. Scientific literature is full of them.

England Had Durham Lights
Take, for example, the Lubbock Lights, which appeared in the sky near Lubbock, Texas, last summer and were photographed. Similar phenomena have been long reported. England was mildly excited over the Durham Lights almost a century ago.

In 1897, our papers were filled with stories about a mysterious cigar-shaped airship seen at odd places over the country. The lights and men aboard were clearly visible. Finally, the great inventor Thomas A. Edison himself disposed of the rumor.

Here is a quotation from the magazine Nature for May 25, 1893: “During a recent wintry cruise in H.M.S. Caroline, a curious phenomenon was seen. . . . Unusual lights were reported by the officer of the watch. They appeared sometimes as a mass, at others spread out in an irregular line. They bore north until I lost sight of them about midnight. . . The globes of fire altered in their formation . . . now in a massed group with an outlying light, then the isolated one would disappear and the others would take the form of a crescent of diamonds.”

The account also mentioned a “looming mirage,” of which I shall have more to say later. This report interests me for two reasons: First, it would almost serve as a description of the Lubbock Lights. Second, my own theory of the Lubbock Lights was developed, and tested in my laboratory, before I found this account in Nature—and my theory directly associates looming mirages with the lights.

The next question is quite natural: Even granting that these phenomena have a long history, why are they so much more frequent today than in the past?

List the places where flying saucers have been seen, and you will notice that the great majority were reported in very hot areas, over deserts—in Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. For years, these states were sparsely settled.

But since the war began, they are the areas in which the most startling population growth has been tallied. Irrigation has brought farmers in. The dry heat has made tourist havens of Phoenix and Tucson. The air age has made these flat, clear-skied areas the natural locations for great bomber and fighter bases. Finally, atomic energy has chosen New Mexico as its headquarters.

In brief, there are more eyes to scan the heavens. Hence, more is seen. The answer is as simple as that. The clear skies are themselves a partial answer. Beyond two or three miles, especially toward the horizon, the milky haze cuts down visibility in Eastern areas. In the West, one is accustomed to seeing a mountain peak more than 150 miles away.

Finally, the most important question of all: If the saucers aren’t superhuman or controlled by superhumans, what are they?

First, we must study the reports.

A careful analysis of all the available data indicates that—after we have subtracted the balloons, papers, distant planes, Venus and the like—a substantial amount of reliable but unexplained material still remains. This falls into several definite patterns: ovals, disks or other patterns, either shining silver by day or
CONTINUED

A glass rod seems to bend as it passes from one liquid to other. Light bends in this way.

A light shining through the liquids bends at the meeting point. Same is true in air layers.

PAGE 262

memo

An FBI memo from J. Edgar Hoover to the Air Force regarding a report from Dr. R. E. McIndoo about observing unidentified objects dropped from a formation of planes over Thessalon Lake, Ontario, on July 27, 1952.

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL

62-83894

[HANDWRITTEN: 4]

Date: August 11, 1952
To: Director of Special Investigations
The Inspector General
Department of the Air Force
The Pentagon
Washington 25, D. C.

From: John Edgar Hoover - Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Subject: FLYING SAUCERS SEEN NEAR THESSALON LAKE, ONTARIO, CANADA, JULY 27, 1952
MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING

Dr. R. E. McIndoo, 820 West Walnut Street, Kokomo, Indiana, on July 30, 1952, advised that on July 27, 1952, at approximately 10:00 A. M. while fishing in the back waters of Thessalon Lake, Ontario, Canada, he noticed a formation of bombing planes, sixteen to twenty in number, in two groups flying south at a height estimated by him to be four or five miles.

Dr. McIndoo stated that the planes went over the lake and suddenly dropped objects, at first thought by him to be parachutes. He continued that these objects fell straight for a short time, then suddenly spurted vapor and at a high rate of speed flew off in a southwesterly direction.

Dr. McIndoo was unable to identify the nationality of the planes, but stated that they had twin trails of bluish smoke. He further stated that the objects which had been dropped from the planes had single trails of bluish smoke.

[HANDWRITTEN: Tolson, Ladd, Nichols, Belmont, Clegg, Glavin, Harbo, Rosen, Tracy, Laughlin, Mohr, Tele. Rm., Holloman, Gandy]

SECURITY INFORMATION - CONFIDENTIAL
RECORDED-86 62-83894
[HANDWRITTEN: 2040 8/31/77]
COMM - FBI EX. - 69
AUG 13 1952
80
AUG 11 1952
MAILED 27
[HANDWRITTEN: 53 AUG 19 1952]

PAGE 263

PAGE 264

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Mrs. Nellie T. Dull informing her that her previous communication regarding an unspecified subject is not within the jurisdiction of the FBI.

August 21, 1952

RECORDED - 64 62-83874-277
Mrs. Nellie T. Dull
Route 3
Staunton, Virginia

Dear Mrs. Dull:

I wish to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated August 12, 1952, addressed to Air Force Intelligence, the Justice Department, and this Bureau.

A careful review of the contents of your communication fails to reflect that the subject matter contained therein is within the jurisdiction of this Bureau.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

cc - 2 - Richmond - with copy of incoming

KWD:rel:mes

Note: Bufiles fail to reflect any identifiable record on the addressee.

PAGE 265

PAGE 266

letter

A handwritten letter from a citizen in Staunton, Virginia, to the Air Force, FBI, and Justice Department claiming that their ideas regarding flying saucers were stolen by a physicist named Nod Scott.

[HANDWRITTEN: Staunton, Va. Route 3 August 12, 1952]

[HANDWRITTEN: Air Force Intelligence
F. B. I.
Justice Dept.

Fellow Americans,

I am writing the same letter to all three Departments. On August 1st, I wrote a letter, and mailed it on August 2nd to the Air Force Intelligence telling my views of a [HANDWRITTEN: OF FLYING SAUCERS] flying saucer. In about four days the physicist Nod Scott gave out a report of findings identical to my report. Now if I have hit upon the meaning of a flying saucer I would like to get the credit for it. I have reason to believe my ideas have been hi-jacked. It should be easy to find out when did Mr. Scott start his experiment? Which office did my letter go through? Was my letter placed on file? It had a return address. If you cannot find it that proves it was destroyed and the information used.

I have much better working proof of my theory than Mr. Scott, which has been before me all along, until I hit upon the idea.

The solution should not have been published, there is a great deal more to it than that, which I can explain. The idea should have been worked out thoroughly and secretly. Rainmakers could probably do a great deal of harm with the answer. There is a possibility that it could mean a entirely different type of air warfare. The Air Force could possibly use it for defensive warfare. It could lead to man-made flying saucers which the enemy could use against us.]

[HANDWRITTEN: RECORDED - 61 INDEXED - 61 62-83894-299 AUG 24 1952]
[HANDWRITTEN: Let ack 8/21/52 KWD]

PAGE 267

letter

A letter from Mrs. Nellie T. Dull of Staunton, Virginia, to the Air Force, speculating on the potential military and scientific uses of flying saucers and asking for guidance on whether to keep her impressions secret or share them with the press.

Man-made flying saucers possibly could be used in conjunction with atom and hydrogen bombs or to destroy them. astronomers could use the information to predict about other planets or planetary warfare. This information could be of use in a trips to the moon.
Does the air force wish me to keep my impressions to myself or shall I give a statement to the press? my country comes first if the information should be kept secret.
I signed my other letter respectfully; when a lady from Virginia pays her respects to the air force she expects the air force to pay its respects right back to her.
Respectfully,
Mrs Nellie T. Dull
Route 3,
Staunton,
Virginia
[HANDWRITTEN: MRS. NELLIE T. DULL]

PAGE 268

letter

A letter from Mrs. Nellie T. Dull to Air Force Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department expressing concern that her theories on flying saucers were stolen by physicist Noel Scott and speculating on the potential military and scientific applications of the technology.

C O P Y

Staunton, Va.
Route 3
August 12, 1952

Air Force Intelligence
F. B. I.
Justice Dept.

Fellow Americans,

I am writing the same letter to all three Departments. On August 1st, I wrote a letter, and mailed it on August 2nd, to the Air Force Intelligence telling my views of a flying saucer. In about four days the physicist Noel Scott gave out a report of findings identical to my report. Now if I have hit upon the meaning of a flying saucer I would like to get the credit for it. I have reason to believe my ideas have been hi-jacked. It should be easy to find out. When did Mr. Scott start his experiment? Which office did my letter go through? Was my letter placed on file? It had a return address. If you cannot find it that proves it was destroyed and the information used.

I have much better working proof of my theory than Mr. Scott, which has been before me all along, until I hit upon the idea.

The solution should not have been published. There is a great deal more to it than that, which I can explain. The idea should have been worked out thoroughly and secretly. Rainmakers could probably do a great deal of harm with the answer. There is a possibility that it could mean an entirely different type of air warfare. The Air Force could possibly use it for defensive warfare. It could lead to man-made flying saucers which the enemy could use against us.

Man-made flying saucers possibly could be used in conjunction with atom and hydrogen bombs or to destroy them. Astronomers could use the information to predict about other planets or planetary warfare. This information could be of use in a trip to the moon.

Does the Air Force wish me to keep my impressions to myself or shall I give a statement to the press? My Country comes first if the information should be kept secret.

I signed my other letter "respectfully." When a lady from Virginia pays her respects to the Air Force she expects the Air Force to pay its respects right back to her.

Respectfully,

Mrs. Nellie T. Dull
Route 3
Staunton,
Virginia

PAGE 269

form

This is an FBI search slip form for a subject named Mrs. Nellie T. Dull, dated August 29th.

SERVICE UNIT 11 4-22a
SEARCH SLIP
Supervisor Dissly Room 3706
Subj: Mrs. Nellie T. Dull
Exact Spelling Searchers
All References Initial auf
Subversive Ref. Date 8-29
Main File
Restricted to Locality of

FILE NUMBER SERIALS
Mr-
Nellie
Mrs

PAGE 270

letter

A letter from FBI Director John Edgar Hoover to Miss Florence Whitish acknowledging receipt of her letter dated August 1, 1952, and informing her that the matter has been referred to the Department of the Air Force.

August 8, 1952

Miss Florence Whitish
Post Office Box 526
Charleston, South Carolina

Dear Miss Whitish: [HANDWRITTEN: Flying SAUCERS]

I wish to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated August 1, 1952.

Since the matter referred to therein is within the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force, I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your letter to that Agency.

Your interest and cooperation in furnishing this material are appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

John Edgar Hoover
Director

KWD:mes [HANDWRITTEN: med]

Note: Bufiles reflect no record concerning Florence Whitish.

cc - 1 - SAC, Savannah (with copy of incoming)

[HANDWRITTEN: SERIAL # 300 SA 11-19-64]
RECORDED - 68 [HANDWRITTEN: 62-83894-301]
INDEXED 68 AUG 13 1952
[HANDWRITTEN: EX-18]
COMM - FBI
6 AUG 20 1952 AUG 1 1 1952
MAILED 28

PAGE 271

other

This page contains only administrative date stamps from the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, indicating receipt of a document in August 1957.

REC'D-TOLSON'S OFFICE
AUG 8 2 03 PM '57
F. B. I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

RECEIVE MAIL ROOM AUG 11 3 09 PM '57
F B I
U.S DEPT OF JUSTICE

REC'D BELMONT
F. B. I.
U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE